The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 September 2008, 06:42 AM   #1
rkboyer911
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Roy
Location: Kansas City Mo
Watch: Sea Dweller "M"
Posts: 181
Does this make since to anyone? Commercial divers please help....

This went way beyond me.......I was on another fourm and was chatting about my new purchase and this guy wrote this......

Rolexes don't keep good time in Roatan. Something about magnetic fields or something like that.
You may exceed your max bottom time and have to take a chamber ride.
answer was this...........

ONLY mechanical movement watches will be affected by magnetic fields.

If you apply a a magnetic field to a Rolex while diving, it could have a significant error on measuring bottom time. You see, as you dive deeper, the greater gaussian effect of the earth's core will exert a much stronger force on the watch movement. Remember the right hand rule. It should be obvious here. Not only that but I would posit that the diver may potentially experience a shock due to the increasing electric field generated by the two magnetic poles, (your primary and your octo would turn into opposing dipoles), combined with the proximity to the earth's core. Two opposing dipoles are depth are deadly. (Faraday's corollary). My advice is to use a Casio. It could save your life.

Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of diving with a Rolex.

WOW he totally lost me any of you Commercial divers know anything about this?????
rkboyer911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:02 AM   #2
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkboyer911 View Post
If you apply a a magnetic field to a Rolex while diving, it could have a significant error on measuring bottom time. You see, as you dive deeper, the greater gaussian effect of the earth's core will exert a much stronger force on the watch movement. Remember the right hand rule. It should be obvious here. Not only that but I would posit that the diver may potentially experience a shock due to the increasing electric field generated by the two magnetic poles, (your primary and your octo would turn into opposing dipoles), combined with the proximity to the earth's core. Two opposing dipoles are depth are deadly. (Faraday's corollary). My advice is to use a Casio. It could save your life.

Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of diving with a Rolex.

Cough... Bulllll shhhhhtttt... Cough... Cough...




If I were welding I would probably use something other than a Rolex when diving...

But I don't use a SuperLite or a Kirby when welding either...

Not because of the magnetic field but because welding can strip metals from the surrounding area... Don't really know how the 904L would stand up, just would rather not try it...
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:10 AM   #3
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,736
Sounds like bull dookey to me BUT
regardless every diver I know uses a computer
these days anyway so VERY few divers would really
count on their watch for their air supply time.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:10 AM   #4
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Not a clue. You could try a PM to vjb.knife. Vince is a former commercial diver.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:23 AM   #5
Tareg
"TRF" Member
 
Tareg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: LNDN/Turks&Caicos
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 212
doesn't sound likely to me, earths magnetic field does change with distance from the core, but if going from sea level to the top of a mountain at 1000s of feet has no effect on your watch, then I doubt the increased magnetic strength at a couple of 100 ft below sea level will have any effect.
Tareg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:34 AM   #6
Perdu
"TRF" Member
 
Perdu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
That's why Seiko sell so many mechanicals to divers.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500

Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter
Perdu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:37 AM   #7
rkboyer911
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Roy
Location: Kansas City Mo
Watch: Sea Dweller "M"
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
Sounds like bull dookey to me BUT
regardless every diver I know uses a computer
these days anyway so VERY few divers would really
count on their watch for their air supply time.
I do infact use a computer (to much thinking not to use one)
I just found this interesting and had never heard of it...and ive been diving for several years. All most every dive watch ive seen is mechanical.
rkboyer911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 07:58 AM   #8
Markg
"TRF" Member
 
Markg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: California
Watch: R
Posts: 913
thats the stupidest thing i have heard in a long time...

when diving, i dont wear my sub, but rather two computers. but it has NOTHING to do with what he told you.....
Markg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:11 AM   #9
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markg View Post
thats the stupidest thing i have heard in a long time...

when diving, i dont wear my sub, but rather two computers. but it has NOTHING to do with what he told you.....
I use two computers as well...

When the first computer requires decompression I hang it at 10 feet while I dive using the second computer, by the time it needs to decompress, I can usually re use the first...

