ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 June 2005, 10:55 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Who Me?
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: out
Posts: 4,616
|
Oyster Quartz
I have never really thought about owning one of these but, are they as accurate as other quartz watches?
If you were to see one would you first say it's a fake cuz "Rolez don't make quartz" or relize it really is a Rolex and seriously look at it? |
1 June 2005, 11:02 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,900
|
I almost bought one about 2 years ago, but it got away from me. Now, though, I'm not sure I'd go for one because I wouldn't want to worry about the battery going on me at an inopportune time or at any time, because then you have to take it in to a jeweler to have them change it and maybe do some adjustment on the watch. I'll stick with the automatics, even though it means having to have multiple winders. Right now, for example, I have a quad, a triple, and a single winder running. I have a triple winder that I keep in reserve in case one of the others goes down.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
1 June 2005, 11:19 PM | #3 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
|
I love the bracelet and will probably get one for my collection eventually.
They are said to be one of if not the best quartz movement ever built. I don't know this for a fact though. |
1 June 2005, 11:31 PM | #4 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Alex
Location: New York
Watch: me carefully
Posts: 377
|
I cant really say that they are my cup of tea.
I like the way they look but for me a major part of my love for Rolex is the movement. Not that if you want to get me one for my B-day Earl I wouldnt wear it!! |
1 June 2005, 11:39 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Who Me?
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: out
Posts: 4,616
|
OK I'll get you one if you get me a DD deal?
|
3 June 2005, 03:03 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: norcal - city by the bay
Posts: 12
|
you DEFINITELY know its a rolex when you look at one
up close. you'd never know it was a quartz if i covered up everything but the dial if not for the word 'oysterquartz.' it's crisp and clean like any other rolex datejust dial.
< shark >>>< Last edited by thesharkman; 4 June 2005 at 04:33 PM.. |
19 October 2008, 12:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
I'd love to get a Rolex quartz at some stage. I've read the movement was quite advanced in it's day.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
20 October 2008, 12:21 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
I hope to have one some day.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
20 October 2008, 12:35 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
The most accurate of all ROLEX watches EVER.
|
20 October 2008, 01:15 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
aesthetically, i don't quite like it compared to the classic oyster case and bracelet, but under the hood exists one of the finest quartz movements ever made. (well, maybe the seiko 9f might get the nod here?) i would love to see rolex resurrect it.
|
20 October 2008, 01:32 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Wow, the first 4 posts were all from Moderators!
I personally don't think quartz watches worth much $$ since the mechanism is so much cheaper than a good mechanical one.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
20 October 2008, 01:49 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
a good link:
|
20 October 2008, 02:03 PM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
OK
I am intrigued and I am looking... Surely someone has some ideas on where one might find a steal of a deal on one... Ebay is never the best bet. Id LOVE the DD BUT I think thats still out of my budget.... Perhaps a TT. For some reason the SS just still doesnt look like a Rolex to me (and usually I am partial to SS vs TT)
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
20 October 2008, 02:31 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 213
|
Did someone say Oysterquartz?
I find the Oysterquartz to be an absolute cracker of a watch! For accuracy, nothing comes close. Had an Omega X-33 once but let it go. My Oysterquartz beats it for accuracy, easily! The Oysterquartz is a loud watch too. The ticking is very noticeable. While some might think it a minus, I think it gives the watch it's own special character. On one hand the styling of the Oysterquatz is very retro and on the other, very modern. Compare the case and bracelet design to IWC Ingenieurs and AP Royal Oaks. Similar huh? Gerald Genta-ish? Another benefit of the Oysterquartz is that it's every bit as antimagnetic as a Milgauss. Amazing for a quartz huh? Anyway, while I love my handwinds and automatics, my Rolex quartz has a very special place in my collection! Kind regards Chris in Melbourne |
20 October 2008, 02:40 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
|
I was recently offered a TT Oysterquartz for $1500. The novelty of the Oysterquartz is attractive, but I think I'd enjoy a Submariner or Sea-Dweller more. The guy with the Oysterquartz seems to think it will eventually become collectible, but admitted that there isn't much interest in them at the moment. I do find the case interesting, and different than other Rolex offerings.
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986 |
20 October 2008, 02:41 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,188
|
Very nice, and quite a collectible piece. :D
|
20 October 2008, 03:04 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
|
Don't like batteries.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves. Rolexers do it with perpetual movements. |
20 October 2008, 03:17 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Tissot, c. 1960
Posts: 34,434
|
Chris in Melbourne
That's a beautiful piece. It's decidedly Rolex, but distinctively different. |
20 October 2008, 06:25 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 213
|
Thanks Grady!
|
20 October 2008, 08:22 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
Chris in Melbourne
Now THAT is what I'm talking about. That is a beauty! Definitely going to get one of those one day.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
20 October 2008, 09:22 PM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
I purchased this OysterQuartz about 3 years ago, a 1979 pre-COSC without the billboard on the dial. Unfortunately the seller had not disclosed the scratch on the dial just below the coronet, and the watch was returned. I'd still like to have another some day, I love the case and bracelet design.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
20 October 2008, 10:23 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,946
|
Pre Rolex own quartz movement there was about 16 Swiss companies involved in the development of the first Beta 21 quartz movement.And Bulova Accutron paid a high part in development of the step motor,the battery life then was around 12 months.And at this time Rolex could not alter the design of the beta 21 movement,to fit there Oyster case,so only stated the 5100 was water resist and not waterproof this was the first Rolex with sapphire crystal.Later they started around 1972 to develop there own movement,and the design was very still close to the beta movement,but now designed to fit a oyster type case.
