|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
8 November 2016, 01:05 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
(Original?) Vintage Date 1601 WITHOUT "Superlative" on "Officially Cert. Chrono."?
Hey guys,
It's been a while since I've been on here... I recently bought a nice vintage Rolex but I've never seen a Rolex (caseback dates to Q1 1960) without "Superlative" in the two lines "(Superlative) Officially Certified Chronometer". Was this intended or was it repainted for whatever reason? I know sometimes small things matter (e.g. "underline dials") and was wondering what this exactly meant... if anything? Calibre 1560... Butterfly roter. Pics attached; I don't have the MPN but assuming 15xx or 6xxx. Thanks!! |
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 03:12 PM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: janice
Location: St.Petersburg Fl
Watch: all of them!
Posts: 673
|
hi whether it's repainted or not it's the earlier version "OCC" type dial. later versions have the newer style text.
|
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 03:50 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
well, apparently it's never been repainted (according to the first owner). I just never have seen it written out like this...
|
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 04:15 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sofia
Watch: Corum Admirals Cup
Posts: 332
|
Rolex 1601 should say Datejust, not Date on the dial.
|
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 05:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
I actually never said Datejust 1601... I said OP Date 15xx; And in reference to the 1st reply, what's the "earlier version OCC dial"?
I know, right? This has to be an earlier Date 6xxx... but my Dad has it right now and I don't have the reference number at hand yet... I can confirm it's never been repainted or redone. So a bit puzzled... |
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 06:09 PM
|
#6 | |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,769
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 06:35 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
Whoops my bad. There's no date 34mm 1601. I don't think this is a 15xx either. But does anybody have an actual answer?
|
|
|
|
|
8 November 2016, 07:52 PM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,214
|
Looking at the hands and markers it is an early version
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
|
|
|
|
9 November 2016, 05:40 PM
|
#9 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 16223 DJ
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| dial , superlative , two line , vintage |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
