The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

View Poll Results: Wg Pepsi or 5164a
WG Pepsi 96 43.05%
5164a 127 56.95%
Voters: 223. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 August 2014, 07:14 PM   #1
kuota_kalibur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
WG Pepsi or 5164a for travel?

If you can have one travel time/ gmt watch which one will you get?
They're about the same price.
My issue with 5164a is I live in a tropical country. When
I travel to other colder countries, the 5164a becomes loose.
Rolex solved this with their easy link bracelet.
I love the slealthiness of my 5164a but I also like wearing my watches tight. Don't like it dangling like a bracelet. If I cut one more rubber, it'll be too tight where I live.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
kuota_kalibur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:04 PM   #2
Soly20
2024 Pledge Member
 
Soly20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
I think you're mind is already set onto the WG Pepsi. It's gorgeous. Go for it.
Soly20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:08 PM   #3
kuota_kalibur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
No set on wg Pepsi

Thanks for the reply!

Anyone had the same experience with the rubber strap of their 5167/5164?
kuota_kalibur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:14 PM   #4
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,952
I find my 5167R to be the most comfortable watch I have ever owned. The tropical strap was only watch I ever could have worn when I went to Arizona in June to the Grand Canyon and Sedona. Any bracelet watch would have driven me crazy! The tropical strap so comfy it is hard to take off!! For me the perfect weekend watch and daily wearer if I didn't own so many other watches. I would pick it all day long over a metal bracelet especially living in a tropical area....No question about it!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:32 PM   #5
kuota_kalibur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
Thanks Ken!

I really like my 5164a complication wise, stealthiness, lightness vs the WG pepsi. I guess I have to find the perfect fit of the rubber strap on my wrist without digging in the clasp on my wrist. Might try cutting one more ridge.
kuota_kalibur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:35 PM   #6
stockjock1975
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,569
I vote for the 5164. But then again, I am a little biased.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1408880130.383126.jpg
stockjock1975 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:36 PM   #7
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuota_kalibur View Post
I really like my 5164a complication wise, stealthiness, lightness vs the WG pepsi. I guess I have to find the perfect fit of the rubber strap on my wrist without digging in the clasp on my wrist. Might try cutting one more ridge.
It is one watch that wears so comfy a bit loose and when outside in heat wrist expands so perfect fit! I have no problem with it like that given how light and thin the watch is!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 09:57 PM   #8
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,367
Very tough choice, like both watches. If you have other Pateks then I would go for the luxury of a gold bracelet, but if not then the 5164.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:01 PM   #9
kuota_kalibur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
Pics of 5164a

Just right in warm Maui, Hawaii.

And second pic doesn't look loose but it's looser in colder New Zealand.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg photo-16 copy.jpg (97.1 KB, 1215 views)
File Type: jpg photo-16 copy 2.jpg (69.5 KB, 1211 views)
kuota_kalibur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:06 PM   #10
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,706
I don't like PCL's on a sport watch, so Rubber or bracelet without polish links would be my choice. Don't care if it actually have the GMT function at all. I go for Comfort. Actually for traveling I would recommend cheaper options (depends where are you going ) but I would say: 5167A, Sub or AP diver.

Cheers !
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:13 PM   #11
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuota_kalibur View Post
Just right in warm Maui, Hawaii.

And second pic doesn't look loose but it's looser in colder New Zealand.
You need to have that strap properly fitted...It is way too loose!!!

Here is mine for comparison...Perfect fit!

__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:13 PM   #12
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
5990 w/ 1.5 bracelet link.

And unless you just really love the WG, for travel I'd buy a SS GMTIIc and be done with it.

It's strange that the rubber is that different in various climates for you.

The picture of your watch looks VERY loose in both shots.

Good luck with whatever you decide. All good travel watches, just WG will be very heavy.
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:15 PM   #13
incontrol
"TRF" Member
 
incontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
I am biased as well, but just wore my 5164 and it is the most comfortable watch I own, by a large margin. I can not imagine the weight of the white gold GMT being more comfortable as a daily wearer. My 5164 is a lifer for me (unless PP comes up with something even better!)
__________________
Patek Philippe
Rolex
incontrol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:31 PM   #14
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by texex91 View Post
5990 w/ 1.5 bracelet link.

And unless you just really love the WG, for travel I'd buy a SS GMTIIc and be done with it.

It's strange that the rubber is that different in various climates for you.

The picture of your watch looks VERY loose in both shots.