The Thermo-compensated Quartz watches made by Rolex: Caliber: Rolex 5035 (and 5055 for the Day-Date model) Technology: single 32 kHz crystal using the forced constant frequency (TCVCXO) method Annual accuracy: around ±60 seconds (Rolex has never stated an official accuracy specification.) Rate adjustable?: yes, via trimmer condenser (user adjustable) Watches that use this movement: Rolex Oyster-quartz (1977 to 2001) Note 1: We are unaware of any other watch using TCVCXO technology. Note 2: While discontinued, we have heard that Rolex plans to introduce a new quartz movement with update technology and perpetual calendar. More can Ref http://www.oysterquartz.net/ Selected Grand Seiko quartz model now these were very accurate quartz model but very expensive then. Note 1: Seiko re-issued a limited edition of the "Astron" in 2000 that used a special version of the 9F movement that was rated to ± 2 seconds per year after adjustment. Now certainly by the Japanese movement accuracy was much better than the Rolex movement Note 2: The 9F movement is reportedly designed to run fifty years before it needs servicing. Note 3: Other Grand Seiko quartz models use the 8J movement. Even less is know about this movement. Source of information: Japanese retail sites And just a little bit more its possible that the new Oysterquartz could be reborn 2009 Basil Show. The Next Oysterquartz? In 2004, an Oysterquartz watch was offered at auction by Antiquorum that looked like an ordinary 17014 stainless model with the white gold bezel. Upon closer examination, however, it was clear this watch was something unique and many wondered if it was a genuine Rolex. There was no reference number on the back of the watch where one would expect to see it engraved on a typical Oysterquartz. And the watch contained a heretofore unheard of 23 jewel quartz movement marked "5335" with a date function that employed a perpetual calendar mechanism that could be completely adjusted using the crown. This mystery watch was never sold because it was pulled when Rolex told Antiquorum officials that it had been stolen from them. A civil lawsuit ensued in Switzerland between the owner of the watch and Rolex. Rolex lost this suit largely due to the testimony of former and current Rolex employees who testified that it was common practise for Rolex to dispose of prototype watches by giving them to employees. Also, the fact that Rolex had never reported the watch to the police as stolen didn't help their case. The publicity surrounding the trial served to confirm the authenticity and provenance of this watch and ensure its value as a collector's piece when it is eventually offered for sale again. Prototype Oysterquartz Day-Date Perpetual Calendar Thanks to a former Rolex insider (who no longer works for Rolex), I am able to confirm not only the existence of the Oysterquartz Perpetual Calendar, but give some details about this watch, which is without doubt the rarest Oysterquartz ever produced by Rolex. Approximately eleven prototype Oysterquartz Perpetual Calendar watches were produced. They were produced in Datejust and Day-Date versions. All prototypes were encased in 17014 SS cases with white gold bezels. No external reference numbers were engraved on the cases. The movement used in the Datejust model was designated the 5335 and had 23 jewels. The movement used in the Day-Date model was designated the 5355 and had 23 jewels. The movement is silent, with no audible tic (a marked difference from the original Oysterquartz). The perpetual calendar function of this watch was patented by Rolex: Swiss Patent number CH 672 222 G A3. The 5335 movement used in the Oysterquartz Perpetual Calendar, the lack of a battery compartment,and a Rolex coronet on the gold battery contact. Now don't forget there are quite a lot of mechanical parts in a quartz analogue watch.The same drive train as the cal 3135 less the balance and escapement and main spring.Its main spring is the battery and escapement the quartz crystal. And the quartz movement is more expensive than its mechanical brother.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
21 October 2008, 12:45 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Nice read, Padi.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
21 October 2008, 11:43 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,073
|
Loved mine before I sold it. Had all the boxes, papers and tags. I think the full package deal is where this watch will hold collectibility in the future.
But sold mine for a couple reasons, one I heard overhauls were expensive and unsure how long Rolex will service it. But the other reason is I like to wear my watches without worring about them. As the OQ case has sharp edges, if you were to need a polish, you will lose the crisp lines. I didn't like this and did not like having to be "careful" when wearing it. |
12 February 2022, 07:27 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 25
|
Ohh,That's a beautiful piece.
|
12 February 2022, 07:29 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 907
|
OQ Day Date is on my bucket list.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 Rolex Explorer 224270 Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich Panerai PAM00111 2 Factor Authentication |
12 February 2022, 08:07 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Real Name: Paul
Location: ohio
Watch: 16570 black
Posts: 492
|
I never cared for the oysterquartz. The styling just never did it for me. I love the sweep second hand of the mechanicals.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.