![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Orleans
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 299
|
PLEASE READ THIS before you buy either gmt 2c or SS sub (my 2cent comparison)
I tell ya guys, i love my TT gmt2c and i just got a SS sub (i cant remember the numbers but it) but its the most recent model before the change to "supercase". I have to say i REALLY didnt know how different these 2 watches are. (you guys said so! LOL) The sub is much lighter than the gmt2c, sometimes the sub feels more comfortable although it doesnt feel as "substantial". a lot less bling (good) not as thick, and the clasp is very tinny...kinda similar to my date and date just. The gmt2 feels more polished like a work of art and the sub feels like a workhorse. I absolutely LOVE each one for what it is and can now REALLY appreciate the difference for the different utilities. I was in atlanta waiting on a conference call from los angeles and trying to buy stocks in South Africa 3 wks ago and finally got a chance to "use" that gmt. it was pure pleasure to finally use the watch for the purpose that it was desigend for. Pure bliss! And the sub... i havent gone diving with it yet but i hit the mayan rivera in 2 weeks and i planned 2 days of diving but i can really see how this watch would be better in that salty stuff than my gmt. So if you want a good christmas present for yourself or someone else go to your AD and try on both of these watches and decide BEFORE you buy either one. Really examine what you want to use them for. Then come here and buy them so you can save a boatload of money. Merry Christmas!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
Good analysis and I agree!
![]()
__________________
member#3242 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Coast
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 557
|
I did kinda the opposite, TT sub first and then SS GMTIIc and I totally agree that both are different enough to justify "needing" both. I love both for different reasons. Congrats on your new sub, wear in good health, and have fun on your vacation!
__________________
116520|116610LV|116710LN|16613|16233 244 232.30.42|3222.80 A2332212 CFX-200|Riseman|GW-M5610 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
|
I too have and enjoy both. I chose each for its function and I have not been disappointed. You wrote a good summary of the differences.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Ricky
Location: City of Sin
Watch: Hulk, DaytonaC, DJ
Posts: 1,149
|
I got a Sub, but now I've been really leaning towards trading it in for a GMT or a GMT II-C, either one is fine. The function just suits me better. The Sub though, is still an awesome everyday watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: Texas
Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN
Posts: 453
|
Love both watches!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: USA
Watch: me go all out
Posts: 1,183
|
Post a few pics please, chebert. I'd love to see your TT GMT.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
There are some people who think the two watches are too similar in appearance to justify owning both. Me, I think people tend to over-analyse things!
Both are great watches and it makes absolute sense to have both if you can afford them!! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
They are the perfect yin and yang.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Orleans
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 299
|
my camera sucks as i spend all my money on cars and watches...LOL
My pics always come out stupid and blurry. then i come to this site and the pics are amazing. I will post some pics of my collection in the next day or so but you guys cant laugh!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,816
|
Both great watches!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2
|
Can't decide Sub or GMT?
i own an all gold President and sometime more sporty/casual.
I'm having a hard time deciding whether to buy the new SS GMT II or the SS Submariner. I As mentioned in the posts above the GMT is more 'bling', a little thicker a little heavier. Originally I was going to buy the Submariner but then after going to the local AD I tried both on, at first liked the Sub only then the GMT really started to grow on me. Which one to buy, I've don't recall ever being so 50 - 50 on a decision :) I like the new GMT in some ways, it's the latest and greatest, the weight and it being more busy grew on me the more I compared them. Then the Sub, the great Rolex classic, but it's likely it won't be the latest and greatest once they introduce a new model in 2010. What to do ?? Which one to you own, and what made you choose it? Thank you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Sydney
Watch: 118239
Posts: 413
|
You have to have a Sub in your collection. Iconic, everyday wear kind of watch :)
__________________
The world is safe again... but for how long? Current: TAG Heuer 2000 Classic, Kobold Phantom Tactical Chronograph, Rolex Submariner 16610, Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronograph A13320 (Crowe Edition), Rolex Day-Date 118239 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SE Asia
Watch: SS Sub Date
Posts: 431
|
Both are awesome pieces.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
I think it's the perfect choice to get a TT GMT IIC (shiny, classy, looks expensive) and a SS Sub (understated, iconic, versatile, sporty). I got the same impression when trying these pieces: the GMT IIC has a more solid feel due to the improved bracelet and clasp, but the Sub is a lot less sparkly. To me the perfect two-piece Rolex collection would be the TT GMT IIC and the SS Sub Ceramic -- as long as it won't have PCL of course.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Watch: Rolex VC JLC IWC
Posts: 452
|
I also own both an feel that I couldn't do without them. Both have a specific function and feel. If you like wearing a Rolex because it makes you feel good (I do), having the right one for the mood/occasion just sweetens the experience.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." - Ernest Hemingway |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Watch: Rolex VC JLC IWC
Posts: 452
|
OK, I'm in Afghanistan and I SWEAR I hit send once! The Internet is veeeeery slow. Sorry for the triple post!
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." - Ernest Hemingway |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Watch: Rolex VC JLC IWC
Posts: 452
|
Again, very sorry for the extra posts.
__________________
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." - Ernest Hemingway |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
I agree I love them both and feel very lucky to have them both.
__________________
Always working...by choice ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,952
|
I have had a SS Date sub(stolen) and the GMT in TT , and both are superb watches. Unless you want to do lots of diving, i think the GMT is a better allround watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: HaNgat
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Sports Rolex
Posts: 648
|
They are both very useful for their purposes. Just weigh your wallets if you decide to go for both...:-)
__________________
Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.