ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Welshwatchman · 8 February 2007, 10:48 PM

Many will be disappointed if Rolex fail to showcase any new models at Basel this year.

Some, would be mortified if Rolex made too many changes.

Which of the above are you?

padi56 · 8 February 2007, 10:56 PM

Well lets be honest about this most of the so called models now are either revamped vintage,or just cosmetically changed movement wise or case or bracelet.But I would love to see some new models from Rolex.IMHO they have rested on there laurels of if its not broke why fix long enough.

Ragu · 8 February 2007, 11:01 PM

I'd like to see some new models (affordable)

leopardprey · 9 February 2007, 12:08 AM

I voted no new models, but would like to see a return of one of the originals.

Would like to see a Military Sub version offered. Maxi Dial with no white gold outlines, and welded lugs with a Nato strap. With no Stainless steel bracelet and no white gold hour outlines, would cut the cost down somewhat and make a Rolex watch more affordable to Military personnel.

mrbieler · 9 February 2007, 12:15 AM

It would be nice to see Rolex acknowledge it's roots a little and build some no nonsense tool watches without the bling and bulk. Sometimes simpler is better.

nko51 · 9 February 2007, 01:01 AM

No Changes, Unless They Are Super Dynamic.

Welshwatchman · 9 February 2007, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbieler

It would be nice to see Rolex acknowledge it's roots a little and build some no nonsense tool watches without the bling and bulk. Sometimes simpler is better.

I don't think there's a chance of Rolex creating more basic tool watches.

The insane prices that they charge already for their simple, well built, workhorses such as the SS DJ / Airking / Sub / SD / GMT / Exp is already causing outrage amongst enthusiasts.

Rolex seem determined to continually charge ever higher (luxury) prices for their watches so probably feel the need to attempt to justify the increased prices with some design changes to give the illusion of value for money.

The fact that the RSC shun their heritage watches further states this case.

Mr. K · 9 February 2007, 01:29 AM

I think they should speed up implementation of the upgrades. Ceramic bezel, better clasps and bracelets, maxi dials.

As for brand new models, I can live without.

As for more afforadable, I think the more prices will go up so will the discounts availble.

padi56 · 9 February 2007, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leopardprey

I voted no new models, but would like to see a return of one of the originals.

Would like to see a Military Sub version offered. Maxi Dial with no white gold outlines, and welded lugs with a Nato strap. With no Stainless steel bracelet and no white gold hour outlines, would cut the cost down somewhat and make a Rolex watch more affordable to Military personnel.

Now your talking proper Rolex,not these modern upstarts.but perhaps with the original oyster bracelet and not a S.steel copy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbieler

It would be nice to see Rolex acknowledge it's roots a little and build some no nonsense tool watches without the bling and bulk. Sometimes simpler is better.

Bling bling = £££$$$$$$$$$$$£££££$$$$$ profit .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

The insane prices that they charge already for their simple, well built, workhorses such as the SS DJ / Airking / Sub / SD / GMT / Exp is already causing outrage amongst enthusiasts.

Rolex seem determined to continually charge ever higher (luxury) prices for their watches so probably feel the need to attempt to justify the increased prices with some design changes to give the illusion of value for money.

The fact that the RSC shun their heritage watches further states this case.

Could not agree more, seems to me Rolex sometimes forgets
the past watches,that made them what they are today.

Mrdi · 9 February 2007, 02:05 AM

Fewer Pimpmobiles
More tools!

tonelar · 9 February 2007, 03:37 AM

Wait, where's Number 7? TT Tiger Shark Submariner?

JJ Irani · 9 February 2007, 04:09 AM

I'd love one with a Power Reserve indicator!!

kakalika · 9 February 2007, 04:30 AM

Still dreaming of a SS GMT Anniversary

mike · 9 February 2007, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. K

I think they should speed up implementation of the upgrades. Ceramic bezel, better clasps and bracelets, maxi dials.

I agree Mark. These are things whose time has come. Rolex has put themselves at a price point where other brands are becomming more and more attractive.
Many people just do not want to pony up another 2k+ for TT models to get something Omega, Panerai and a few others offer at a much better price.

If I could have anything it's that Rolex would service the fine vintage pieces that put them in the position they are in now instead of treating these pieces as throw-a-ways!

mrbieler · 9 February 2007, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

I'd love one with a Power Reserve indicator!!

That's it. You're fired!

I know Rolex won't got back and it's onward and upward which is why Rolex and I will part ways. Same lament I have with my other favorite icon, Land Rover.

I'll stick with my stainless and acrylic models....

indy78 · 9 February 2007, 09:45 AM

Just picked up my TT 16613 today and discussed possible forthcoming changes. The AD didn't think it be too long before Rolex was going to add the new ceramic bezel to the Submariner. I replied it will probably be next year since I just made the purchase. A day late and a dollar short is my luck.

A. Jacobs · 9 February 2007, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbieler

It would be nice to see Rolex acknowledge it's roots a little and build some no nonsense tool watches without the bling and bulk. Sometimes simpler is better.

I agree

Thurnau · 9 February 2007, 03:29 PM

I don't know. I like to see something new, but I don't want to have an outdated watch. For instance the new rolex in the chapter ring. It is subtle, nice detail, and is interesting. Mine doesn't have it

It is small so it isn't a big deal. The newer jub clasp is love at first sight. I say bring some changes with or without diamonds, but not too many, and improve the watch. I think the clasp on the DJ is great.

My wife sold off her first DJ because she hated the clasp so much... It would fall off while she wore it. She loves her new DJ clasp style. So I think as long as the watch gets better bring it on.

I would like to see a longer power reserve. Maybe not an 8 day one, but more than 40 hours.

