ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 April 2018, 03:35 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
|
16 April 2018, 03:40 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,391
|
Bought my 1st GMT in '74 for £200.......
Today......must be better investment than Gold or early Marvel Comix! Sincere apologies to all for mentioning the dreaded 'I' word. |
16 April 2018, 04:18 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 992
|
It is getting out of hand, it roughly started after the Brexit, any links you think? This is no longer a grey market, it has become a dark dark grey market, almost black.
|
16 April 2018, 04:37 PM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
How bad do you want it?
|
16 April 2018, 06:53 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,391
|
|
16 April 2018, 07:34 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
Quote:
The options for said person would be to (i) get on a waiting list that can (literally) be several years long; or (ii) pay a premium (and even premium-plus) price to get the item now. For some of these people, their time is worth more than waiting years for a simple watch, and they view an extra 2-5,000 Dollars/Pounds as being a small token to pay for short-circuiting a protracted waiting period. Thus, it’s a choice of being (i) foolish by paying thousands more above the RRP for a watch; or (ii) foolish by subjecting oneself to uncharacteristically long wait times for a mass-produced item. They opted for the former. I personally wouldn’t pay that much above RRP for a mass-produced item, but I wouldn’t call those who would foolish. After all, I’m certain there are many who think WE are foolish spending thousands of Dollars on a watch that can do much less than an Apple Watch costing fractions less ... |
|
16 April 2018, 07:50 PM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,133
|
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
16 April 2018, 07:53 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: essex
Watch: 16570/214270
Posts: 191
|
to put it in perspective I looked at a mint sub c date 2 weeks ago (think it was a 2017 if I recall) and that was up for £6500. Shows how much they are chancing their arm!
|
16 April 2018, 07:56 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
I have a slightly different view on this to be honest. Compared with other brands, Rolex retail pricing is currently ridiculously competitive.
At one end of the scale, look at the price of recently launched Bremont models; I'm a big fan of Bremont but their latest release at £4,700 ish is only about £1k cheaper than a Sub, and I believe the Sub to be a far superior watch. The same is true of Omega; I have a Speedmaster and like/appreciate the brand, but Rolex is superior in my view. And yet, Omega prices seem to have gone North very quickly. Ok the other hand, look at AP and Patek. The retail price of a 15710st is £16k - I love the watch (and have one) but it's not £10k more watch than a Sub. And a 5711 is certainly not c.£15k more watch than a Sub. Basically, Rolex low retail pricing is skewing the view of grey market prices. If Rolex were to apply a 30% - 40% price increase, it would (a) out then back in the space they should occupy directly between Omega and AP, and (b) would remove ridiculous grey market premiums. And maybe (c) would normalise supply and demand. I don't think £8.5k for a Sub is crazy, it just seems crazy to pay that much because it retails at far less. Of course, there is a debate about the cost of watches overall, but that's a different debate. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
16 April 2018, 08:00 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
i agree with this 100%. Rolex is the value option among most high end watch brands considering what you pay vs what you get. They could easily have retail considerably higher and still be a good buy vs most other brands.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
16 April 2018, 09:15 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Seoul
Posts: 43
|
Yeah, but still. GBP 8500 for a preowned(albeit probably like new) SubC? That’s one step short of robbery.
|
16 April 2018, 10:19 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
Quote:
The point I was trying to make above is that for some people paying a big premium is absolute folly, but for others being on a multi-month/year waitlist for a watch is just as foolish. |
|
16 April 2018, 10:24 PM | #43 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,418
|
What is the waiting time in the UK? What is your time worth? Just saying.
__________________
|
16 April 2018, 10:39 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Vince
Location: Michigan
Posts: 547
|
I‘m not too familiar with the specifics of the supply/demand situation in the UK (Brexit?), but it‘s about time, Rolex puts an end to this. I‘m happy to see prices rise and everything, but things getting too hot might eventually hurt them.
__________________
Have a nice day! |
16 April 2018, 10:46 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
|
16 April 2018, 11:00 PM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
So you think that Rolex should and can dictate what non-affiliated retailers/private sellers sell their watches for?? And you think that their watches being sold by others at above retail price will ruin them?? I think Rolex will be licking their lips right now!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
|
16 April 2018, 11:09 PM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Vince
Location: Michigan
Posts: 547
|
Quote:
That being said, the point I was trying to make is that they are surely licking their lips now, but should be aware of (potential) adverse effects, down the road.
__________________
Have a nice day! |
|
16 April 2018, 11:11 PM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
I can't see that there will be any adverse effects downstream. This is pretty standard across the market with popular high end watches (Nautilus, Aquanaut, Royal Oak etc.) and indeed high end premium goods across the board. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
|
16 April 2018, 11:26 PM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: US
Posts: 84
|
Just to be clear I posted this because I was shocked at the price, I’m not interested, I’ve already got the exact same watch!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 April 2018, 11:30 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Vince
Location: Michigan
Posts: 547
|
Fair take. For your above mentioned watches, I agree, they are inherently hot/limited and Rolex currently does an excellent job, promoting their upper-end pieces by constraining supply at the base (SubC). That being said, I am concerned that this artificial environment might bring about challenges, but we shall see. Will definitely be interesting to watch things develop.
__________________
Have a nice day! |
17 April 2018, 12:07 AM | #51 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Watch: 116610LN & 214270
Posts: 492
|
|
17 April 2018, 03:10 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bi coastal
Watch: Ok...Watching
Posts: 937
|
Uh...I miss the joke?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...rm=ridonculous I’ve never had to google definitions until I got on rolexforums |
17 April 2018, 03:13 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: Various
Posts: 5,082
|
Jewelry shops, pawn shops always mark up their products. Gives you plenty of room to bargain!
|
17 April 2018, 03:24 AM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.