ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SCD · 4 April 2011, 07:51 AM

Saw one at a dealer yesterday. I'm smitten! This watch knows just what it wants to be, and it hits all the marks dead on. Love it!

Thanks to this great page for the lovely stolen photos...
http://jlc.watchprosite.com/?show=fo...&ti=423821&s=0

Okay enablers, please tell me why I don't need it! Ha! :)

dddrees · 4 April 2011, 10:02 AM

JLC's are definitely nice, and that one is definitely a great watch.

Aivas47a · 5 April 2011, 01:41 AM

Lovely!

liptonnr · 5 April 2011, 03:40 AM

Very nice!

Jarhead024 · 5 April 2011, 10:45 AM

I like it ! Most of my watches are typical thickness of Rolex and Omega. But I have a vintage Seiko that is very thin. On the rare occasion that I wear it, it is so light that you forget that it is on the wrist. That one is a quartz and it is hard to believe that there is room for a battery. But the JLC is very impressive fitting an automatic in that case.

Jim232118 · 5 April 2011, 10:54 AM

JLC is one of the best out there!

SCD · 5 April 2011, 03:47 PM

It's mechanical, but not automatic. Yeah...it's super-light. It comes in at a whopping 42 grams.

It's just so simple and clean. It being the case that the purpose of mechanical watches now is dubious to put it mildly, I think the technical aspect of this watch's thin-ness and the classic old-school design, so perfectly executed, really justifies it in a unique way. The sapphire case-back on this is just a clincher for me. Totally irresistible.

boa2 · 6 April 2011, 12:51 AM

It's definitely one of the more sublime watches I've had on my wrist. The hands seem to float above the dial, the watch is a great size, it has a beautiful movement, and the value is ridiculous. I hope you get it.

SCD · 6 April 2011, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boa2

I hope you get it.

I did. My collection's overgrown. I think I'll let go of my Explorer 36.

witch watch · 6 April 2011, 02:31 AM

Very nice and if your thinking of that i would also consider an Altiplano.

boa2 · 6 April 2011, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCD

I did. My collection's overgrown. I think I'll let go of my Explorer 36.

Congratulations on your new JLC!

kilyung · 6 April 2011, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by witch watch

Very nice and if your thinking of that i would also consider an Altiplano.

That Piaget is an excellent alternative to the JLC.

SCD · 6 April 2011, 02:31 PM

:) Lovin' it!

Dickson Lim · 6 April 2011, 03:10 PM

Nice and lovely watch you got it there, brother! Wear it in good health!

jatco · 7 April 2011, 01:31 PM

Thin is beautifull.. (the band in thicker than the watch.....!!)
Love it...and congrats..!!

mdtddd2007 · 8 April 2011, 05:51 AM

that is one nice thin watch. congrats...

Paracentesis · 8 April 2011, 10:13 AM

Very smart choice, lovely.

vukotab · 8 April 2011, 11:18 AM

Fantastic watch! Really understated and classically beautiful!
Huge congrats!

4 April 2011, 07:51 AM	#1
SCD "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: SF Bay Area, CA Posts: 511	Oh brother...now I want a JLC Ultra Thin 38! Saw one at a dealer yesterday. I'm smitten! This watch knows just what it wants to be, and it hits all the marks dead on. Love it! Thanks to this great page for the lovely stolen photos... http://jlc.watchprosite.com/?show=fo...&ti=423821&s=0 Okay enablers, please tell me why I don't need it! Ha! :)

4 April 2011, 10:02 AM	#2
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	JLC's are definitely nice, and that one is definitely a great watch. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

6 April 2011, 12:51 AM	#8
boa2 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Utah Watch: Lover Posts: 3,857	It's definitely one of the more sublime watches I've had on my wrist. The hands seem to float above the dial, the watch is a great size, it has a beautiful movement, and the value is ridiculous. I hope you get it. __________________ "Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."

7 April 2011, 01:31 PM	#15
jatco 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Thomas Location: YVR Watch: 116233/79190 Posts: 50,063	Thin is beautifull.. (the band in thicker than the watch.....!!) Love it...and congrats..!! __________________ . ..- ' A Crown for every achievement '

8 April 2011, 11:18 AM	#18
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	Fantastic watch! Really understated and classically beautiful! Huge congrats! __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

5 April 2011, 01:41 AM	#3
Aivas47a Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Jim Location: Dallas Watch: Love them all Posts: 225	Lovely!

5 April 2011, 03:40 AM	#4
liptonnr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Nate Location: Pottsville, PA Watch: Sub-c LV, GMT's Posts: 988	Very nice!

5 April 2011, 10:45 AM	#5
Jarhead024 Banned Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Hamilton, NJ Posts: 43	I like it ! Most of my watches are typical thickness of Rolex and Omega. But I have a vintage Seiko that is very thin. On the rare occasion that I wear it, it is so light that you forget that it is on the wrist. That one is a quartz and it is hard to believe that there is room for a battery. But the JLC is very impressive fitting an automatic in that case.

5 April 2011, 10:54 AM	#6
Jim232118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Jim Location: DFW, TX Watch: Yachtmaster II YG Posts: 276	JLC is one of the best out there!

5 April 2011, 03:47 PM	#7
SCD "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: SF Bay Area, CA Posts: 511	It's mechanical, but not automatic. Yeah...it's super-light. It comes in at a whopping 42 grams. It's just so simple and clean. It being the case that the purpose of mechanical watches now is dubious to put it mildly, I think the technical aspect of this watch's thin-ness and the classic old-school design, so perfectly executed, really justifies it in a unique way. The sapphire case-back on this is just a clincher for me. Totally irresistible.

6 April 2011, 02:31 AM	#10
witch watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Scotland Watch: Milgauss GV Posts: 1,201	Very nice and if your thinking of that i would also consider an Altiplano.

6 April 2011, 02:31 PM	#13
SCD "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: SF Bay Area, CA Posts: 511	:) Lovin' it!

6 April 2011, 03:10 PM	#14
Dickson Lim "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: planet Posts: 1,517	Nice and lovely watch you got it there, brother! Wear it in good health!

8 April 2011, 05:51 AM	#16
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,784	that is one nice thin watch. congrats...

8 April 2011, 10:13 AM	#17
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	Very smart choice, lovely.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)