![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 469
|
18k Oyster (i.e. 16618) is hollow!
Many have debated whether the 18k sub oyster bracelet has hollow links. We know that the SS and SS/18k are hollow as it is obvious from looking at the side of the bracelet and seeing the empty space. I performed a little experiment and learned that all 18k oyster bracelets are not solid gold all the way through (likely the center portion of the link). This may not apply to the new GMTIIc or 116618 as I don't have one to do the check.
Here's what I did: Specific gravity of 18k gold is 15.58 g/mL Weight of 18 sub bracelet is approx. 84.3g Volume is 10mL (+/- 0.2 m/L) - used beakers and flasks. Approximate density is 8.43 g/mL (obviously less than 15.58 g/mL had it been solid). The watch bracelet would weigh about 155 grams if all links were solid. If you look at the side of the bracelet, it looks as if though it is solid because it doesn't have the center link spaces like on other subs (16610 or 16613), but Rolex figured out a way to cheat and make it hollow w/o the appearance of being hollow. I tried the density experiment with other 18k jewelry (that I knew was not hollow) and always got 15.4 - 15.8 g/mL. I don't know about everyone else, but it's pretty CHEAP of Rolex to scam the gold off a watch that was selling for 20k new. FYI, you can do the experiment yourself if you have mL measuring cups, etc, a scale (grams) and some time. The densities of gold (yellow only) are as follows: 24k=19.32, 18k=15.58, 14k=13.07 & 10k=11.57. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,399
|
You have waaaaaaaay too much time on your hands! Thanks for the info though,
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of you
Posts: 108
|
Well well, interesting indeed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
|
the cases are not exactly solid either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
|
This would fall in the same category with Rolex's quality control -or- they are blatantly charging high prices for a weak bracelet and deceiving the public on their gold models as well.
Rolex has such a great history with their watches. In today's society, it is outrageous for them to charge the prices they do in return for this.....good find!.. to the OP. Maybe you should post this in the watch review forum as well. I wonder if this is the same with their newer jubilee bracelets. From owners' reviews and pictures the newer jubilee looks amazing! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 469
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 593
|
Very interesting. I knew there were good reasons to like the Jubilee bracelet. Harder for them to cheat that one, I believe.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 472
|
Quote:
I would not question or doubt Dalton, he works with restoring Rolex cases daily. Yes we all have seen the solid ingot claim in the rolex booklet, but that was in a bygone era. I deal with Gold all day, nothing in assay is relative to the stamping, 18K never assay's at .750 and 14K never assay's at 58.5% gold 54 - 56% is the best you can hope for. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Interesting. Thanks for the info.
__________________
Ron |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Noom
Location: Oman
Posts: 6
|
Rolex gold bracelet is not made of a solid gold. Because gold is too weak. It will become loose faster and yet it is too heavy. In stead they use a high quality gold plate. The bracelet is then lighter, more comfortable to wear and stronger. It will last a life time without fade. But they just command a high premium for their high quality gold plate (can't justify if it's too high). They don't cheat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
Rolex cases most certainly are stamped from ingots of 18K, platinum or (904L) stainless--certainly, cases are clearly not "Solid" in the sense they must be machined out to contain a movement/dial, etc (the same as any watch, obviously!). But, naturally, the screw-down back is also of the same material as the case, and varies in thickness from one model to the other (the SUb for example, will be thicker than the Day-Date or Datejust, which have lower WR ratings).
