ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Ragu · 9 March 2007, 04:55 AM

How does this dial look to you?
It's a late '77 5mil serial #.

Alex Stylianou · 9 March 2007, 05:15 AM

it looks ok to em

Solo118 · 9 March 2007, 05:16 AM

Looks nice, and pricey

finance21 · 9 March 2007, 05:21 AM

How come the 200 is in front of the 600? Wasn't that only for the earlier models?

Alex Stylianou · 9 March 2007, 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finance21

How come the 200 is in front of the 600? Wasn't that only for the earlier models?

NOw that you mention it ...l

gmt 16750 · 9 March 2007, 06:09 AM

I would have a few issues with that watch
i.e. - the coronet looks off to me, 'SUBMARINER' should be above the depth rating for a '77 watch, the dial lume looks poorly applied, should be 660ft/200, might be just the photo's but I cannot see any 'T SWISS T' or 'SWISS T<25' at the 6 o'clock position etc...

mrbieler · 9 March 2007, 06:29 AM

I see a spotty relume job.

mikey · 9 March 2007, 06:29 AM

Where is the gasket? its fake

Ragu · 9 March 2007, 06:45 AM

what about the Swiss-T<25 not seen below the 6 ?

Spark · 9 March 2007, 07:11 AM

If the watch is genuine it must have had a dial refinish, if the dial is original the watch isn't genuine IMO.
The Feet should precede the meters on the depth rating as meters before feet was only done on very early and now very collectable watches.
The tritium would have been applied much better than that originally too.
Just my 2 cents.

Spark.

mike · 9 March 2007, 10:17 AM

You know my thoughts...

JJ Irani · 9 March 2007, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

You know my thoughts...

No Mike....we are NOT mind-readers!! Tell us how you really feel!!

Ragu · 9 March 2007, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

No Mike....we are NOT mind-readers!! Tell us how you really feel!!

JJ----->

mikey · 9 March 2007, 03:22 PM

The watch may be genuine and the dial has been refinished incorrectly. I have see genuine watches with original dials redone to whatever color customization the owner wanted.

9 March 2007, 04:55 AM	#1
Ragu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Ragu Sauce Location: Southern, FL Watch: the Sauce ;) Posts: 781	How does this look... How does this dial look to you? It's a late '77 5mil serial #. __________________ "Waiting is so time consuming" -- Unknown Proud Member #2391

9 March 2007, 06:09 AM	#6
gmt 16750 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Neil Location: Borders, Scotland Watch: what your doing. Posts: 970	I would have a few issues with that watch i.e. - the coronet looks off to me, 'SUBMARINER' should be above the depth rating for a '77 watch, the dial lume looks poorly applied, should be 660ft/200, might be just the photo's but I cannot see any 'T SWISS T' or 'SWISS T<25' at the 6 o'clock position etc... __________________

9 March 2007, 06:29 AM	#7
mrbieler "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Lost Angeles Watch: all about acrylic Posts: 683	I see a spotty relume job. __________________ - Jeff Cursimus Cum Forfex

9 March 2007, 06:45 AM	#9
Ragu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Ragu Sauce Location: Southern, FL Watch: the Sauce ;) Posts: 781	what about the Swiss-T<25 not seen below the 6 ? __________________ "Waiting is so time consuming" -- Unknown Proud Member #2391

9 March 2007, 05:15 AM	#2
Alex Stylianou "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,785	it looks ok to em

9 March 2007, 05:16 AM	#3
Solo118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,068	Looks nice, and pricey

9 March 2007, 05:21 AM	#4
finance21 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: U.S.A Posts: 363	How come the 200 is in front of the 600? Wasn't that only for the earlier models?

9 March 2007, 06:29 AM	#8
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	Where is the gasket? its fake

9 March 2007, 07:11 AM	#10
Spark "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Mark Location: U.K. Watch: Too Many Posts: 2,092	If the watch is genuine it must have had a dial refinish, if the dial is original the watch isn't genuine IMO. The Feet should precede the meters on the depth rating as meters before feet was only done on very early and now very collectable watches. The tritium would have been applied much better than that originally too. Just my 2 cents. Spark.

9 March 2007, 10:17 AM	#11
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	You know my thoughts...

9 March 2007, 03:22 PM	#14
mikey "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: Oysterdate 6694 Posts: 2,713	The watch may be genuine and the dial has been refinished incorrectly. I have see genuine watches with original dials redone to whatever color customization the owner wanted.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)