ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 December 2018, 02:14 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
Bought New Seiko 1978 Golden Tuna but make crucial mistake.
I stumbled upon on of these 1978 Golden Tuna reissues last week at a Seiko boutique.
Been interested in the vintage one for awhile, but didn't want to deal with the possible headaches associated with an 40yr example....servicing...etc. So this really caught my eye...I did most of the QC checks...crown was smooth...date worked...no dust under crystal. Cool. I bought it. Then couple of days later (wore it in the daylight) I noticed what I forgot to check and should have checked first given Seiko's track record. The dreaded chapter ring is misaligned. $%$$! Of course this all I see now when I look at the watch. Being a limited edition piece, there are no more that can be swapped out, so off to Seiko service it goes. The boutique agrees that it wasn't right and it's worth sending to service, but as accommodating as they are, word on the forums is that Seiko Service considers this to be acceptable and usually doesn't "fix" the issue....They usually just send a letter saying it's all good, don't bother us with that silly nonsense. So, I'm afraid I'm in for some drama....why Seiko can't install the chapter rings in alignment I have no idea.... So, if you buy one of these and this "flaw" bothers you, check it out throughly because Seiko screws up the chapter rings even on their limited, higher end references... |
19 December 2018, 10:41 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ellijay, GA
Posts: 1,504
|
Is this issue due to the printing of the marks on the ring or the physical alignment of the entire ring? If it's the latter, this would be a simple fix for an independent. I'd do it for you as well.
|
20 December 2018, 12:56 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
i have heard that the issue can be either installation error or printing defect.
If Seiko doesn't resolve, I'll take you up on your offer! Thanks! |
20 December 2018, 10:37 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Austin Tx
Watch: Sub-C
Posts: 510
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
20 December 2018, 01:56 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
|
20 December 2018, 01:57 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
I think on some of the newer watches the chapter ring has feet on them so they can't move much. At least that is what I was told once before. I haven't personally looked at one myself.
|
20 December 2018, 01:58 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
Quote:
Congrats on a cool watch. |
|
20 December 2018, 02:47 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Usa
Watch: All
Posts: 1,418
|
Dude. I’m ocd. Alignment is literally my job. That looks fine
|
20 December 2018, 02:50 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: SEIKO TUNA
Posts: 28,610
|
It would be OK for a Turtle, but the rehaut does look like it's shifted clockwise slightly, which I wouldn't accept on a higher end LE piece like this.
__________________
_______________________ |
20 December 2018, 05:00 PM | #10 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
The chapter ring is so off that the second hand won't hit the 12 o'clock marker at all. It's off a second left and right, so no direct hit on 12. They might be able to get me another one rather than sending it back for.service. It just shouldn't be this way on a LE piece. We shall see what happens. |
|
20 December 2018, 05:14 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: hong kong
Posts: 43
|
I would more concern if the second hand actually is dead on the minute markers for a quartz movement
Seiko's QC is rather poor for there are complaints about the misalignment of the hour and minute hands when you wind to 6:00..do remember to check this next time before you pay for it. |
21 December 2018, 03:32 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
|
1 January 2019, 06:37 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
The saga continues.
Seiko was able to get me a replacement watch. It was aligned worse than the first one and the indice at 6 o'clock had poorly applied paint....it never even made it into my hands, the store rejected it due to the defects. So, my original watch goes to Seiko service to get the CR aligned. The store has been very gracious in assisting me, so no issues there, but why these are coming out of Japan with issues, especially on a LE piece, is quite fascinating... |
1 January 2019, 09:44 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: England
Posts: 518
|
|
1 January 2019, 10:12 PM | #15 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 46,758
|
It should be right. You paid a fair amount of money for this watch and I hope Seiko will make it right. Keep us posted.
|
2 January 2019, 03:15 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
The store didn't disagree with me at all regarding the defect, so we shall see what happens next. |
|
10 January 2019, 01:24 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Kevin M Warner
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: hard to pick one
Posts: 185
|
Best of luck to you with getting it resolved. I agree this shouldn't be with a LE piece . . . shouldn't be with any ProSpex piece. However, just as Seiko has their issues with chapter rings . . . I have seen many Rolex Submariners and Sea Dwellers that have bezels that don't line up. Go figure!
|
10 January 2019, 01:26 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Kevin M Warner
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: hard to pick one
Posts: 185
|
|
24 January 2019, 05:28 PM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
So just a quick update...
