The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 February 2010, 01:34 AM   #1
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Is the SD 4000 really that heavy?

Guys, I'm really starting to lean towards the SD vs. the Sub date. However, I'm been reading comments pertaining to the 'top-heaviness' of the watch. Is it that bad? At this point, it's difficult to find one with any AD around my area, since the Deep Sea replaced it. I wear the GMTIIc now. I know the SD would be much heavier, but to what extent?
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 01:40 AM   #2
rolexsubdate
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
once you put it on, you will not feel it ... it is very subtle...
rolexsubdate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 01:59 AM   #3
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I own both, and it is subtle, but the SD is top heavy and sits "higher" on a wrist. The Sub Date sits noticeably flatter, and is more comfortable (at least for me).
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 03:24 AM   #4
towernick
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 880
Not heavy at all in my opinion, having both a SD and a Sub, I like the way the SD feels on my wrist more.
towernick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 03:42 AM   #5
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,918
The SD comparison to the 16610 is only minor by weight and height!!
Once on your wrist,you wont even know....
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:01 AM   #6
snowbird
"TRF" Member
 
snowbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 2,157
Personally I find the SD to be more comfortable than the Sub but of course it's an individual matter which will fit better. It's a little heavier but I don't really notice that on my wrist.
snowbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:11 AM   #7
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by nauticajoe View Post
Guys, I'm really starting to lean towards the SD vs. the Sub date. However, I'm been reading comments pertaining to the 'top-heaviness' of the watch. Is it that bad? At this point, it's difficult to find one with any AD around my area, since the Deep Sea replaced it. I wear the GMTIIc now. I know the SD would be much heavier, but to what extent?
Myself when on wrist cannot feel any difference between Sub or SD
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:12 AM   #8
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Yes the SD does feel abit top heavy initially whenever I put it on as compared to the Explorer II but the feeling goes away in a few minutes. Not a problem at all, overall a pretty well balanced watch.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:13 AM   #9
scoobydoo
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: MD
Location: Central, PA
Watch: The "Hulk"
Posts: 115
For me, it is top heavy and I have to wear it tight. Otherwise, it is flopping all over the place. And yes. . . it does sit high.
scoobydoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:14 AM   #10
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
A little bit as compared to the Explorer II but that feeling goes away in a few minutes. Overall it's a pretty well balanced watch.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:15 AM   #11
dysert
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 192
SD is comfortable on my wrist

SD is very comfortable on my wrist. You will feel the weight at first but then you won't notice at all. Your shirt sleeves may hang on it if they are tight.
dysert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:20 AM   #12
theken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
The SDDS for me is like wearing a Panerai.
If you like a 44mm Panerai, I think you will like the SDDS.
If you do not like the 44mm Panerai, you probably will not like the SDDS.
theken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:22 AM   #13
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by theken View Post
The SDDS for me is like wearing a Panerai.
If you like a 44mm Panerai, I think you will like the SDDS.
If you do not like the 44mm Panerai, you probably will not like the SDDS.
He's talking about the SeaDweller not the Deep Sea Sea Dweller.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 04:24 AM   #14
RolexCat
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Ron
Location: Michigan
Watch: SD
Posts: 318
Nope. Sits just fine on my wrist. Ron
RolexCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2010, 05:15 AM   #15
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Guys, thanks for the feedback. I think this will be my next purchase because it would contrast my 1st - GMTIIc. I've got a grey dealer selling me a '98 (new but old stock). I may opt for either the D or M series only because it has the better lume & sel.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.