ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 August 2010, 05:55 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
|
This eBay's listing of Rolex 5510 Big Crown Sub is misrepresented..
Err buddies...can Lady Casper wield her magic one to invalidate...
this eBay listing...for misinterpretation of a tampered "Rolex 5510 Big Crown Submariner"...? "ROLEX SUBMARINER MODEL 5510 MADE IN 1959. RARE JAMES BOND BIG CROWN SUBMARINER. ORIGINAL DIAL..NOT REFINISHED ! 1530 MOVEMENT RUNS GREAT. KEEPS GOOD TIME. I WILL CONSIDER ALL SERIOUS OFFERS" http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-SUBMARINER...item4152616f6e 1. Case had been tampered with incorrect fonts of Case Ref#... 2. Case had been tampered with incorrect fonts of Case Serial Nos... 3. Case had been tampered with incorrect markings(restamped) 3. Bezel assembly is FAKEEE... Note:... a. Dial looks correct... b. Cal. 1530 Movement looks correct...but without Butterfly Rotor... Here are the pictures of the BAD watch from the listing... |
31 August 2010, 07:09 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: blaine
Location: memphis
Watch: my next find
Posts: 1,060
|
O, also i am not digging the inside of that case back.
the bezel and rotor i get. the case ref number, hmmmm? am sort of liking. the serial number, agree. i am sure, that "I" probably don't handle as may as you (5510's) in your library of watches and information. could please post a few 5510 case ref. # or point me in the direction all ears for a tip keep the plastic's inside and wear the sapphires in the yard you can always buy another if you tear it up |
31 August 2010, 08:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
|
31 August 2010, 09:01 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
|
Err buddies...sure what good is knowledge...
when it's NOT shared... Here's the tips... 1. In the 50s...many Rolex watches didn't bear the stamping marks of "REGISTERED DESIGN"... between the lugs at 12 o'clock... 2. Even when it did exist on certain watches of perhaps late 50s... for the likes of 5508 n 5510 Submariner... the fonts "REGISTERED DESIGN"... must conform to the norm at the time... n should NOT have...LONG Middle Stroke of "E"... to begin with... The ones in eBay's 5510 is wrong...n the Middle Stroke of "E" is LOOOOG... 3. Most of production date stamping inside of Rolex caseback... should be like "I.59 or II.59 or III.59 or IV.59 or VI.59"... denoting the quarter period of production in that year... The one in eBay's 5510 is stamped as..."1959"... this is NOT seen before...inside original Rolex backcases. 4. eBay's 5510 Serial Nos. stamping of numeric fonts..."4829xx"... between the lugs at 6 o'clock...is WRONG also... One may wanna compare it with this one... The correct stamping fonts should look like this... for an example..."4821xx"... Pics courtesy of VRF... |
31 August 2010, 09:19 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
Great information....... and bingo!........re the picture below, I think that you know where this comes from my good friend.........
|
1 September 2010, 02:38 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Orchi,
Check out the caseback on this one... maybe some do have that date format of I.195x ??? the auction below looks entirely kosher to me: http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-cal-1130-6...item1c1539fc61 |
1 September 2010, 02:40 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
|
Err buddies...eBay needs to be bump harder...
The listing is still valid... |
1 September 2010, 02:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I've report it too.
__________________
..33 |
1 September 2010, 03:06 AM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
|
Quote:
n Orchi did find a similar caseback of 5510 with "I.1958"... BUT the "5510" fonts don't match up... with the one in eBay's 5510..."I.1959". Note: 5510 Sub is so rare... that it's thought to be produced only in 1958...by Rolex. n still there is the FAKE Crown on eBay's 5510... to be added to the list of bad stuffs that the watch has... In the States... It's common to say... "3 Strikes..." The relevant pic showing the REAL Deal Rolex 5510 case Ref stamping marks...is self destructed in 10 seconds... (due to sensitivity to protect against FAKE n imitation attempts) |
|
1 September 2010, 11:41 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 2,934
|
Err buddies...seems like the listing is much more stubborn than earlier thought...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.