|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 December 2011, 09:12 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
Probably garbage
Replacement cases, unless he had a typo, were 44XXXXX to 47XXXXX. I notified him of this but have not heard back. Since the images are garbage, and the insert is aftermarket (check out the 22), I'm thinking garbage.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-1956...#ht_500wt_1204 Last edited by pdoukas; 6 December 2011 at 09:13 AM.. Reason: forgot link |
|
|
|
6 December 2011, 09:39 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Only 3 transactions and a rating of 80%,,,,,,,,,,,piss poor at best!
Not a very good record. |
|
|
|
|
6 December 2011, 07:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
|
Not enough evidence to remove it.......anything definite..?
|
|
|
|
|
7 December 2011, 12:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
No, no evidence........but I replied to him making an offer with one account where he did respond and turned me down, but he did not respond with my other account where I had asked about his possible typo and the fact that I think it is a fake replacement case. I just get so frustrated sometimes.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
