![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 301
|
TT Seamaster 300? Opinions?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
|
Looks amazing
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,458
|
I think I would prefer all gold or all stainless. But still a sharp watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Winder, Georgia
Posts: 320
|
If I were doing two tone, I would go for the full bracelet myself. And keep in mind that the two tone 300MCs have very, very little resale value. That may or may not factor into your buying decision, but it's something I at least like to consider in case I tire of the watch. That being said I have the all SS version and love it. Which is good, because it's resale value right now is less than half of the new price of the watch. Lol. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Charles
Location: New York, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 20
|
Gold would look better. But this watch is stunning.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.