By alternating computers all day I can usually double my bottom time
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:16 AM   #10
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Sounds like bull
The distance to the earth's core is so much bigger than the depth any commercial diver can go and makes no real effect on the watch.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:27 AM   #11
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,346
I think that that is very well written.... Very well written indeed.....

...........

If it were true, of course, all of us who did our diving in the 60's and 70's (and before) would be dead now..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:46 AM   #12
rkboyer911
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Roy
Location: Kansas City Mo
Watch: Sea Dweller "M"
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I think that that is very well written.... Very well written indeed.....

...........

If it were true, of course, all of us who did our diving in the 60's and 70's (and before) would be dead now..


Never seen that meter before Thats great!!
rkboyer911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:48 AM   #13
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Like that BS Meter
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 08:58 AM   #14
VDENTALS
"TRF" Member
 
VDENTALS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: TEXAS
Watch: ROLEX LV
Posts: 156
People that used a rolex don't care about time
__________________
GMT MASTER IIC 116710 M
GMT MASTER ll 16710 M
SUBMARINER 16610 LV M
SUBMARINER 16613 M
VDENTALS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 10:02 AM   #15
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEaton View Post
I use two computers as well...

When the first computer requires decompression I hang it at 10 feet while I dive using the second computer, by the time it needs to decompress, I can usually re use the first...

By alternating computers all day I can usually double my bottom time
Nice.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 10:13 AM   #16
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkboyer911 View Post
This went way beyond me.......I was on another fourm and was chatting about my new purchase and this guy wrote this......

Rolexes don't keep good time in Roatan. Something about magnetic fields or something like that.
You may exceed your max bottom time and have to take a chamber ride.
answer was this...........

ONLY mechanical movement watches will be affected by magnetic fields.

If you apply a a magnetic field to a Rolex while diving, it could have a significant error on measuring bottom time. You see, as you dive deeper, the greater gaussian effect of the earth's core will exert a much stronger force on the watch movement. Remember the right hand rule. It should be obvious here. Not only that but I would posit that the diver may potentially experience a shock due to the increasing electric field generated by the two magnetic poles, (your primary and your octo would turn into opposing dipoles), combined with the proximity to the earth's core. Two opposing dipoles are depth are deadly. (Faraday's corollary). My advice is to use a Casio. It could save your life.

Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of diving with a Rolex.

WOW he totally lost me any of you Commercial divers know anything about this?????
He was kidding.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 10:23 AM   #17
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
He was kidding.
I'm serious Ed...

My bones are 904L and I fart nitrogen...
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 10:43 AM   #18
rkboyer911
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Roy
Location: Kansas City Mo
Watch: Sea Dweller "M"
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEaton View Post
I'm serious Ed...

My bones are 904L and I fart nitrogen...
YUP and if you did that you would be farting nitrogen!!
rkboyer911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 12:02 PM   #19
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
You surely don't need a Commercial Diver ........

You surely don't need a Commercial Diver to answer this question you need a geo-physicist. If you ask me though that was pretty high on the BS meter. I was told by a couple of guys not to wear a Mechanical watch while underwater welding because it could either magnetize it or otherwise affect it. So I never wore a watch while welding or burning, but rarely wore one while commercial diving anyway. I never used a computer either, I had a Tender for that.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 12:51 PM   #20
Brushpup
"TRF" Member
 
Brushpup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by vjb.knife View Post
You surely don't need a Commercial Diver to answer this question you need a geo-physicist. If you ask me though that was pretty high on the BS meter. I was told by a couple of guys not to wear a Mechanical watch while underwater welding because it could either magnetize it or otherwise affect it. So I never wore a watch while welding or burning, but rarely wore one while commercial diving anyway. I never used a computer either, I had a Tender for that.
Hey Vince, your post makes me wonder, and I am asking sincerely, not in an argumentative way. If watches could/would get magnetized while welding why would a company like COMEX require them as part of standard gear? Really curious about this now..

