ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

leopardprey · 25 January 2007, 07:38 PM

Any opinions or thoughts on the new maxi dial and larger hands, such as the SUB LV and GMT II TT has?

Thanks.

mike · 25 January 2007, 09:16 PM

I think they're something whose time as come.

Any watch whose basis is that of a tool watch concept benefits by the enhanced readability of the maxi in adverse conditions.

padi56 · 25 January 2007, 10:52 PM

Got to agree with Mike on this,but the maxi dials are not something new, quite a few of the vintage sports Rolex had maxi dials too.

leopardprey · 26 January 2007, 12:15 AM

What Vintage models, Padi? Thanks.

BHE · 26 January 2007, 12:26 AM

Luminosity and readability are improved with the Maxi dial. It was a great addition to the LV Sub!

Welshwatchman · 26 January 2007, 03:32 AM

I think the maxi dial has always looked better, vintage or modern.

viper · 26 January 2007, 03:41 AM

i agree, that little bit more really makes a huge difference IMO

JJ Irani · 26 January 2007, 04:17 AM

While I have had the pleasure of owning a maxi dial watch, I still prefer the standard hands and markers.....more gold and less blobs!!

Edensknight · 26 January 2007, 04:21 AM

[QUOTE=mike;168398]I think they're something whose time as come.

Any watch whose basis is that of a tool watch concept benefits by the enhanced readability of the maxi in adverse conditions.

Well stated, Mike!

Spencer · 26 January 2007, 05:16 AM

I love it

tonelar · 26 January 2007, 05:28 AM

did the vintage watches look maxi, because they didn't have the surrounds that later models had, so their lume markers had larger footprints?

i.e. when rolex decided to surround the lumes with WG, did they actually try to keep the overall marker dimension the same, making the lume sections smaller?

slim · 26 January 2007, 05:36 AM

I love the Maxi Dial and large min hands.

mike · 26 January 2007, 08:04 AM

Comparison

leopardprey · 26 January 2007, 10:55 AM

Ok, you all and Mike's photos convinced me. With the help of Slim, I picked up a BNIB Z model Sub LV for $5525.

A. Jacobs · 26 January 2007, 11:06 AM

I doubt that my Rolex and I will ever be in adverse conditions, so I have to say that I like the less cluttered look of the standard dial.

mike · 26 January 2007, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leopardprey

Ok, you all and Mike's photos convinced me. With the help of Slim, I picked up a BNIB Z model Sub LV for $5525.

Big congrats!!

You'll love it!

BHE · 26 January 2007, 11:36 AM

Great choice!

tonelar · 26 January 2007, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leopardprey

Ok, you all and Mike's photos convinced me. With the help of Slim, I picked up a BNIB Z model Sub LV for $5525.

Wear it in good health...

Ain't the green lovely?

leopardprey · 26 January 2007, 11:59 AM

Ok, if I want to change out a Black bezel insert down the road, where can you buy one? Black for night ops, and Green for Woodland ops (LOL LOL LOL)

25 January 2007, 07:38 PM	#1
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	Opinions on Maxi Dial and Large Min. Hand on LVs and new GMTs Any opinions or thoughts on the new maxi dial and larger hands, such as the SUB LV and GMT II TT has? Thanks.

25 January 2007, 10:52 PM	#3
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,002	Got to agree with Mike on this,but the maxi dials are not something new, quite a few of the vintage sports Rolex had maxi dials too. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

26 January 2007, 03:32 AM	#6
Welshwatchman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Paul Location: Wales, UK Posts: 14,578	I think the maxi dial has always looked better, vintage or modern. __________________ ..33

26 January 2007, 04:17 AM	#8
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	While I have had the pleasure of owning a maxi dial watch, I still prefer the standard hands and markers.....more gold and less blobs!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

26 January 2007, 05:16 AM	#10
Spencer "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: US Posts: 1,338	I love it __________________ I'm a perpetual kind of guy Resident Audemars Piguet Fanatic

25 January 2007, 09:16 PM	#2
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	I think they're something whose time as come. Any watch whose basis is that of a tool watch concept benefits by the enhanced readability of the maxi in adverse conditions.

26 January 2007, 12:15 AM	#4
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	What Vintage models, Padi? Thanks.

26 January 2007, 12:26 AM	#5
BHE Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Ohio Watch: LV Sub Posts: 53	Luminosity and readability are improved with the Maxi dial. It was a great addition to the LV Sub!

26 January 2007, 03:41 AM	#7
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	i agree, that little bit more really makes a huge difference IMO

26 January 2007, 04:21 AM	#9
Edensknight Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 407	[QUOTE=mike;168398]I think they're something whose time as come. Any watch whose basis is that of a tool watch concept benefits by the enhanced readability of the maxi in adverse conditions. Well stated, Mike!

26 January 2007, 05:28 AM	#11
tonelar "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Tony Location: san francisco Watch: Seadweller Posts: 1,368	did the vintage watches look maxi, because they didn't have the surrounds that later models had, so their lume markers had larger footprints? i.e. when rolex decided to surround the lumes with WG, did they actually try to keep the overall marker dimension the same, making the lume sections smaller? __________________ It's a rarity that something popular is actually right... Wear 'em with PRIDE, y'all.

26 January 2007, 05:36 AM	#12
slim "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: los angeles/SD Watch: RG DD,SD43,Pam104 Posts: 385	I love the Maxi Dial and large min hands.

26 January 2007, 08:04 AM	#13
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Comparison

26 January 2007, 10:55 AM	#14
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	Ok, you all and Mike's photos convinced me. With the help of Slim, I picked up a BNIB Z model Sub LV for $5525.

26 January 2007, 11:06 AM	#15
A. Jacobs "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Andrew Location: Ohio Watch: SS Sub Date 16610 Posts: 629	I doubt that my Rolex and I will ever be in adverse conditions, so I have to say that I like the less cluttered look of the standard dial. __________________ Rolex Submariner 16610 "Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity."

26 January 2007, 11:36 AM	#17
BHE Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Ohio Watch: LV Sub Posts: 53	Great choice!

26 January 2007, 11:59 AM	#19
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	Ok, if I want to change out a Black bezel insert down the road, where can you buy one? Black for night ops, and Green for Woodland ops (LOL LOL LOL)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)