ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2018, 11:28 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
Black Bay Fifty-eight review
If anyone cares to read an owners one month review, I've posted one here.
https://sweepinghand.home.blog/2018/...y-fifty-eight/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
8 August 2018, 12:47 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US
Posts: 422
|
Great write up Watchmaven! Thanks.
|
8 August 2018, 12:53 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
8 August 2018, 01:21 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,644
|
Great review, thanks.
|
8 August 2018, 06:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Sheffield, AL USA
Posts: 35
|
Thank you for the excellent review.
|
8 August 2018, 07:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Lowlands
Watch: White 'n Black
Posts: 641
|
Thanks for this great review Watchmavan! Very detailed en still fun to
Read. Nice to read. I’m considering a 58 now to accompagnie my sub instead of an explorer. One question: how does the BB 58 wear compared to the explorer? For now i think my explorer 2 40mm is my most comfortable watch, but the BB 58 must be comfortable too? Thanks Tom Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk |
8 August 2018, 07:58 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
Black Bay Fifty-eight review
Thanks for the positive feedback. Very comfortable but is any watch as comfortable as an Explorer? It wears bigger than its dimensions due to the still straight up Black Bay design.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
8 August 2018, 08:12 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
awesome review. ty sir.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
8 August 2018, 03:43 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Here and there
Posts: 154
|
Very good review and pictures, thanks a lot ;-)
|
9 August 2018, 05:46 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 69
|
Great
|
9 August 2018, 05:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: 114270
Posts: 120
|
Nice review, how accurate is it? My 79230N is running at +2 per week!
|
9 August 2018, 09:13 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Milkyway
Watch: All of them
Posts: 23
|
Nice read, thanks
|
9 August 2018, 09:25 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
|
15 September 2018, 07:08 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Wadim
Location: Poland
Watch: Rolex ref. 14270
Posts: 28
|
One of the best watches presented at Basel this year. Great review, thanks.
|
23 September 2018, 02:50 AM | #15 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Algarve
Watch: Torn between a few
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Quote:
IzNoGuud |
||
7 October 2018, 12:23 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Jakub
Location: London
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 17
|
Great review!
|
11 October 2018, 08:05 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Madrid
Posts: 13
|
Cheers
|
12 October 2018, 03:32 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,027
|
Best review yet!
__________________
RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager |
12 October 2018, 05:10 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
|
12 October 2018, 06:53 PM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,235
|
Nice review!
I might have mentioned in the text that the rivets are cosmetic (not true rivets). |
12 October 2018, 07:08 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,460
|
Nice work M.
__________________
E |
12 October 2018, 07:59 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
|
12 October 2018, 07:59 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
|
12 October 2018, 09:12 PM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,632
|
Well done
|
21 November 2018, 01:52 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,411
|
Great review.
|
21 November 2018, 02:23 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Thank you!
|
23 November 2018, 10:04 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: California
Watch: 94010 M.N. 81
Posts: 14
|
great review, i appreciate it
|
28 December 2018, 12:06 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Greg
Location: Camarillo, ca
Watch: Tudor Blackbay 58
Posts: 17
|
Great review. I sold my original BB in order to buy the newer 58. I was waiting 3 months for my local AD to get one in stock, love it.
|
28 December 2018, 12:31 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Watch: Polar 16570
Posts: 1,185
|
|
1 February 2019, 12:43 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 133
|
As many others have commented, great review. Your writing and photography are top notch. Bravo!
I was smitten by the 58 based on several reviews (very few as eloquently written as yours), but after trying the 58 back to back on my wrist with the 41, I chose the 41. Yes, it's "bulkier", but I don't find the extra bulk a distraction after the watch bracelet was properly sized, and like the "presence" on the wrist. I also agree that the 58's thinner case is a benefit, but again the 41 only disturbed me when looking at it from the side. On the wrist, under a cuff, the "side slab" isn't visible. With more casual wear it is visible, but again, for me, the extra bulk isn't an issue, and to some degree I think it complements the larger size case. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.