ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

KBM · 27 March 2014, 01:00 PM

This gives a much better idea of how the dial looks in real life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN9gu_oZDFg

alubin · 27 March 2014, 01:08 PM

Looks awesome. Might not be able to resist this one though the price does have me

a bit. Thanks for sharing!

seand442 · 27 March 2014, 01:35 PM

I love the watch but not the price. Oh well, who am I kidding? Time to start saving.....

subtona · 27 March 2014, 01:55 PM

Really looks great!
Thanks for posting!

masterserg · 27 March 2014, 01:58 PM

That's it. Count me in! Damn!

GradyPhilpott · 27 March 2014, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kauebm

This gives a much better idea of how the dial looks in real life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN9gu_oZDFg

Wow!

660ft · 27 March 2014, 02:27 PM

Looks better in this video.

jujin · 27 March 2014, 02:28 PM

didn't show the clasp!

MP5 · 27 March 2014, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 660ft

Looks better in this video.

Looks better than dreams good. I wished he would have ratcheted it and used the glide lock. What was he thinking?

Chris B · 27 March 2014, 06:38 PM

Very nice, thanks for sharing

KBM · 27 March 2014, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jujin

didn't show the clasp!

This was also the first thing I wish he had done. If I had to guess, I would say it carries a sub c clasp, and Rolex left the super engineered one to the deepsea.

mjclark32 · 27 March 2014, 10:05 PM

Looks great

jay1988 · 27 March 2014, 10:11 PM

It looks nice but for some reason that I can't put my finger on, it doesn't seem to look the way I hoped it would.

Let's just say I won't be rushing to trade my 114060 anytime soon and it won't knock the 214270 off my shopping list.

TK-710 · 27 March 2014, 10:11 PM

I like this watch just trying to figure out if I like it that much more than a sub c date for the money. Still would like to know the thickness. As for the dial, I'm sure I'm alone on this, but I'd have liked to have seen them frame the date box with the same white gold they framed the hour markers with to make the dial a little more balanced. Obviously with a cyclops you don't have to worry about balance but I think it would have been a nice touch on the SD.

OP Thank you for the link.

TheDude · 27 March 2014, 10:33 PM

Love it, especially the dial. I will have to get used to the end links being longer than the lugs...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

KBM · 27 March 2014, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JES77

I like this watch just trying to figure out if I like it that much more than a sub c date for the money. Still would like to know the thickness. As for the dial, I'm sure I'm alone on this, but I'd have liked to have seen them frame the date box with the same white gold they framed the hour markers with to make the dial a little more balanced. Obviously with a cyclops you don't have to worry about balance but I think it would have been a nice touch on the SD.

OP Thank you for the link.

I would also love to know the thickness. My impression is that, because it is thicker, the new SD should wear larger then the Sub C (which, in turn, many say wears like a 42mm watch).

As for having white gold surrounds on the date, I believe their reasoning is to make the date as integrated to the dial as possible.

Casey VP-26 · 27 March 2014, 10:46 PM

Thank You.

Pete · 27 March 2014, 11:19 PM

love the dial on it.. yum

Psmith · 27 March 2014, 11:37 PM

Thanks

Man, I wish people would not wave watches around when videoing them

*feeling queasy*

Racerdj · 27 March 2014, 11:59 PM

Awesome job, Rolex.

Mystro · 28 March 2014, 12:09 AM

Gonna be the run away hit of the year.

SWISSAHOLICS · 28 March 2014, 12:10 AM

That dial is pretty hot.

tomchicago · 28 March 2014, 12:19 AM

i have never been a fan of any of the SD, DSSD (yet I always respected the models), but THAT WATCH IS GORGEOUS!

AK797 · 28 March 2014, 12:43 AM

I don't think a matte and often grey looking dial matches with a shiny ceramic bezel, matte bezel would be better. Also it looks a little too thick for a 40mm watch in my eyes, 42mm would have been better, and I don't need the extra WR. Subc is still my preference.

27 March 2014, 01:00 PM	#1
KBM 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,433	Great live video of the SD4C This gives a much better idea of how the dial looks in real life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN9gu_oZDFg

27 March 2014, 01:35 PM	#3
seand442 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Earth Watch: 116610 Posts: 3,455	I love the watch but not the price. Oh well, who am I kidding? Time to start saving..... __________________ NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.

27 March 2014, 01:55 PM	#4
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,255	Really looks great! Thanks for posting! __________________

27 March 2014, 01:58 PM	#5
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,436	That's it. Count me in! Damn! __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

27 March 2014, 10:05 PM	#12
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Looks great __________________

27 March 2014, 01:08 PM	#2
alubin "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: USA Watch: All please! Posts: 1,042	Looks awesome. Might not be able to resist this one though the price does have me a bit. Thanks for sharing!

27 March 2014, 02:27 PM	#7
660ft "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: LA Watch: 1680 Posts: 161	Looks better in this video.

27 March 2014, 02:28 PM	#8
jujin "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: NJ Posts: 307	didn't show the clasp!

27 March 2014, 06:38 PM	#10
Chris B "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Peterborough Posts: 9,628	Very nice, thanks for sharing

27 March 2014, 10:11 PM	#13
jay1988 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Midlands Posts: 1,515	It looks nice but for some reason that I can't put my finger on, it doesn't seem to look the way I hoped it would. Let's just say I won't be rushing to trade my 114060 anytime soon and it won't knock the 214270 off my shopping list.

27 March 2014, 10:11 PM	#14
TK-710 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Upstate Watch: 116600 Posts: 2,154	I like this watch just trying to figure out if I like it that much more than a sub c date for the money. Still would like to know the thickness. As for the dial, I'm sure I'm alone on this, but I'd have liked to have seen them frame the date box with the same white gold they framed the hour markers with to make the dial a little more balanced. Obviously with a cyclops you don't have to worry about balance but I think it would have been a nice touch on the SD. OP Thank you for the link.

27 March 2014, 10:33 PM	#15
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	Love it, especially the dial. I will have to get used to the end links being longer than the lugs... Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

27 March 2014, 10:46 PM	#17
Casey VP-26 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: America Posts: 2,708	Thank You.

27 March 2014, 11:19 PM	#18
Pete "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Real Name: Pete Location: Guelph Watch: 16610/216570 Posts: 678	love the dial on it.. yum __________________ Pete - Guelph ON - 16610 D / 216570 Member #745 RIP JJ "Always in our hearts, and on our wrists" "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul"

27 March 2014, 11:37 PM	#19
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Thanks Man, I wish people would not wave watches around when videoing them feeling queasy __________________

27 March 2014, 11:59 PM	#20
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Awesome job, Rolex. __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

28 March 2014, 12:09 AM	#21
Mystro 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,244	Gonna be the run away hit of the year. __________________

28 March 2014, 12:10 AM	#22
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	That dial is pretty hot. __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

28 March 2014, 12:19 AM	#23
tomchicago Banned Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Chicago Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270. Posts: 2,717	i have never been a fan of any of the SD, DSSD (yet I always respected the models), but THAT WATCH IS GORGEOUS!

28 March 2014, 12:43 AM	#24
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,357	I don't think a matte and often grey looking dial matches with a shiny ceramic bezel, matte bezel would be better. Also it looks a little too thick for a 40mm watch in my eyes, 42mm would have been better, and I don't need the extra WR. Subc is still my preference.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)