The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 October 2024, 03:24 AM   #61
Calatrava r
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandor View Post
Yeah they're definitely dropping fast. I see 60k as a very reasonable target within the next year.
That is getting close to what I think FMV should be on this watch. I remember well when they were 20K retail and could be had easily at a discount.
Calatrava r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 03:28 AM   #62
FrançoisCzapek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Watch: Classic Pateks
Posts: 263
Do you see the old 5711/1A dropping to $60k, but not taking other steel Nautilus models down with it?
FrançoisCzapek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 04:39 AM   #63
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrançoisCzapek View Post
This is the problem. Someone who has yet to buy a 5711 might actually be interested, and not need to be put off by this kind of comment.
Watches are not investments. Best advice a potential buyer could ever get.
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 04:57 AM   #64
ChetBaker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 709
Many collectors consider their watches a store of value, if not an asset, so going beyond the typical “buy what you like” and “watches are not investments” cliches is fully justified.
ChetBaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 04:57 AM   #65
SudiYunus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Washington
Watch: Cartier Panthere
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by v25v View Post
this is the problem. I could give a crap if the value of my 5711 goes down or not, this is not why i bought the watch. If investment is what you are after, put your money in the market.
+1
__________________
Cartier Panthere ,Tudor GMT
Cartier Santos 100 XL ,Tudor 925
DJ 36 Pink Dial ,PAM Due Blue
DJ 36 White Dial ,CasiOak
Sub ND
SudiYunus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 09:02 AM   #66
Ichiran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ichiran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Near beach
Watch: PB1967
Posts: 8,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by v25v View Post
watches are not investments. Best advice a potential buyer could ever get.
+2
Ichiran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 07:40 PM   #67
Partekular
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichiran View Post
+2

+3 … BUT…. One doesn’t want to by a watch which depreciates as fast as a lead balloon falls. If that happens one feels stupid for not buying grey a year after release. Buyer’s remorse is not good for any brand.
Partekular is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 07:47 PM   #68
kaiserphoenix
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,707
i think its inevitable that residuals form part of the equation when one is looking to spend, 50-100K + AND watch prices are so exorbiant these days, even for non hype watches. I know that is a small sum for some and a considerable sum for others, but at least for me, even if my aim isnt to "make money" I cannot afford to buy a 100K watch and see it fall to 50K instantly. So whilst its not an "investment", it needs to hold its value "reasonably".
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001

IG: tokyo_watch_guy
kaiserphoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 08:38 PM   #69
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
i think its inevitable that residuals form part of the equation when one is looking to spend, 50-100K + AND watch prices are so exorbiant these days, even for non hype watches. I know that is a small sum for some and a considerable sum for others, but at least for me, even if my aim isnt to "make money" I cannot afford to buy a 100K watch and see it fall to 50K instantly. So whilst its not an "investment", it needs to hold its value "reasonably".
I completely agree with this. And, with a few exceptions, the wealthy people I've met really care about not tossing money away. Residual value matters to most and making money on luxury items becomes a bragging right to many.
cascavel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 08:41 PM   #70
jcdevoe26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Podgorica, MNE
Posts: 353
I personally love the fact that a watch such as the 5711 (or 5167) draw too much hype and attention....keeps everyone distracted and chasing after a few pieces while the real gems are easy to get for those of us that lust after them...4947-1/a, for me the perfect Patek (AC, SS, 38mm, unique blue dial)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PP_4947-1A.jpg (144.0 KB, 610 views)
jcdevoe26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 09:58 PM   #71
1William
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by V25V View Post
Watches are not investments. Best advice a potential buyer could ever get.
I disagree with this. Watches are an investment should you choose to use them that way. But they are not a good investment.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2024, 10:53 PM   #72
Partekular
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 508
Check out current RRP of 5172g and 5320G then compare with grey market prices on Watcharts.com. - then deduct 10-20% for sellers margin.

Investments? - Not in the normal pecuniary sense. You can see the rare riser - Nautilus and Aquanaut but fashion is a major determinate in their price - subjective not objective value.
Partekular is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2024, 01:40 AM   #73
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1William View Post
I disagree with this. Watches are an investment should you choose to use them that way. But they are not a good investment.
Well, they're certainly not reliable investments. More like SPACs, few make money but some do and only the issuers are certain to profit.
cascavel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2024, 04:08 AM   #74
Mattt
"TRF" Member
 
Mattt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 269
I disagree with the idea that watches aren’t investments. Most serious collectors, in any field, aim to acquire rare pieces and build collections at the best possible prices. What’s the point of collecting if you’re going to lose 70% on every purchase? Part of the thrill is finding a good deal and adding it to the collection.
Mattt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2024, 08:35 AM   #75
z train
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: MD
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
i think its inevitable that residuals form part of the equation when one is looking to spend, 50-100K + AND watch prices are so exorbiant these days, even for non hype watches. I know that is a small sum for some and a considerable sum for others, but at least for me, even if my aim isnt to "make money" I cannot afford to buy a 100K watch and see it fall to 50K instantly. So whilst its not an "investment", it needs to hold its value "reasonably".

