The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 November 2008, 01:02 PM   #1
RolexDaytona91
"TRF" Member
 
RolexDaytona91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Sault Ste. Marie
Posts: 61
904l?

Just checking to see if EVERY SS rolex is made from 904L steel, since im in the market for my first rolex it will be relatively cheap (by rolex standards!) but I still want to make sure im getting a high quality steel and not something like 440A.

Thanks,

~Andrew
RolexDaytona91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2008, 02:01 PM   #2
dcash0615
2024 Pledge Member
 
dcash0615's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,391
To my knowledge all SS models that Rolex makes currently are made with 904L steel.
dcash0615 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2008, 02:57 PM   #3
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
only the oyster case.
I thought the case back and the bracelet was of different grade of SS so it's less likely to cause skin reaction to the chromium content of 904L
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 November 2008, 11:33 PM   #4
jnewell
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bahston
Posts: 127
"Vintage" watches were not 904L...but I don't think anyone thinks they're "relatively cheap" or not "high quality"
__________________
1680 Submariner ~ 5513 Submariner ~ 16710 GMT Master II ~ 145.00.22 Speedmaster Professional ~ 2531.80 Seamaster Professional ~ Marathon TSAR
jnewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 03:04 AM   #5
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-Sub View Post
only the oyster case.
I thought the case back and the bracelet was of different grade of SS so it's less likely to cause skin reaction to the chromium content of 904L
The entire watch is 904L steel to the best of my knowledge.....the bracelet as well!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 04:31 AM   #6
Armand
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Hermann
Location: Middle of Europe
Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B
Posts: 413
Since when are Rolexes made of 904L?

thx, Hermann
Armand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 05:30 AM   #7
Incurable
"TRF" Member
 
Incurable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
I thought I read (here) that the bracelets are 316??? Wouldn't hurt to clear up any dis-information on this. To the OP, there are a number (some heated) discussions about the virtues of 904L vs 316... Try a little searching
__________________

Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk)
Rolex Explorer 114270
Sinn 356 Sa Flieger
Limes Endurance 1Tausend
Too many others...
#2592

It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy...
Incurable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 05:41 AM   #8
wuzzzer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 384
The newest Rolexes are all 904L. As the SS models have been redesigned over the past few years they are now 904L bracelet and case instead of 904L case only as they previously were made.
wuzzzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 04:14 PM   #9
SS Oyster
2024 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,034
904L is far superior because it doesn't react to chemicals in the body or in saltwater. This keeps the case and bracelet looking like new for the next 50 years. Some earlier models were not of 904L and when you look at them opened, you see some corrosion right where the case back meets the case, compromising the waterproof integrity of the watch.
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 04:37 PM   #10
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Better than I thought!
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 05:36 PM   #11
scottschoe
"TRF" Member
 
scottschoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexDaytona91 View Post
Just checking to see if EVERY SS rolex is made from 904L steel, since im in the market for my first rolex it will be relatively cheap (by rolex standards!) but I still want to make sure im getting a high quality steel and not something like 440A.

Thanks,

~Andrew
'High quality steel' is all marketing hype. I've read that a member actually analyzed the steel in his modern Rolex and found that it was a mix of 904 and 316.
__________________
__________________
scottschoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 November 2008, 08:31 PM   #12
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottschoe View Post
'High quality steel' is all marketing hype. I've read that a member actually analyzed the steel in his modern Rolex and found that it was a mix of 904 and 316.
Would 100% agree with you there is nothing magical about 904L fact in many many ways 316L is better.Fact the majority of the Swiss Japanese watch manufactures and many high end brands brands use the normal 316L if there was any advantage in using 904L don't you think they would all be using it.The only main fact is that it cost more than the 316L a pure marketing ploy And many industries use 904L in Processing plant for sulphuric, phosphoric and acetic acids Pulp and paper processing,Components in gas scrubbing plants,Seawater cooling equipment,Oil refinery components,plus many others.

From article on net
Quote from Rolex employee in 2002.
At the moment, we have several companies all over the world, serving our needs for stainless steel. The watch case backs and bracelets are all made of X2CrNiMo17-12-2 S.Steel which by the way is the code for 316L and is the best compromise between the attributes of the variant materials. As usual, the steel is melted under vacuum, so we get an very pure base, which is easy to handle and allows almost perfect polishing. I think, the same procedure as in every good gold smelting company.Well as we all know 904L has a quite high nickel content, and nickel can be quite irritant to skin.And as far as I am aware only certain parts of Rolex are 904L the rest according to a Rolex employee the more common 316L.But would doubt if Rolex would say that because 904L,is approx 3 times more expensive than the more common 316L.And we all know more expensive or bigger,deeper rated etc is always better don't we.Just like it takes 12 months to make a Rolex.Or Carlsberg is the finest lager in the world properly all just b#llsh#t pure hype and marketing words
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 November 2008, 03:48 AM   #13
CVerKuilen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: MI
Watch: Tudor Chrono
Posts: 75
Where do you guys come up with this conspiracy theory stuff? From what I know just about all watches 10 years old and newer are 100% 904L. For you guys that are skeptical, take your newest purchase to a friend with a mass spectrometer, and stop going on hearsay!
CVerKuilen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 November 2008, 04:00 AM   #14
Armand
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Hermann
Location: Middle of Europe
Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B
Posts: 413
Icon14

Quote:
Originally Posted by CVerKuilen View Post
Where do you guys come up with this conspiracy theory stuff? From what I know just about all watches 10 years old and newer are 100% 904L. For you guys that are skeptical, take your newest purchase to a friend with a mass spectrometer, and stop going on hearsay!
From where do you know that?

Can you quote a source?

