ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 October 2017, 12:30 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: John
Location: OH IO
Posts: 539
|
Sub vs Sub ND
I know this has been discussed many of times I'm sure but can't find the thread. I like both versions myself but I haven't seen many new Ceramic ones for sale preowned lately on here or am I missing them, Sub ND yes. One more desirable over the other or something? Appreciate the feedback!
|
7 October 2017, 12:39 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 1,447
|
Few thoughts:
1) Both are awesome, so it's merely a personal preference. 2) I feel like the ND gets more "love" on TRF because it sticks to the roots of the Sub and a dive watch in general by not having a date. Nevertheless, I believe the date version is more popular overall outside of TRF (general population, non-Rolex enthusiasts). 3) I had the date version and loved it, and I really appreciated having the date since it was my daily wearer. However, if I had another watch with a date as my daily wearer (another Sub, a GMT, etc.), then I would go for the no date because I love the clean lines and symmetry of the dial and the fact that it is more "vintage" as in true to the roots of the Sub and a dive watch. In fact, the next time I keep two Rolex watches in my daily collection, I'll more than likely have one with a date (Hulk, BLNR, etc.) and the no date Sub to compliment it (of course, until I finally get the call for the Daytona C in which case that one will rule them all).
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV (Hulk) Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO (Pepsi) Rolex Daytona 116500LN (White) |
7 October 2017, 12:57 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: John
Location: OH IO
Posts: 539
|
Quote:
|
|
7 October 2017, 01:05 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 178
|
Well, I just plunked down a pile of cash for an 114060, so that's my choice:-)
Last edited by Timetracker; 7 October 2017 at 01:08 AM.. Reason: Mispelling |
7 October 2017, 01:34 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
|
7 October 2017, 01:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex Sub 116610LN
Posts: 52
|
I have just bought a Sub C Date 116610LN. I was on various lists for the non date Sub 114060 but when it came to it I could not give up the date feature. The 114060 looks a little more symmetrical and is slightly better looking as a result but for me, practicality won the day and it had to have a date. If you don't need the date the 114060 is a fine looking watch.
|
7 October 2017, 01:42 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
|
I have owned both and prefer the date. The thread below might help!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=7321504 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 October 2017, 01:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,750
|
Not being a big fan of the cylops (my only cyclops are on my GMT's) and seeing as I have a 14060m I vote 114060
|
7 October 2017, 02:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
I prefer no date, I don't like cyclops
|
7 October 2017, 02:09 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Jason
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 269
|
I prefer ND.. I think it's so popular that the grey market inventory turns over quickly. You'll find the right one!
|
7 October 2017, 02:58 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Uk
Posts: 138
|
No date for me im not a fan of the cyclops
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 October 2017, 03:00 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex pair
Posts: 1,912
|
Quote:
I too had to choose between the two, but went for the classic one. The cyclops and date were the deal breaker, for a first and only Rolex i had to get what i liked the most. Down the road, i might add a date version also, as i love sunburst dials. |
|
7 October 2017, 03:00 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Congrats! That deserves its own incoming thread... and pics
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
7 October 2017, 03:06 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Mick
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,524
|
My vote is no date for the reason previously mentioned:
It seems to me against the spirit of a diving watch. Now for a GMT - the date & cyclops - Yes Please! |
7 October 2017, 03:08 AM | #15 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,384
|
Quote:
|
|
7 October 2017, 03:08 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
I agree
__________________
Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
7 October 2017, 03:10 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1,376
|
The more I see the no date the more I start to like it. But I legitimately use my Sub Date for its actual purpose of knowing the date quite often so I don't think I could make the switch.
|
7 October 2017, 03:12 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16613T
Posts: 92
|
Get one of each!!
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
__________________
16234 116710 116610LV 114060 16613T |
7 October 2017, 03:17 AM | #19 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,176
|
ND is classic but the date version is more popular and easier to sell when the time comes.
|
7 October 2017, 03:39 AM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Dave
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,680
|
|
7 October 2017, 04:02 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
I went for ND. Besides heritage, the relatively small dial looks better without the cyclop imo.
Than again, if this is your only watch go for the date model.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
7 October 2017, 04:31 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,599
|
Had a ND sold it ,desperately thought I wanted a SubC date bought one & never wore it . Sold it & bought a 16610LV & couldn't be happier .But if I had to choose between the Sub ND or Date It would be the SubC date every time .
|
7 October 2017, 04:34 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
Submariner > Submariner Date. Always.
|
7 October 2017, 04:37 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Dblue
Posts: 6,723
|
cyclops #1!
|
7 October 2017, 04:48 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
That should be Sub Vs Sub Date.
|
7 October 2017, 04:58 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 178
|
|
7 October 2017, 06:02 AM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Dave
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,680
|
|
7 October 2017, 07:38 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,225
|
+1
They are the two most mispresented models on the forum. It's baffling considering they are the two most widely regarded models. lol. The Submariner is pure and relaxed with a simple symmetrical dial. However to pick an only watch between the two then it's the Submariner Date for functionality.
__________________
There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner. You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S. www.instagram.com/sutatshorology Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW) |
7 October 2017, 08:40 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston
Watch: And listen
Posts: 690
|
The debate of sub v. Sub date is endless. When you make a decision, reach out to one of the trusted sellers. They will hook you up in no time.
__________________
" Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to become pirates." ---- Mark Twain |
7 October 2017, 10:29 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Galaxy
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 905
|
No Date for me. It's just so clean and perfect though a date function is very useful.
If people want a date, and don't like the bubble, the Sea Dweller is calling out to them. The 40mm version is a great compromise. |
Tags |
submariner , submariner date |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.