The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 11:37 AM   #1
NardinNut
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
ALS 1815 Chrono vs Patek 5960g

Alright, I’m going to do one of those dreaded this-or-that threads. I’m really hung up on the decision of which to choose. One of these two will be my next watch. I just can’t decide.

On one hand, the ALS 1815 chrono is one of the pinnacle manual chronographs. It’s stunning. Then you flip it over and holy sh*t the most visually brilliant movement on the market. Add to that, I’m a HUGE manual wound chrono fan. I currently own the PP 5170g (white dial), Omega 321 Speedy, and feel the 1815 chrono would be a great addition to round the trifecta. I’m looking at the black dial version to complement the white dial of my 5170.

Then there’s the PP 5960g. It’s Patek’s first in-house automatic chrono with annual calendar. It’s more sporty, I no longer wear a suit so all my watches end up on more casual straps, so I feel like I can play with straps more. I’ve never owned an annual calendar, so that’s missing in my collection (however I change out watches often so would need it on the winder). And it’s more limited only being released in 2017, from my understanding (the blue dial version specifically). I’m also a huge PP fan, although I’ve never owned an ALS.

So there’s my dilemma, which to get. Yes it would be great to own both, but not happening (for now). I don’t have the ability to see either in person, so I would love to hear owners opinions on either, and just have fun hearing which one other members would choose.

Photos of each I borrowed from the web:

NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:43 PM   #2
kunlun
"TRF" Member
 
kunlun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,966
Between those two, ALS x 1,000,000
kunlun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:55 PM   #3
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Lange; you laid out the reasons well.
__________________
----------------------
Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:05 PM   #4
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,284
ALS in this case but I would take a 5070 over both
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:41 PM   #5
bioyuki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: California
Posts: 73
I’m a huge Patek chrono fan, but hands down the 1815 over the 5960G
bioyuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:59 PM   #6
misochew
"TRF" Member
 
misochew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Real Name: Eaton B.
Location: California
Watch: n+1
Posts: 168
For this matchup, ALS is no brainer, and twice on Sunday. if it was vs 5172, much tougher choice
misochew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:52 PM   #7
le_baron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 263
ALS. Hands down!
__________________
Lange Lange 1 ref. 191.021 | Audemars Piguet Royal Oak ref. 15500 | Breguet Classique ref. 5177BB | Glashütte Original Panoreserve | Breitling Navitimer 01 Limited Edition
le_baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:06 PM   #8
Steele
"TRF" Member
 
Steele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Florida
Watch: All of them
Posts: 753
Yeah I have to say I love both watches but especially in that gold with black dial configuration 100X the ALS
Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:28 PM   #9
mbalmz
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mbalmz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,362
gotta go ALS here.
__________________
_______________
___________
_______
___

instagram: @brooklynwatchguy
mbalmz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 04:29 PM   #10
ButtButt
"TRF" Member
 
ButtButt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Asia
Posts: 843
1815 easily. I have some of the same/similar watches as you and I also never wear suits.
ButtButt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:07 PM   #11
ChetBaker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 719
1815. I had a 5960G that I recently traded up for a 5172. Mainly for two reasons: 1. the 5960G case is thick and a little uninspired 2. While a nice combination of functions, nothing beats a manual chrono or a perpetual calendar. The 5960 is neither and that started bugging me. I also looked at the black 1815 and the only reason I did not go for it was that I couldn’t find one near me to try on.
ChetBaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:40 PM   #12
cascavel
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,894
Thanks for making the choice such an easy one: Lange 1815.
cascavel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:53 PM   #13
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,720
1815
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:23 PM   #14
NardinNut
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
Wow the ALS is overwhelmingly winning. Confirms what my heart has been trying to tell me.

It’s funny, I haven’t looked at pics of both of them together until I made this thread. Now looking at the pictures together the ALS really stands out as such a beautiful piece.
NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:25 PM   #15
NardinNut
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
ALS in this case but I would take a 5070 over both

I absolutely love the 5070, the blue dial platinum specifically, but that is in a different price league (and I have the 5170).
NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:30 PM   #16
NardinNut
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
NardinNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Proxima b
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChetBaker View Post
1815. I had a 5960G that I recently traded up for a 5172. Mainly for two reasons: 1. the 5960G case is thick and a little uninspired 2. While a nice combination of functions, nothing beats a manual chrono or a perpetual calendar. The 5960 is neither and that started bugging me. I also looked at the black 1815 and the only reason I did not go for it was that I couldn’t find one near me to try on.

Thanks for this insight. The case thickness of the 5960 was my biggest hangup. When dealing with this level of Horology I really expect, and appreciate, a slim case. Granted there’s a bunch packed in there but anything over 12mm gives me pause.

And I agree, nothing beats a manual chronograph! My 5170 cemented my love and obsession for manual chronos
NardinNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:34 PM   #17
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,472
ALS hands down.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:55 PM   #18
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,278
ALS for sure but man you’ve reminded me that dial combo is excellent on the patek. A classic look paired with that brown strap.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:01 AM   #19
dbfagan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: David
Location: NOVA
Posts: 553
ALS all day. If you had said 5070 then maybe a different discussion
dbfagan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:37 AM   #20
ts3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,490
ALS for me too.

Not a fan of the triple cutout AC with the left and right windows having different fonts and widths and at 13.5mm the 5960 is too thick for me anyway. But I'd love for Patek to make a 5960 style chrono w/o AC at 11-12mm (no date or simple date). There is the 5968 but that is awfully large and the even thinner 5975 lacks the chrono counter.
ts3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (2 members and 2 guests)
diracpoint , NYG1121

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.