Mine is from 2002 ( bought, may have been made in 2001, a GMT II ) and I would like it to be 904L!

Just so itīs a "special" steel, 316 is tooooo common!

;-)

Hermann
Armand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 November 2008, 05:49 AM   #15
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
They are supposed to be 904L, so why would Rolex choose otherwise?
Someone somewhere will have tested a watch and if it had not been 904L then the cat would be well and truly out of the bag by know.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best.
f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 09:09 AM   #16
kriesch
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Wales, UK
Watch: SD
Posts: 52
As far as I know the case is manufactured from 904L and bracelets 316L.
Check it out...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=az_P_N...eature=related
kriesch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 01:55 PM   #17
wuzzzer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 384
Did anyone not read my comment above? You can take it to the bank.
wuzzzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 03:46 PM   #18
Incurable
"TRF" Member
 
Incurable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuzzzer View Post
The newest Rolexes are all 904L. As the SS models have been redesigned over the past few years they are now 904L bracelet and case instead of 904L case only as they previously were made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuzzzer View Post
Did anyone not read my comment above? You can take it to the bank.
I did... I guess I have to ask, define "newest"??
__________________

Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk)
Rolex Explorer 114270
Sinn 356 Sa Flieger
Limes Endurance 1Tausend
Too many others...
#2592

It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy...
Incurable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 04:18 PM   #19
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesch View Post
As far as I know the case is manufactured from 904L and bracelets 316L.
Check it out...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=az_P_N...eature=related
Nowhere in that video does it say that the bracelets are NOT made of 904L steel. The video only talks about the cases.

To the best of my knowledge, the entire watch is made of 904L steel.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 04:32 PM   #20
Incurable
"TRF" Member
 
Incurable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
Can folks please cite their references?
__________________

Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk)
Rolex Explorer 114270
Sinn 356 Sa Flieger
Limes Endurance 1Tausend
Too many others...
#2592

It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy...
Incurable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 04:48 PM   #21
RsqVet
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
Folks.... much ado about NOTHING; every watch and every part of every watch we are discussing here (except the SD) is also made out 18k gold.

Gold is weaker, it scratches easier, it dents easier, it wears easier. So for the love of god, if 18k will do surely whatever stainless will do as well.

I too agree that 904 over 316 is 90% marketing hype and BS, if we start seeing the same wear / corroshion / pitting at the O-ring interface on cases in 15-20 years that we see on the old subs then I will say 904 is 100% BS, as this is the only advantage that I see.
RsqVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 08:59 PM   #22
Armand
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Hermann
Location: Middle of Europe
Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B
Posts: 413
Icon2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incurable View Post
I did... I guess I have to ask, define "newest"??
Thas EXACTLY what I wanted to know!

Since >> WHEN <<, either case, or total watch?

Hermann
Armand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 09:13 PM   #23
unclesallie
2024 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,916
panties in a bunch over THIS?
c'mon guys, relax.
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 November 2008, 10:53 PM   #24
jnewell
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bahston
Posts: 127
With all these interesting revalations about the superiority of 904L, I will be looking for the price of vintage watches to crash!
__________________
1680 Submariner ~ 5513 Submariner ~ 16710 GMT Master II ~ 145.00.22 Speedmaster Professional ~ 2531.80 Seamaster Professional ~ Marathon TSAR
jnewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 01:16 AM   #25
entropydave
"TRF" Member
 
entropydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
Quote:
Originally Posted by CVerKuilen View Post
Where do you guys come up with this conspiracy theory stuff? From what I know just about all watches 10 years old and newer are 100% 904L. For you guys that are skeptical, take your newest purchase to a friend with a mass spectrometer, and stop going on hearsay!
entropydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 01:37 AM   #26
wuzzzer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 384
All the newest SS models with polished center links have 904L bracelets along with the new Air-King that still has the brushed bracelet.
Source: A Rolex rep.
wuzzzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 02:45 AM   #27
Jimbits76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
To me....

Steel is steel is steel.

As long as it keeps the water out and can be regularly polished I don't care what kind of steel it is made from!

J
Jimbits76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 02:49 AM   #28
Armand
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Hermann
Location: Middle of Europe
Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B
Posts: 413
Icon14

Itīs just the usual interest in all Rolex related issues.

Otherwise we probably wouldnīt be there at this forum.

As an engeneer I find it interesting, that there is a steel, wich contains nearly 50% alloys! Half of that "steel" is Chrome and Nickel!

I always thought the aim was to "better" the steel with as few %s of alloy metals as possible, as these are expensive.

If 904L polishes better and is more corrosion resistant against sweat and seawater or chlorinated water, itīs very - ok with me!

Hermann
Armand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 05:30 AM   #29
Incurable
"TRF" Member
 
Incurable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Pat
Location: PNW
Watch: your P's and Q's
Posts: 2,549
For the record, I don't view this as an obsessive and useless query. I view it more as fact finding. The only problem is, the facts are hard to substantiate w/Rolex being so tight lipped. Hearsay and opinions are plentiful, facts not so much...
__________________

Rolex GMT Master II 16710 (Blk/Blk)
Rolex Explorer 114270
Sinn 356 Sa Flieger
Limes Endurance 1Tausend
Too many others...
#2592

It may seem like I'm doing nothing but, at a cellular level, I'm actually quite busy...
Incurable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 November 2008, 05:39 AM   #30
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incurable View Post
For the record, I don't view this as an obsessive and useless query. I view it more as fact finding. The only problem is, the facts are hard to substantiate w/Rolex being so tight lipped. Hearsay and opinions are plentiful, facts not so much...
Very true, Pat.....but haven't Rolex always been claiming that their bracelets are crafted as carefully as the rest of the watch and with the same material?

Just something I've heard very often!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright Đ2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.