Explorer 39 vs 40...anybody with a strong preference?

[CaptT]

Originally Posted by brandrea

That’s exactly right … the minute details are what make this hobby so interesting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So true, and so interesting what some people key in on. I’m “guilty” of this myself.

And given the various perspectives and preferences on the forum for 39 vs 40, Explorer name placement, crowns size and dial color differences, I can only imagine the ensuing discussions and debate should Rolex ever add crown guards to the Explorer models (as they did with the most recent Air-King).

[boa2]

Originally Posted by TimeAZ

I think the 39mm Explorer 214270 is the best iteration of the explorer in its entire production line history. Just my biased opinion.

Agreed. Perfect watch, in my view.

[MJ EXPLORER]

Originally Posted by Ketler

36, 39, 40...I really think it comes down to personal preference as they are all lovely watches...

I happen to have the 39mm version and it fits my 8 inch wrist like a glove...

In my 40 plus years of wearing a Rolex of one kind or another, it is without a doubt the most comfortable Rolex I have ever had.

And I prefer the placement of the text on this version...

I'm not sure why Rolex discontinued the 39mm version as it wears much more like a 40mm piece anyway in my opinion...

And the 3100 caliber movements have all stood the test of time (No pun intended)...


Attachment 1467667

40 years!! That's an amazing testimony of the Explorer. I think the "40" is a realization that they shouldn't have discontinued the 39. It's basically the same watch, but for two things. The wider bracelet and glossy dial (with AR coating) are immediatly obvious on the 40. I think it comes down to preference between matte and glossy.

When the mk2 39 came out I though it was the best watch ever made. I ever so slightly prefer the 40, but they are really close.

Great shot of your Explorer by the way!

[MJ EXPLORER]

Originally Posted by CaptT

So true, and so interesting what some people key in on. I’m “guilty” of this myself.

And given the various perspectives and preferences on the forum for 39 vs 40, Explorer name placement, crowns size and dial color differences, I can only imagine the ensuing discussions and debate should Rolex ever add crown guards to the Explorer models (as they did with the most recent Air-King).

Crown guards on the Explorer would break the Rolex Forum! 116900 vs 126900 Air-Kings is much more of a discussion as they are wildly different in case shape/thickness. I've always considered the modern Air-King's to somewhat of a testing ground for the Explorer....much like the Yacht-Master was for the Submariner. Not that I think they'll ever implement them, but more of a model they can play around with without offending the purists.

[MJ EXPLORER]

Originally Posted by WatchBum

Go smaller even better, Go 36mm

I tried the modern 36 (steel and two tone) and loved them for a good long while. Then woke up one day and thought "these are too small for me." I did the same thing with the DEEPSEA recently. Wore it as a daily for 6 months and absolutely loved it. Then woke up one day and thought "it's too big for me."

I think my sweet spot is 40 to 42....but like all things with watches, my taste will evolve/change.

[noshame]

Congrats, MJ! Super happy for you. I too love the 40's gloss dial with AR coating, really makes the dial look inky black. Enjoy!

[toomuchtalk]

Originally Posted by MJ EXPLORER

There it is! The mk1 looking good.

best one

[so nice]

40mm or 36mm over the 39mm every time