Hey, why not test the intelligent watch waters? Even if it is on their tudor model. A lower end watch with a battery reserve, or maybe a tool watch that glows longer. In early 1900 wasn't Rolex on the bleeding edge of technology? Why not have a Rolex as accurate as the Seikos priced at a fraction of the cost?

indy78 · 9 February 2007, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thurnau

I don't know. I like to see something new, but I don't want to have an outdated watch. For instance the new rolex in the chapter ring. It is subtle, nice detail, and is interesting. Mine doesn't have it

It is small so it isn't a big deal. The newer jub clasp is love at first sight. I say bring some changes with or without diamonds, but not too many, and improve the watch. I think the clasp on the DJ is great.

My wife sold off her first DJ because she hated the clasp so much... It would fall off while she wore it. She loves her new DJ clasp style. So I think as long as the watch gets better bring it on.

I would like to see a longer power reserve. Maybe not an 8 day one, but more than 40 hours.

Hey, why not test the intelligent watch waters? Even if it is on their tudor model. A lower end watch with a battery reserve, or maybe a tool watch that glows longer. In early 1900 wasn't Rolex on the bleeding edge of technology? Why not have a Rolex as accurate as the Seikos priced at a fraction of the cost?

Its ashame your wife sold her datjust due to the clasp. I was having the exact same probelm and I took my datejust to the AD where I made the purchase. He made an adjustment within 30 seconds and the clasp now snaps closed and stays closed.

View Poll Results: Which of the following would you prefer at Basel 2007
0 - No changes to the Rolex line up	11	26.83%
1 - New style GMT SS	18	43.90%
2 - New styled TT Sub/YM (No SS models until 2008-9)	2	4.88%
3 - New TT Sub/YM / SS Sub/YM	3	7.32%
4 - As 3 +more Daytona SS dial styles colours/contrasts	1	2.44%
5 - The more changes the better (excluding diamonds)	1	2.44%
6 - The more the better, what the hell !!!	5	12.20%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

8 February 2007, 10:48 PM	#1
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	New Rolex Models Many will be disappointed if Rolex fail to showcase any new models at Basel this year. Some, would be mortified if Rolex made too many changes. Which of the above are you? __________________ ..33

8 February 2007, 10:56 PM	#2
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 52,766	Well lets be honest about this most of the so called models now are either revamped vintage,or just cosmetically changed movement wise or case or bracelet.But I would love to see some new models from Rolex.IMHO they have rested on there laurels of if its not broke why fix long enough. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

9 February 2007, 12:15 AM	#5
mrbieler "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Lost Angeles Watch: all about acrylic Posts: 683	It would be nice to see Rolex acknowledge it's roots a little and build some no nonsense tool watches without the bling and bulk. Sometimes simpler is better. __________________ - Jeff Cursimus Cum Forfex

9 February 2007, 03:37 AM	#11
tonelar "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Tony Location: san francisco Watch: Seadweller Posts: 1,368	Wait, where's Number 7? TT Tiger Shark Submariner? __________________ It's a rarity that something popular is actually right... Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all.

8 February 2007, 11:01 PM	#3
Ragu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Ragu Sauce Location: Southern, FL Watch: the Sauce ;) Posts: 781	I'd like to see some new models (affordable)

9 February 2007, 12:08 AM	#4
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	I voted no new models, but would like to see a return of one of the originals. Would like to see a Military Sub version offered. Maxi Dial with no white gold outlines, and welded lugs with a Nato strap. With no Stainless steel bracelet and no white gold hour outlines, would cut the cost down somewhat and make a Rolex watch more affordable to Military personnel.

9 February 2007, 01:01 AM	#6
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	No Changes, Unless They Are Super Dynamic.

9 February 2007, 01:29 AM	#8
Mr. K "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Mark Location: Seattle-ish Posts: 6,054	I think they should speed up implementation of the upgrades. Ceramic bezel, better clasps and bracelets, maxi dials. As for brand new models, I can live without. As for more afforadable, I think the more prices will go up so will the discounts availble.

9 February 2007, 02:05 AM	#10
Mrdi Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Posts: 3,478	Fewer Pimpmobiles More tools!

9 February 2007, 04:09 AM	#12
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	I'd love one with a Power Reserve indicator!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

9 February 2007, 04:30 AM	#13
kakalika "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Minnesota, USA Watch: SS Sub-Date Posts: 505	Still dreaming of a SS GMT Anniversary __________________ I thought I was mistaken, but then I realized I was wrong.

9 February 2007, 09:45 AM	#16
indy78 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: 116233 Serti Posts: 204	Ceramic Bezel Just picked up my TT 16613 today and discussed possible forthcoming changes. The AD didn't think it be too long before Rolex was going to add the new ceramic bezel to the Submariner. I replied it will probably be next year since I just made the purchase. A day late and a dollar short is my luck.

9 February 2007, 03:29 PM	#18
Thurnau "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Watch: DateJust Posts: 738	I don't know. I like to see something new, but I don't want to have an outdated watch. For instance the new rolex in the chapter ring. It is subtle, nice detail, and is interesting. Mine doesn't have it It is small so it isn't a big deal. The newer jub clasp is love at first sight. I say bring some changes with or without diamonds, but not too many, and improve the watch. I think the clasp on the DJ is great. My wife sold off her first DJ because she hated the clasp so much... It would fall off while she wore it. She loves her new DJ clasp style. So I think as long as the watch gets better bring it on. I would like to see a longer power reserve. Maybe not an 8 day one, but more than 40 hours. Hey, why not test the intelligent watch waters? Even if it is on their tudor model. A lower end watch with a battery reserve, or maybe a tool watch that glows longer. In early 1900 wasn't Rolex on the bleeding edge of technology? Why not have a Rolex as accurate as the Seikos priced at a fraction of the cost?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)