Patrick
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member


PClub # 10
74,592
The safest place for your watch is on your wrist.
Brushpup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 01:14 PM   #21
Parachrom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 721
My BS sniffer is going off. Never had a watch get magnetized under water except once, as I neared a loadstone No not a BS loadstone but the real deal type of loadstone. It went a bit screwy on time, but a trip to my Ad set it right. But being in proximity of a 2 ft diameter loadstone would magentize just about anything.
Parachrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 01:16 PM   #22
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
In any commercial diving that I did a watch was ........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brushpup View Post
Hey Vince, your post makes me wonder, and I am asking sincerely, not in an argumentative way. If watches could/would get magnetized while welding why would a company like COMEX require them as part of standard gear? Really curious about this now..

Patrick
In any commercial diving that I did a watch was not required by any of the companies that I worked for. I wore a watch occasionally but rarely. I dove band masks and helmets that always had communications with the surface. The Tenders and/or Diving Superintendent always kept times and logs. I was told by several Instructors in Diving School and guys that I worked with that welding could hurt a watch so why bother risking it if you don't need it. Comex can do what ever they want, I never worked for them so I do not know their policies. How sure are you that Comex "requires" that Divers wear a watch during welding and burning operations? It's possible but I am not so sure that Comex requires this, but I can say that a watch is most certainly not necessary for this type of work. I don't find it curious though; many companies in the same industry have very different policies, practices SOP's.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 01:45 PM   #23
RsqVet
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
As others have mentioned the argument about the earth's magnetic field is pure BS.

As to welding with a watch, unless there is something massively diffirent about underwater welding, then there is not likely much to worry about either, unless you coil the lead around your watch and strike the arc.

Also 904L, being similar to 316L is MOST likely not able to be magnatized to any significant degree. Many, many orthopedic implants are made from 316L and these are routinely MRI'd with no issue.
RsqVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 01:59 AM   #24
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by RsqVet View Post
As others have mentioned the argument about the earth's magnetic field is pure BS.

As to welding with a watch, unless there is something massively diffirent about underwater welding, then there is not likely much to worry about either, unless you coil the lead around your watch and strike the arc.

Also 904L, being similar to 316L is MOST likely not able to be magnatized to any significant degree. Many, many orthopedic implants are made from 316L and these are routinely MRI'd with no issue.
There are quite a few things that are different about welding underwater in the ocean. For one you must wear rubber gloves under leather welding gloves. If you don't you will get shocked unlike on dry land. Quite obviously seawater is a good conductor of electricity. If your rubber gloves are not in good condition and you are holding onto the grounded work with your free hand (which in many cases is required to maintain position) and the welding lead is hot, the current will run from the ground up your arm and across to the the hand with the lead in it and I can tell you, from personal experience, that it is invigorating to say the least. In fact even if there is a very small hole in that rubber glove you will be shocked.

I do not know exactly how to explain how this might affect a watch in this case and I am not sure whether these guys were talking about the watch getting magnetized or actually damaged in some other way. What I do know is that I heard it from a couple of people that were very reliable, very experienced and they were not fooling around about it. So, as I said before if you don't need to wear a watch in a situation where there is a fair potential to damage it why wear it at all. At that time I had only one diving watch and used it more for sport diving and every day use than on the job, so I was not willing to risk damage of it. If you are not concerned about it then I suggest the next time that you are welding underwater to wear your Rolex and poke a few holes in you gloves just for good effect; then let us all know how your watch is running. If it is fine than I will concede that I am probably mistaken.

That being said I have quite a few diving watches now and wear a Rolex Sub or Sinn EZM3 daily as a beater now regardless of my activities. I am retired now but even when I weld at home I don't wear a watch other than a G-shock perhaps. I think you will find in general that Commercial Divers are a rather frugal and over protective bunch when it comes to protecting themselves, their crew and their gear so in my opinion you will not find a lot of them wearing Rolexes and similar on the job at all much less welding or burning underwater.