As for bracelets, its well-known that certain older Rolex models--the Day-Date with President bracelet being a good example--had capped 18K gold links---real gold to be sure, but yes, less of it that had the link been solid all the way through. New Day-Dates, from I believe...2000 onward...have featured new bracelets that dispense with the capping, and are completely solid. I would think Oyster and Jubilee bracelets from the same time frame would also conform to the new, more expensive construction. Still, even the "old" bracelets were made from 18K gold, and not some plated substitute. Going way back in time, while Rolex has made some "gold-filled" models, and others in 14K (and even 9K, going back to the 20's/30's/40's) gold, they don't employ gold electroplating for anything. To be honest, even TAG Heuer, who made loads of somewhat cheesy plated watches back in the 80's, has largely dispensed with plating, except in some models within their entry-level collections like the Aquaracer, etc.---TAG Heuer's expanded "higher-end" lines like the Carrera now offer watches in 18K gold cases, to reflect their push to create a more upmarket brand image ("more Heuer, less TAG" you might say). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
Not trying to spoil the delightful tingle of some brewing luxury watch conspiracy theory...but our friend Noom here is misinformed on this issue, plain and simple.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Noom
Location: Oman
Posts: 6
|
Adam,
You are not spoiling anything. It's kind of sharing information which is a positive thing. Then I think I used the wrong English term. In stead of a high quality gold plated it should called a "gold capped" which is a thick layer of gold wrapping the steel. In my language we call "a thick gold plated". In 1993 the local gold Smith quoted the price of making a solid gold bracelet to replace a real Rolex bracelet of a Gold lady DJ of my mom which he said made of a "gold plated" (in my language term). Still remember that the price of the real solid gold bracelet he quoted was cheaper than the Rolax capped gold bracelet (back then). So she didn't change to use a cheaper one eventually. Noom |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
To address pre v. post 2000 bracelets (such as in the President model), the Oyster does not apply as even the M 16618 Sub has the same gram weight as the bracelet I tested. This information regarding weight was kindly obtained by asking jewelers and watch sellers to submit the weights of the oyster 18k bracelets (ALL BEING OF SAME WEIGHT) through out a broad range of dates (including 2008 models). I did not test the 116618 (2009) model as the equation changes due to the new style clasp although the density test can still be performed if one wants to know. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Noom
Location: Oman
Posts: 6
|
if a solid 18k gold in your term mean that it is a real gold, yes, it is. And yes I know what you mean by hollow link which to what I know it's not hollow. It's a solid pieace of metal of steel inside with a solid gold outside (yes, maybe like the gold crown). However, you may be right I might be wrong. One thing for sure, It's not a solid pieace of full gold. And I believe that Rolex has good reason. Still remember seeing one of my mom friends who did change a president gold bracelet to local gold Smith made solid gold bracelet (a solid pieace of full gold) had problem of the bracelet became loose too soon and it is heavier than a Rolex gold bracelet. It's clear that Rolex bracelet is a good quality. I'm also sure that it's not easy to make. My bottom line is Rolex don't cheat.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,379
|
![]() ![]() You guys have way too much time on your hands....and unusual testing methods.......... The older center links were made from drawn, seamless tubing. The links were cut to the proper length, and then pressed, or formed into the flat shape of a link...this resulted in a "hollow" center for the link pins to fit through.. The new ones start as a solid piece (yes, solid) of 18k gold, (or SS) formed in the shape of a very, very wide link, then cut to proper width. The piece is then machined with a single hole in one end for the single stud or screw pin, and the other end is machined with an elongatated, double hole because that end (the end you don't see) has two studs in it to hold it in position at the fixed end.. So, the only difference between the "hollow" links and the "solid" links is that the solids have a thin web between the single hole and the elongated double hole.. The solid center links aren't really "solid" because the three studs that hold the bracelet together have to go through them, but then there isn't any attempt at deception, or "cheating" anybody either.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Rye
Location: Japan
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area
Watch: 116520
Posts: 256
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Mole "Time is inseparable from existence for us ... It enables the real world not simply to be, but to become." Prof. Albert Facquard Inaugural Conference of the 12th International Chronometer Congress, October 2004. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
|
the lugs on the case have been hollowed out-you can see that in the picture of the empty case in the Rolex booklet you get with the watch. I am not too impressed with that I must say!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Yoda
Location: USA
Posts: 468
|
pre 2008 link is hollow...
I badly dented a link and when they were trying to smooth the link down past the dent, they cut through to the center hole of the hollow link. $2700 for rolex to fix.
__________________
"The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker." Voltaire ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
Regarding pre or post 2000, there is no difference in 18k sub bracelet weights - 2009 may be different. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
![]() Although the nice part about gold is that some damage can be repaired by a jeweler with less cost. Gold is relatively easy to work with and filling holes or mending breaks can often be performed locally without the expense of sending it to Rolex. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 472
|
Quote:
Rolex made Gold Filled watches into the 60's and used a gold cap over SS in the Zephyr (precision and date) models into the early 70's I sold a pair of gold capped oysters about a year back. Now Tudors were electroplated, but a Tudor is NOT a rolex, just their lower / entry line |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Most can probably feel the difference of the "solid" vs "hollow" links if the bracelet is handled. I like the heavier feel of solid links but other than the polished center links in some models, the look are almost identical.
![]()
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.