Good luck with whatever you decide. All good travel watches, just WG will be very heavy.
Even with 1.5 link my 5711 1A awful on hot climate days!! Love the Nautilus bracelet but if I had to wear it in tropical climate I wouldn't own it!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 10:40 PM   #15
travisb
2024 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,326
5164! Too comfortable and classy to pass up.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 11:23 PM   #16
Jabberjaw
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
I find my 5167R to be the most comfortable watch I have ever owned. The tropical strap was only watch I ever could have worn when I went to Arizona in June to the Grand Canyon and Sedona. Any bracelet watch would have driven me crazy! The tropical strap so comfy it is hard to take off!! For me the perfect weekend watch and daily wearer if I didn't own so many other watches. I would pick it all day long over a metal bracelet especially living in a tropical area....No question about it!
You just saved me more $$.
Jabberjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2014, 11:42 PM   #17
myopiccoog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 948
Hamm! The 5164 travel time complication blows the Rolex GMT complication away. However, the Pepsi GMT is classic and would trust it in water more. Challenge, given the Pepsi GMT is WG the watch will depreciate quickly after the market is saturated. The 5164 has held up pretty well in resale.
myopiccoog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 12:20 AM   #18
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,706
I know this is completely off topic, but how many times when you are interacting on a thread you come up with an unrelated idea. All of then sudden you say "it fits" ( just like House DMD). Well in this case, I was able to come up with a conclusion that fits my understanding of a "Real Sport Watch" (of course your definition might vary from mine but I'll still share it here. To me a Real Sport Watch is a watch you feel comfortable Swiming, Snorkling, Fishing, Camping, Hiking etc,
To me the key words there is Feel comfortable. Some of you noticed that I been trying to force a 4th watch, and wonder why I am doing that? I really believe that I cover all angles. But now I Know what it is, I don't own a Real Sport watch from the holy trinity (I can discard VC, because I am not interested in VC). Recently I narrow it down to 5167A and AP diver, but I feel today that the AP diver fits better for my collection, if I ever buy it.
I would say this if Ever run in economics problems, and I just can afford one watch, I would sell my 3 watches and buy the 5167R. In my current collection, it doesn't make sense to add another Gold Patek sport watch.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 12:20 AM   #19
GB-man
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabberjaw View Post
You just saved me more $$.
But how much has he potentially cost you already
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 12:29 AM   #20
goog53
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,074
Not to go too off topic, but have you considered the AP Ceramic Diver? That to me seems like a kickass sports watch. My only complaint would be that it can wear quite big depending on wrist size.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JorgeCCW View Post
I know this is completely off topic, but how many times when you are interacting on a thread you come up with an unrelated idea. All of then sudden you say "it fits" ( just like House DMD). Well in this case, I was able to come up with a conclusion that fits my understanding of a "Real Sport Watch" (of course your definition might vary from mine but I'll still share it here. To me a Real Sport Watch is a watch you feel comfortable Swiming, Snorkling, Fishing, Camping, Hiking etc,
To me the key words there is Feel comfortable. Some of you noticed that I been trying to force a 4th watch, and wonder why I am doing that? I really believe that I cover all angles. But now I Know what it is, I don't own a Real Sport watch from the holy trinity (I can discard VC, because I am not interested in VC). Recently I narrow it down to 5167A and AP diver, but I feel today that the AP diver fits better for my collection, if I ever buy it.
I would say this if Ever run in economics problems, and I just can afford one watch, I would sell my 3 watches and buy the 5167R. In my current collection, it doesn't make sense to add another Gold Patek sport watch.
goog53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 12:44 AM   #21
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by goog53 View Post
Not to go too off topic, but have you considered the AP Ceramic Diver? That to me seems like a kickass sports watch. My only complaint would be that it can wear quite big depending on wrist size.
It's a nice looking watch, I might be wrong but I had the idea that it's about the same size as the standard Diver. But for some reason the fact that is all black, it gives me the impression of a fashion watch more than a Sport watch. Maybe I just need to warm up more to the idea.

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 01:04 AM   #22
2muchtimeonmyhands
"TRF" Member
 
2muchtimeonmyhands's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: Bermuda
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 121
The humidity here is insane and can get cold in winter. Between that and AC, the easy-link is almost essential for me. ARolex that hangs loose can become very 'gangsta' very quickly! Out of both options I don't find either particularly 'pretty' watches but my preference would be the WG Pepsi, it's just a damn cool watch. If it was up against the 5167r, that would be a tougher choice
2muchtimeonmyhands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 01:32 AM   #23
Jabberjaw
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
Since I don't travel, the 5164 isn't the watch for me, but as a all purpose watch, the 5167A is as good as it gets. The 5167R is interesting, but on me would look like I am a pimp... which I am not.
Jabberjaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 01:40 AM   #24
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabberjaw View Post
Since I don't travel, the 5164 isn't the watch for me, but as a all purpose watch, the 5167A is as good as it gets. The 5167R is interesting, but on me would look like I am a pimp... which I am not.
Would look anything but like a pimp. Extremely understated and the warmth of RG case with brushed bezel unparalleled IMHO. You aren't talking about a blingy all gold bracelet nor anything closely like it.

__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 02:30 AM   #25
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,873
I am quite neutral on the 5167 SS and think it's a nice classy sporty PP. I really like the 5167R for how the dial and the RG case pops ( won't mind eventually owning one! ). But I can't warm up to the 5164 traveltime. The problem? Those ears on the right. They look like a pair of jaws.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 02:37 AM   #26
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
Would look anything but like a pimp. Extremely understated and the warmth of RG case with brushed bezel unparalleled IMHO. You aren't talking about a blingy all gold bracelet nor anything closely like it.

Never heard pimping and Patek in the same sentence
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 03:12 AM   #27
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,938
I'm faced with this exact same conundrum... Sort of. I know, I'll get both eventually but which should come first?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 04:15 AM   #28
GB-man
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I'm faced with this exact same conundrum... Sort of. I know, I'll get both eventually but which should come first?

Easy the patek as you can get a discount, even if nominal.

I assume the blro will take a year or so to settle down, like most rolex. Why get hit for no reason?

Unless patek drops a 5164r on you. The so help you god
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 04:22 AM   #29
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,442
PEPSI.
It is the Bar for all travel watches.

that said, i have the 5167 and find that the strap is very forgiving if it is a bit loose because it holds tension and its shape with a bit of built in elasticity.

i travel with my SS explorer II polar but the aquanaut is a great alternative as it is even more under the radar.



im no help :)
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2014, 04:40 AM   #30
kilyung
2024 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Easy the patek as you can get a discount, even if nominal.

I assume the blro will take a year or so to settle down, like most rolex. Why get hit for no reason?

Unless patek drops a 5164r on you. The so help you god
Yeah you may be right... God help me if a 5164r is released!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.