![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Japan
Posts: 252
|
Omega has done some amazing and remarkable things through its long and storied history. The bracelet on that seamaster is not one of them though…
And I’ll echo what many have said above… the subs, while both beautiful, are redundant. Lose the one with the date. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,919
|
Gotta be one of the Subs in my mind, probably Sub due to non SEL as people mentioned.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Here and There
Posts: 721
|
Sub Date or Explorer + Seamaster
Keep Submariner and Speedmaster for sure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Here and There
Posts: 721
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,458
|
not considering the value of the 16610 and 16040
and you like each one i would move the seamaster and explorer 1 on the downside the seamaster diver is technologically advanced. without these 2 you would still have a nice collection |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub, DJ36 & BB54
Posts: 1,766
|
Keep the Speedie, ditch the Speedmaster.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,357
|
Exp.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,382
|
Seamaster doesn't belong in the group, imho.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 147
|
I’d sell the Omegas, lovely watches but easier to replace
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 128
|
![]() Good luck with your decision. Had to show this beauty again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,065
|
I'd sell the Sub Date, IMHO the classic Submariner is the one to keep it is just such a great looking watch, this leaves you with a great collection, one that is balanced and has diversity.
Whatever you do it will be a tough choice to make and the differences of opinion on here will help you not one jot.
__________________
Martin Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 62
|
Seamaster, then sub date
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bursa
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 493
|
“Both Omegas” +1
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Watch: 116500,116610
Posts: 108
|
Part away with the Speedy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub, GMT
Posts: 712
|
You seem to have a type! I don't think myself, or anyone on this thread can make this decision for you. But I'd personally get rid of one of the subs, probably the 14060. You don't need both.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,201
|
Sub no date, you have the Sub Date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
I know the Seamaster is no Rolex, but I don't think that particular model is quite the dud everyone is saying it is. It looks like it is the Tokyo Olympic model that frequently sells above MSRP, and might not be as easy to replace as the white dial/black bezel version. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 2,100
|
Need to part with something - tough
Thanks all so much for inputs. I see the feedback is as scattered as my own thoughts, so I guess I’m not crazy for being right on the fence.
To respond to a few points. Yes this is the Tokyo edition with the blue bezel. I am quite attached to it. I think I’ve decided the 14060m is out of contention now. The value thing I get and it does matter to me but it is not the complete equation. When I say I’m on the fence that already takes value considerations into account. Will keep reflecting. Don’t want to make a mistake. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 831
|
Get rid of the Omega's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Colorado
Posts: 90
|
Variety of opinions here, so I'll add mine. Keep the Seamaster because it is the only watch in your collection with any color. Sell one of the Subs or the Speedy. Three black dial, black bezel, steel bracelet watches is too many.
Personally, I'd keep the Speedy and throw it on a leather strap instead of the bracelet. I'd ditch the no-date Sub because you would still have a non-cyclops Rolex with the Explorer. This would leave you with the most diverse range of options, style wise. Really no bad choice here though as these are all great watches. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 342
|
Both Omegas and they can be re-acquired easily.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,224
|
Easy one. Explorer
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 181
|
Speedy is the only watch I have ever regretted getting rid of……..
I would lose the explorer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex GMT Master 2
Posts: 723
|
I’d be getting rid of the white Omega SMP. No chance I’d ever be selling any discontinued Rolex sports watches.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 128
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,840
|
Seamaster and sub date.
__________________
. Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,019
|
The Omegas will be a lot easier (and affordable) to replace with something similar at msrp if you ever wanted to reacquire.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: England
Posts: 415
|
Anyone saying part with a Rolex is nuts. Get rid of the omegas.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 355
|
Sub date has to go
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex GMT Master 2
Posts: 723
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.