By the way, from what I understand, the 904L case is not what you need to be worried about magnetizing it is the bits and pieces inside the movement which are not made of austenitic stainless steel like the mainspring.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 02:07 AM   #25
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,346
Welding will destroy a watch...

It isn't the magnetic flux, but the actual molten spatter that will punch right through the crystal, stick to the metal, melt the gold.

Unless it's well protected ... fine... but then, what's the point of a wrist watch if it's completely shielded...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 02:21 AM   #26
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
I've not noticed splatter so much with underwater welding, but I know that the electrolytic fields set up in saltwater will strip metal right off your hat, sometimes to the point that regulators are like tin foil and can collapse...

I'm not aware of electrolytic effects upon 904L and cannot state pro or con...
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 03:14 AM   #27
rkboyer911
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Roy
Location: Kansas City Mo
Watch: Sea Dweller "M"
Posts: 181
Boy the saga goes on he just wont let in lie..... now hes saying "I once saw a diver's regs arc together because of the effect of the Coriolis force. The spinning of the earth produced enormous potential energy differences between the opposing metals in the regs. You see at sufficient depth, the Curie point temperature at which the orientations of spins within iron become randomized,causes the substance to lose its magnetic field. The loss of said field can induce huge temperature swings. Close to one pole of a magnet, field strength diminishes proportionally to the inverse square of the distance. This is because it behaves as a "unipolar magnetic field" (that is, the close pole seems much stronger than the far pole, so the far pole can be ignored). Gravity is also a unipolar field, and it also diminishes as the inverse square of distance; but, unlike magnetic fields, gravitational fields always obey the inverse squared law. The increased gravitational field can lower your bouyancy characteristic especially if wearing ballast like the sea-dweller. In short, you should have an emergency release strap attached to the watch that will allow you to dump the Rolex in extreme magnetic conditions."

(I'll be underneath carrying my emergency Rolex body bag).
rkboyer911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 03:17 AM   #28
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Where are you reading this???

I'm impressed with the amount of BS he can sling...
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 03:19 AM   #29
mpkRolex
2024 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston USA
Watch: Pepsi & Starbucks
Posts: 1,880
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkboyer911 View Post
This went way beyond me.......I was on another fourm and was chatting about my new purchase and this guy wrote this......

Rolexes don't keep good time in Roatan. Something about magnetic fields or something like that.
You may exceed your max bottom time and have to take a chamber ride.
answer was this...........

ONLY mechanical movement watches will be affected by magnetic fields.

If you apply a a magnetic field to a Rolex while diving, it could have a significant error on measuring bottom time. You see, as you dive deeper, the greater gaussian effect of the earth's core will exert a much stronger force on the watch movement. Remember the right hand rule. It should be obvious here. Not only that but I would posit that the diver may potentially experience a shock due to the increasing electric field generated by the two magnetic poles, (your primary and your octo would turn into opposing dipoles), combined with the proximity to the earth's core. Two opposing dipoles are depth are deadly. (Faraday's corollary). My advice is to use a Casio. It could save your life.

Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of diving with a Rolex.

WOW he totally lost me any of you Commercial divers know anything about this?????

A Submariner or SD can go up to 400 meters deep. Do you think 400mts would make any difference in magnetic field considering the size of earth? (The diameter of the earth at the equator is 7,926.41 miles (12,756.32 kilometers)) I think it is bull****
__________________
Rest in peace JJ!
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani

"Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly"
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 05:17 AM   #30
1MAC
"TRF" Member
 
1MAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Leawood, Kansas
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 854
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpkRolex View Post
A Submariner or SD can go up to 400 meters deep. Do you think 400mts would make any difference in magnetic field considering the size of earth? (The diameter of the earth at the equator is 7,926.41 miles (12,756.32 kilometers)) I think it is bull****
No, it can't. If I remember correctly, magnetic fields decrease with the square of the radius just like gravity. If the radius of the earth is about 4000 miles and you dove one mile (that'd be impressive) you would change your radius by 1/40th of one percent. Not a huge difference in radius or magnetic field.
__________________
Time wounds all heels.


1MAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.