You just described deflation and which is why I believe the watch market has a lot further to drop.
z train is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2024, 11:59 PM   #76
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
i think its inevitable that residuals form part of the equation when one is looking to spend, 50-100K + AND watch prices are so exorbiant these days, even for non hype watches. I know that is a small sum for some and a considerable sum for others, but at least for me, even if my aim isnt to "make money" I cannot afford to buy a 100K watch and see it fall to 50K instantly. So whilst its not an "investment", it needs to hold its value "reasonably".
These types of threads are never about watches holding value. I do not think anyone has an issue with that, the issue is "hype" and one worried about the value either tanking (from a price way above MSRP) or going up. That is something I have never once even considered when buying my watches. Now I have got all of mine at MSRP. If I had to buy gray for far above MSRP and the thought of it dropping in value really concerned me, I wouldn't buy it as it would not be enjoyable to own and actually wear.
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 12:52 AM   #77
PAFG
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: NY
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattt View Post
I disagree with the idea that watches aren’t investments. Most serious collectors, in any field, aim to acquire rare pieces and build collections at the best possible prices. What’s the point of collecting if you’re going to lose 70% on every purchase? Part of the thrill is finding a good deal and adding it to the collection.
And this right here is why the watch market is ruined.. ^^

Before anyone heard the word COVID - watches as investments were the last possible idea on anyones mind. Now comes along a world pandemic and money printing, and suddenly people start thinking watches go up in value and should be that way lollll.
PAFG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 01:00 AM   #78
Vince_76
"TRF" Member
 
Vince_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by pafg View Post
and this right here is why the watch market is ruined.. ^^

before anyone heard the word covid - watches as investments were the last possible idea on anyones mind. Now comes along a world pandemic and money printing, and suddenly people start thinking watches go up in value and should be that way lollll.
100%
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1
Vince_76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 01:15 AM   #79
crod
2024 Pledge Member
 
crod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: -
Watch: FPJ OPTIMUM
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaiserphoenix View Post
i think its inevitable that residuals form part of the equation when one is looking to spend, 50-100K + AND watch prices are so exorbiant these days, even for non hype watches. I know that is a small sum for some and a considerable sum for others, but at least for me, even if my aim isnt to "make money" I cannot afford to buy a 100K watch and see it fall to 50K instantly. So whilst its not an "investment", it needs to hold its value "reasonably".
I agree with this. I dont want to make money, I've sold very few watches during my collecting journey (less than 10) and I would be prepared to take some losses in a few of them but not in all of them, its important if you a buy a $50K plus watch you are not going to lose 50% o more when you sell it.
In that price range the collection as a whole needs to hold value, I think its healthy.
crod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 01:16 AM   #80
FrançoisCzapek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Watch: Classic Pateks
Posts: 263
Might we go back to talking about the 5711?
FrançoisCzapek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 05:41 AM   #81
norcalgt3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Orange
Posts: 285
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrançoisCzapek View Post
Might we go back to talking about the 5711?
What is that saying? the calcu....errr...cubitus has changed.
norcalgt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2024, 06:05 PM   #82
jenniferjanef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by raclaims View Post
I think people underestimate the 5711 a bit...even when I was getting insane discounts on anything Patek...I still struggled to get a 5711...maybe I'm unique but I believe it's never been an easy piece to acquire. That said I do hope they drop a bit so I can add a few more.
Back in 2010, 2011 or was it 2009 .. I can’t recall exactly but I bought my 5711 white dial with 15% discount and blue dial with 5% off retail and 5712R with 25% off and 5980/1R with 10% discount too. The only PP I bought without any discount before all these crazy wristwatch hype was my 5235G.
jenniferjanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2024, 08:17 PM   #83
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAFG View Post
And this right here is why the watch market is ruined.. ^^

Before anyone heard the word COVID - watches as investments were the last possible idea on anyones mind. Now comes along a world pandemic and money printing, and suddenly people start thinking watches go up in value and should be that way lollll.
I guess you weren't around in the days of the Panerai gold rush. Remember "Paneristi"?
The Aquanaut and the Nautilus weren't always the apple of watch collectors eyes but other watches were.
cascavel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.