ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 October 2014, 10:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wokingham, Englan
Watch: Platinum DDII
Posts: 86
|
IS it too small for me?
Hi guys.
I just picked up my DDII in Platinum and, while I'm still as in love with the watch as I was years ago when I started thinking I wanted one, I'm not sure if it isn't too small for me... I'm 6ft 3, heavy set and used to wearing larger watches (Omega 45.5 Planet Ocean Chrono has been my go-to watch for the last year), chromos etc... as they suit my large, 8.5/9 inch wrist. I've attached a piccy, let me know what your thoughts are. I love the watch, I love the dial, the case - I'm totally besotted with the bracelet, it's soooo comfortable and I find myself looking at the clasp all the time... Tell me I've not made a huge mistake! |
22 October 2014, 12:51 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,927
|
I think it looks great on you Chris, and not to small at all!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
22 October 2014, 01:01 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,123
|
I second that. I think it looks great on your wrist. In fact, it looks such a good fit that I am surprised that you have an 8.5/9 inch wrist going by that photo.
You have, in my eyes, maybe the most superb watch out there. No need to worry, just enjoy wearing it. Amazing piece |
22 October 2014, 01:16 PM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,834
|
Looks absolutely fine
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
22 October 2014, 01:33 PM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,411
|
Looks good.
What did you measure your wrist with to get 85/9?
__________________
E |
22 October 2014, 02:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
|
Looks perfect. Just the right size for you. No worries at all.
|
22 October 2014, 02:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
|
22 October 2014, 04:53 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wokingham, Englan
Watch: Platinum DDII
Posts: 86
|
Thanks all for you kind words.
I used a tape measure but I needed 4 extra links (ouch!) and always need at least 3 normally but the president links aren't very big I found. I think it's just that I'm used to a much bigger case... I think my eye will get used to it - so I'll hold onto it for now, but thanks for the kind offer, DC |
22 October 2014, 08:48 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,210
|
Looks great. Don't see an issue.
|
22 October 2014, 08:50 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Perfect fit.
|
22 October 2014, 09:06 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wokingham, Englan
Watch: Platinum DDII
Posts: 86
|
I think it's just a lot smaller than I'm used to... For example, there are a lot of DJ Jubilee models that I love the look of (especially the tapestry dial!!) but 36mm is for sure too small for me so I have always avoided those.
I do love it... I think I'm just looking for reassurance that it doesn't look too small on my ham-like appendage Last edited by oooteedee; 22 October 2014 at 09:07 PM.. Reason: spelling error |
22 October 2014, 09:09 PM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,212
|
Maybe take a picture from further away ...
I find close up wrist shots to be a bit tough to judge. I can't believe it would look to small even on a large wrist, but I suppose it's a relative to what you are used to wearing. |
22 October 2014, 09:27 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Honestly, according to objective standards, it looks a little big on your wrist for a dress watch. But somehow you can pull it off. Very nice watch.
|
22 October 2014, 09:37 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wokingham, Englan
Watch: Platinum DDII
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
I'm really lost now lol! |
|
22 October 2014, 09:47 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Platinum DDII will never be a mistake, congrats!
__________________
|
22 October 2014, 09:54 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wokingham, Englan
Watch: Platinum DDII
Posts: 86
|
Thank you very much, all the kind words are very much appreciated!
Would the community appreciate more pics, do you think? I realize this is just a phone snap and I think it deserves better... Maybe a little photo shoot tonight, me thinks :) |
22 October 2014, 10:28 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Look, let me use a couple of examples of how perspective can change.
Remember in the early 90's the trend of big shouldered jackets and suits. Everyone bought them, and people teased you if you wore a natural shoulder (unpadded) suit. Then, in the blink of an eye, big shouldered clothing was OUT of style, and people made fun of those who continued to wear them. Remember in the 80's the larger eyeglass fad. Suddenly everyone wore them (watch any 1980's TV show) and regular sized glasses looked tiny and outdated. Again, in a snap, the gigantic windshield glasses were OUT of style and people were wearing very small glasses, and people who kept their huge eyeglasses were teased or sniggered at. So my point is that size is relative (Einstein was right) and we as humans get used to certain sizes - whatever manufacturers deem in style - and other sizes do not look right. Why do manufacturers do this: money. They need motivations for people to sell a perfectly good suit, eyeglasses, or watch and buy the latest "in style" model, thus keeping their profits flowing. No one will believe this but watch sizes will once again revert to the mean - get back to a more normal size that objectively is in proportion to the wrist. Bottom line, your watch is as close to the right size as possible, but in the 1950's would have looked large, even on you. But not by much, so it will withstand the changes in style. Humungous PAMs and Invictas: not so much. Just my opinion, take it for what it is worth. |
24 October 2014, 06:04 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
And the watch looks good Chris. I'd say a photo from further away, even a mirror shot, would give you a better perspective (something to distance it from what your eyes see close up) |
|
24 October 2014, 06:18 PM | #19 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,123
|
Quote:
I for one, would love to see some more. |
|
24 October 2014, 06:38 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
its a classic ,,, you dont find people wanting five doors on an e type ,,,,
|
25 October 2014, 02:16 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Looks great!
|
29 October 2014, 01:08 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Looks great on your wrist
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
29 October 2014, 04:21 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
|
Looks fine from this picture. May want to zoom out a little to get a better idea.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.