![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
Are the 16710/16610 and varients now considered "vintage"
Just wondering as I noticed a posting in here on a 16710. With all the changes to the Rolex line as of late, what is the generally accepted definition of "vintage"?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
In my view no.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 35,980
|
Agreed. Discontinued and on there way to becoming vintage.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band ![]() Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation ![]() The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
No
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.