The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 November 2008, 10:12 PM   #1
steel4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
ROLEX watches being perfect?

I have often seen written on websites that when you are comparing a rolex with a replica, just remember that rolex watches are perfect or as perfect as they can be because of all the meticulous attention to detail.

The similar verbage is stated in John Brozek's book, THE ROLEX REPORT.

Well this is where my issue is. The inside (hidden in the casing and not visible on th dial) parts are created by machines but then hand assembled. The dial, the markings, the depositing of the luminous material on the hour hands and hour markers, all is done by machines so ofcourse it is perfect down to a few microns.

But the same can be said for a SEIKO or any other mass produced analog watch for that matter because they are also put together by machines. I have seiko watches whose dials will show the same quality of craftsmanship a ROLEX dial shows .....

The quality of materials ofcourse is different in ROLEX but you can not say a ROLEX dial is more perfect than a SEIKO dial ..

So when people say I buy a rolex because it is perfection, or a symbol of perfection blah blah blah, then that's just a bunch of bologne ....
steel4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 10:23 PM   #2
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
I don't know about Rolex being perfect but I know I am. At least that is what my mother tells me!

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 10:39 PM   #3
G.J
"TRF" Member
 
G.J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbits76 View Post
I don't know about Rolex being perfect but I know I am. At least that is what my mother tells me!

J


Too funny..
__________________
In Memory of JJ Irani
G.J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 10:43 PM   #4
Ivy League
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 448
Seiko? Ya gotta be kiddin'!
Ivy League is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 10:47 PM   #5
marshallr47
"TRF" Member
 
marshallr47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
Rolex are great watches but not the best thats out there. I think most of us know that. I bought one because it's durable and looks great. Seiko also makes a great watch. Very well built and also durable. I think Seiko does not have the status that Rolex has and that's why you pay less for it.
__________________
Ron
marshallr47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 10:59 PM   #6
thomaslee
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Thomas Lee
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 18
But Seiko does not hold value as well as Rolex...
thomaslee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:00 PM   #7
JimSnyder
"TRF" Member
 
JimSnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,716
Vintage Seiko auto's are way undervalued
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women."
JimSnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:01 PM   #8
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivy League View Post
Seiko? Ya gotta be kiddin'!
Well Seiko dials are very good and IMHO as good as the majority of any high end brand.Better than some especially with lume etc and how the date lines up perfect.



There is a misunderstanding in some, that people assume Seiko equals affordable/cheap. Most are undoubtedly referring to Seiko's normally found on the street in Europe and the Americas, and they are definitely a good, fantastic, value for the money and IMHO excellent dial finish. But you can also get vintage and new high end Seiko's, which, until the advent of the Internet, were relatively unknown outside of Japan. And a few other far east Asian countries (Taiwan, HK, Singapore ETC.) "King Seiko","Grand Seiko", and "Seiko Credor", you will find in these watches that, movement and case finish wise, easily compete with the best of mass produced swiss watches, i.e. Omega, Rolex, etc. As for style… well, that is in the eye of the beholder, at best they can be considered very conservative. But it really depends which movements,and watches you are comparing to. What this all boils down to is: Seiko makes some truly outstanding products, and some mediocre ones,but IMHO just like many other companies.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:02 PM   #9
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
I think Rolex still has more attention to detail than Seiko and the manafacturing tolerances and finishes are better. Rolex also use state of the art machinery and because they have been making the same models for years have absolutely perfrected the manafacturing process for their watches.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:10 PM   #10
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
[QUOTE=marshallr47;837803]Rolex are great watches but not the best thats out there. I think most of us know that. I bought one because it's durable and looks great. Seiko also makes a great watch. Very well built and also durable. I think Seiko does not have the status that Rolex has and that's why you pay less for it.[/QUOTE]

Give the man a prize!!!!!!

Any prize of the first shelf Ron!!!!!

That is also it comes down to....perceived value, nothing to do with quality!

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:15 PM   #11
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver View Post
I think Rolex still has more attention to detail than Seiko and the manafacturing tolerances and finishes are better. Rolex also use state of the art machinery and because they have been making the same models for years have absolutely perfrected the manafacturing process for their watches.
Maybe for there Mass produced line but there high end line IMHO easily matches the top Swiss.But sadly Seiko has not got the brand image of the likes of the top Swiss but quality wise IMHO as good if not better.

Check out the regulator adjuster on this one! .That's real quality! and there own movement tested, to a much higher spec than the Swiss COSC.These watches are mainly hand assembled and they guarantee parts and service for 50 plus years.




__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:18 PM   #12
oneillba
"TRF" Member
 
oneillba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbits76 View Post
I don't know about Rolex being perfect but I know I am. At least that is what my mother tells me!

J
x2. My mom told me the same thing, and yes, that I was handsome too.
__________________

My Trusty TT DJ
oneillba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:26 PM   #13
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
You are Brian and don't ever let anybody tell you different

Jim
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:27 PM   #14
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Maybe for there Mass produced line but there high end line IMHO easily matches the top Swiss.But sadly Seiko has not got the brand image of the likes of the top Swiss but quality wise IMHO as good if not better.

Check out the regulator adjuster on this one! .That's real quality! and there own movement tested, to a much higher spec than the Swiss COSC.These watches are mainly hand assembled and they guarantee parts and service for 50 plus years.




Would it be presumptious in thinking the S & F on the movemnt mean slower or faster???????

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:29 PM   #15
Lamone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
Rolex could perfect their watches, starting with a better/brighter LUM.
Lamone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:50 PM   #16
Rolexitis
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Earth
Watch: 114060
Posts: 3,203
NOTHING is perfect my friend
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Rolexitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 11:52 PM   #17
Russ1974
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Watch: BiMetal Daytona
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by oneillba View Post
x2. My mom told me the same thing, and yes, that I was handsome too.
Well, both of your mums told me the same thing ...
Russ1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2008, 12:12 AM   #18
kiasunkiasi
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 101
I won't say Seiko cannot match Rolex and any other Swiss timepieces, bacause Seiko won 4th to 10th positions in the Geneva Observatory Competition in 1968.
kiasunkiasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 November 2008, 12:24 AM   #19
JimSnyder
"TRF" Member
 
JimSnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiasunkiasi View Post
I won't say Seiko cannot match Rolex and any other Swiss timepieces, bacause Seiko won 4th to 10th positions in the Geneva Observatory Competition in 1968.
And then the Competition was closed to only Swiss makers
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women."
JimSnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.