The lesson here is NOT to impulse buy Seiko without thorough and complete examining of the QC. I suppose this could be said for any brand, but considering the confusion within Seiko service that this problem is causing, I feel compelled to single them out. So, the Tuna is at Seiko COSERV in NJ and it appears to be stuck in some sort of watchmaking /service quicksand. Apparently since it is a LE reference there are multiple parties in the company involved and nobody is quite sure what to do...well this and some key manager that is supposed to handle this sort of thing is never really there to actually handle this sort of thing. So the wait continues. I am curious as to how much longer this will take to make a decision to fix it (or deny it is an issue) and get the watch back to me. Left to their own devices, without me bugging them to death, how long would it organically take to resolve this on their own?....It will be interesting to find out. The store has been very helpful and responsive, so I can't knock them in all of this.... So, again, if you buy a higher end Seiko, check everything that might bother you before you buy it.... Will update when I know more....any bets how much longer it will be?...lol |
24 January 2019, 05:45 PM | #20 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,310
|
Well I for one could see the issue but perhaps there was nothing out of specification.
We have discussed ad nauseum the potential problems faced when we return new watches for warranty work justified or otherwise. The store would agree with you as ‘the customer is always right’. Will wait for an update.
__________________
E |
25 January 2019, 05:03 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
The ring is shifted 25s forward.
I am not sure I would even mess with it. But regarding the vintage quartz watches....the Seiko movements were made very well...if you picked up a good example it would last you a very long time. I have a 6159-7010 which is an amazing piece of Seiko tech considering when it was made. 36k bph movements are amazing to listen to. |
31 January 2019, 04:37 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SC
Watch: 16600
Posts: 198
|
Any updates on this?
I'm close to pulling the trigger on the SBBN040 but unfortunately I will have to purchase it online without examining for misalignment. I think this is the 1st misaligned chapter ring for this watch S23626/SBBN040 I've seen posted online. Hopefully yours get fixed or replaced asap.
__________________
|
1 February 2019, 05:50 AM | #23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
The watch is now in the service system for "repair", which it seems that Seiko has agreed that there is indeed a problem and are working to resolve it..not sure what that will entail....so they didn't flat out reject it as "within spec"...well at least not yet. The have had the watch for about 6weeks now. The store ordered another one for me, to expedite things, but that chapter ring was off center as well and the marker @ 6'o'clock was messed up too. The store refused it and sent it back. So, I am a Seiko fan and have too many of them already, I say that to avert the flaming I will be getting for my next statement. There is something wrong with the QC @ Seiko. Two $2400 quartz LE watches the dealer got were not right. The second one was essentially unsaleable. Clearly they can get things very right when you look at the quality of the GS line, but when it comes to some of their other references, including LE like this Tuna reissue, there is not that attention to detail. So, that being said, if you are interested in this reference and things like misaligned chapter rings etc would bother you, then I would not buy one until you can actually look at it in person or at least look at good, clear pics of the actual watch you will be getting. If you get a bad one, it takes time and effort to get it looked at....let alone get it resolved. Like I said originally, I clearly made a mistake when buying this watch. It was a surprise impulse buy and I didn't fully check it for everything...that is on me and the misaligned chapter ring is on them. Don't be like me! |
|
1 February 2019, 06:25 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Jon
Location: Reno, NV
Watch: 126710 BLRO
Posts: 1,027
|
I had to send in my SBDC051 (not an LE, just a standard 6R15 diver) for the same issue. It went to the NJ service center. They had it for over a month before finally notifying me they were sending it back without doing anything. I called them up immediately and was told by the "technician" (Note: NOT a watchmaker) that it was fully within Spec and didn't warrant a replacement chapter ring. He even went so far as to tell me "No alignment of chapter rings is ever 100% correct." That's BS. I got him to admit that it was not perfect, but he wouldn't touch it. For a brand new $1000 watch, it shouldn't have that issue, IMO. Same goes for Marine Masters and these golden Tuna's. Luckily, my MM300 SBDX017 doesn't have the issue.
My GMT II LN rehaut engraving isn't perfectly aligned, either, but I can live with it because it's not something I am constantly looking at and noticing. I have to go out of my way to see it. But a minute track misalignment is distinctly evident... |
1 February 2019, 07:25 AM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
The thing is if they are going to make LE references for collectors and enthusiasts, they have to be right. We know they can do it because the GS are usually spot on, so that needs to transfer over the the other lines in terms of at least blocking and tackling. Make sure it's lined up...that's it. |
|
19 February 2019, 04:09 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
|
<<<<<<UPDATE>>>>>>>
The Tuna has returned. Seiko decided that the chapter ring was indeed an issue and they fixed it. Not sure whether they replaced the ring or adjusted it, but it's centered now and the seconds hand hits the markers. The boutique did a great job in facilitating the repair, so all in all the outcome was very good. I do think Seiko is having a bit of an issue with QC, but they fixed it and that's ok with me. |
19 February 2019, 08:54 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: UK
Posts: 1,174
|
Good to hear
The crucial mistake I made was to read this thread and then check the chapter ring on my new turtle |
19 February 2019, 08:59 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,422
|
All's well that ends well. Good to hear they took care of you.
|
19 February 2019, 09:37 PM | #29 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 46,758
|
I am glad it is right for you. Great watch.
|
20 February 2019, 12:21 AM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,598
|
Nice that you got it resolved, time to enjoy it
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.