ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31 January 2018, 02:10 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 24
|
Need help deciding between a Submariner 114060 and a Black Bay Steel 79730
Hello All,
I have been doing research in the past couple weeks to decide on my first purchase. Personally, I’m not a big fan of the iconic cyclops and I have got a relatively small wrist. That narrowed my options down to the Rolex Submariner 114060 and Tudor Heritage Black Bay Steel 79730. However, it is a difficult decision to make, and I’m hoping to get some advice/ suggestions from your expertise. I have listed some of the major differences/ concerns between the two to ease the comparison. Any input is very much appreciated! Design The Submariner (especially this no date model) is probably one of the most classic, versatile and timeless design on the market, full of history. The laser engraved flange ring also completes the design. It’s a Rolex!! No further explanation is required I guess. The Black Bay seems to be a more modern/technical design which is worth mentioning, the military style really gives it a robust, aggressive and unique appearance. On a side note, as an “only watch”, the date window is very convenient but the overall casual design is not as versatile as the Sub. I have also heard the minor details are not too perfect/ aligned, but I’m not sure if that’s a frequent issue. I know this might come down to personal preference, but a second opinion always helps to provide an all-around perspective. Movement Submariner: Calibre3130, 48-hour Power Reserve, -2/+2 sec/day Black Bay: MT5612, 70-hour Power Reserve, -4/+6 sec/day The Sub seems to have a much more accurate/premium movement but the Black Bay’s Power Reserve is almost 1 day longer. Do you think this difference is significant when it comes to a practical measure? Do you recommend to use a watch winder when it’s unworn? Bezel Ceramic vs. Steel. I’m wondering if someone can share their experience about the materials. Although the ceramic bezel is more scratch-resistant, is it more fragile at the same time? Is it going to crack/shatter easily? For the steel bezel, I guess scratches and dings are inevitable? But that doesn’t really concern me as much unless they appear to be super significant. Bracelet This is a no-brainer for me, the Glidelock system is definitely one of the x-factors and makes a world of a difference. Having said that, are the 3-hole increments good enough for day-to-day use in your experience? Price Submariner: Approx. $7500 Black Bay: Approx: $3500 Even though I’m not planning to flip it at all as this is going to be my first watch, but there is a big difference in the price. Considering the Black Bay costs less than half of the Sub, I’m uncertain if the overall performance differentiates that much. On the other hand, if I do decide to purchase the other one as well later on, the price increase of the Sub will definitely be much more significant than the Black Bay. What do you guys think? Many Thanks in advance for your kind response, advice and guidance! Please also let me know if there are other important areas should be considered in the decision making process. Cheers! |
31 January 2018, 02:35 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
In my opinion ... my 2 cents ...
Get the Sub now before price hikes ... it has all the upgrades you want ... It’s timeless as you mentioned; it’s classic, robust, ceramic bezel, elegant, versatile, has the glidelock and if I’m going to spend more than $2K on a watch it better damn well keep excellent time... Don’t get me wrong on the Tudor , it’s a fantastic watch !!! It really comes down to your personal preference. How much do you really want the Sub C ??? Happy hunting ... Btw: I have a Sub c date with CYCLOPS!!! I love it ... !!! Couldn’t have a no date watch as an only watch without a date function... |
31 January 2018, 02:39 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
Rolex
|
31 January 2018, 03:09 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 46
|
Get the 114060. I fear you get the Tudor and spend 3k and wish you had the Rolex. Both great watches as others have said but the 114060 really is many steps ahead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
31 January 2018, 03:27 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
|
Sub
|
31 January 2018, 04:50 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cupertino, CA
Watch: Apple Watch 42mm
Posts: 833
|
Well, I can only share my experience with you and let you decide where you want to go with it.
So for me, I strongly believe in "to each, his/her own". I got the 116610LV & was so glad with it. It became a near daily wearer until it started to get old on me. And I wanted something else. I got the pelagos & kept the submariner instead. And now, I'm in love with the pelagos. I like having the different color bezels. And one day out of the blue, I thought well maybe I should have additional variety in life, so to break the monotony of wearing the same pelagos, I went back to the sub. My previous feelings about it growing old were no longer there. I loved the sub even more. Conclusion? Try to get both & alternate them. Don't wear one constantly or it could grow old on you. If you are on a tight budget, I would say choose the Tudor. Disclaimer - I did not do any research to check if the Black Bay Steel has the same movement (although I think it does) as the pelagos. If you are worried about the price increase in the submariner in future, I am also certain that you would progress in life and draw a higher salary one when that day comes. So it would definitely remain affordable. :) My 20c worth. |
31 January 2018, 11:06 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 24
|
Thank you very much for your feedback! I can't help it but I keep thinking of the vulnerability of the ceramic bezel, I mean I would definitely be super careful with the timepiece..But a crack after a small hit? That sounds scary tbh, has anyone break their bezel? Appreciate the experience you share!
|
31 January 2018, 11:25 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
|
31 January 2018, 11:44 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Watch: Sub C LV,
Posts: 490
|
I've been wearing a ceramic Sub 24-7 for 7 years and haven't had any issues with the bezel nor any other part of the watch. The watch keeps great time, and other than a few minor daily wear scratches still looks great. from 2 feet away it looks new. (at least to my old eyes). You can never go wrong with a Sub.
|
31 January 2018, 11:49 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,944
|
Having owned (and currently own) both Tudors and Rolex pieces, I say go with the Sub.
__________________
Current Rolex Submariner 126610LN || Cartier Tank Americaine |
31 January 2018, 11:53 PM | #11 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
31 January 2018, 11:53 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I can not believe this is even up for debate
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
31 January 2018, 11:56 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Michigan
Watch: 16610
Posts: 319
|
The Sub.
You'll like the Tudor but you'll wish you got the one you really wanted. |
1 February 2018, 12:00 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,433
|
I have a Sub and a Tudor Black Bay. Sub first!
|
1 February 2018, 12:04 AM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,417
|
Rolex was very clear that Rolex and Tudor would never be confused with or compete with each other. They are not the same watch or share the same heritage. If you really want a Rolex, a Tudor will not satisfy that requirement any more than a BAUME et MERCIER could.
__________________
|
1 February 2018, 12:08 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,367
|
Quote:
|
|
1 February 2018, 12:19 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,945
|
Quote:
You've overlooked the absolute most important aspect, and that's trying each one on and seeing how you like it on your wrist. Forget the research and start hunting some watches down to try on. Who knows...you may even find something you like better. |
|
1 February 2018, 12:25 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 1,447
|
Sub 114060 easily IMO.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV (Hulk) Rolex GMT Master II 126710BLRO (Pepsi) Rolex Daytona 116500LN (White) |
1 February 2018, 12:25 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Great White North
Watch: 114060
Posts: 39
|
I spent months going back and forth between a lot of different options before I finally went down to the AD to try on a 114060 (call first). The second I saw it and tried it on my wrist I knew it was the right one. I didn't like the case thickness of the Black Bay. I got my 114060 frond DSW second hand so I saved a bit of money.
|
1 February 2018, 03:19 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 24
|
Thank you guys and you are absolutely correct there. I will go for the sub and find an omega/Tudor with date to satisfy my militaristic desire later on if it really bugs me
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.