ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2018, 04:14 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: London, UK
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 114
|
Which Explorer 214270 is looking more classic
The one with white gold 3,6,9 or the luminous 3,6,9.
|
9 October 2018, 04:20 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: VTNR, 214270, FXD
Posts: 442
|
They both look great to me. I have the full lume and I prefer it. Both are amazing watches and you can't go wrong with either.
|
9 October 2018, 04:27 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,385
|
The full lume one ... just like the vintage explorers,
|
9 October 2018, 04:59 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 173
|
Full lume, Rolex changed the hands and are more in keeping with the size of the watch compared to the first version.
|
9 October 2018, 05:00 AM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,844
|
Another vote for the full lume; looks modern and still true to its classic roots.
|
9 October 2018, 05:26 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 66
|
I think the full lume is closer to the 1016. The white gold one is closer to the black out explorer. Both classics, comes down to personal preference.
|
9 October 2018, 07:26 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: James
Location: Wimbledon, London
Posts: 451
|
This is my watch on a MN Strap... its the 39mm with full lume and I think it look fantastic. Looks classic imo on this strap!
|
9 October 2018, 08:23 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,202
|
Neither of them are the “classic” size, so just get the one you prefer.
|
9 October 2018, 08:33 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
The Mark 1 is quirky. The Mark 2 is classic. I've said before, and I'll say it again: if Rolex had put out the full lume dial and properly proportioned hands in 2010, we wouldn't be having this discussion, because that would still be the available version today. Purists might still have complained about the case size, but nobody would have been complaining that the hands or numerals were wrong and needed to be corrected.
|
9 October 2018, 09:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,587
|
I had the mk1 and am ashamed to admit I allowed the forum chatter about the hands to get inside my head. I don't think I even knew there were 2 versions when I bought it. I couldn't unsee the "flaw" and eventually flipped it for a black Milgauss.
A year later the Milgauss is off to a new home and I have a mk2 Explorer that I wear more than anything else I own. I loved the Milgauss, just not quite as much as the Explorer due to it's unmatched versatility. The perfect Explorer I for me would be a mk1 with mk2 hands. I think I'm over the T-rex hands thing so I'd be happy with either version today. 39mm is a good size for me so I never even considered the 36mm 114270. Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk |
9 October 2018, 10:55 AM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,407
|
I had the white gold version, but I prefer the lume dial.
|
9 October 2018, 12:51 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
|
I like the full lume. A little more classic to me.
|
9 October 2018, 12:57 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: 214270
Posts: 7
|
Full lume. Easier to read in sunlight compared with polished white gold.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.