ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 April 2011, 05:12 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
agree
|
9 April 2011, 05:34 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,225
|
Agree.
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
9 April 2011, 05:42 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Scotland
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,201
|
|
9 April 2011, 05:44 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,748
|
There are exceptions, like what Greg mentioned, but IMHO classy takes a wrong turn somewhere beyond 44mm and even that is big for me. I love 40mm that's perfection.
|
9 April 2011, 05:46 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,982
|
I am with everyone in thinking, that it is not a very attractive watch. Not my cup of tea.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.