ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JSL420 · 14 May 2019, 02:05 PM

Yes the sports watches are in demand now but just look at this piece, Rolex Cellini Prince!

Full white gold (yellow and rose), unique, beautiful and elegant, the only Rolex with displayed caseback, fantastic movement and decoration

IMO it’s rolex effort to challenge the holy trinity in the game of haute horlogerie

it failed, it became a watch that nobody wants, the second hand value dropped almost 50% of its retail price, even OP holds better value than this

What do you think?

JSL420 · 14 May 2019, 02:06 PM

Pictures from Hodinkee
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ce...ows-and-should

Rocket launcher · 14 May 2019, 03:56 PM

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

Zakalwe · 14 May 2019, 04:08 PM

I suspect these may become collectible in a few decades, having many of the hallmarks:

- Low production numbers
- “Unusual” Rolex design
- Unappreciated in its time
- Unique features for a Rolex (shape of the case, display case-back etc)

Nevertheless I don’t particularly care for it. Potential for collectibility would be the only reason I’d even consider it over a Reverso. But not for very long.

Ian Macdermott · 14 May 2019, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket launcher

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

I take it your not a fan.

crowncollection · 14 May 2019, 04:42 PM

nice piece imho

steve099 · 14 May 2019, 04:58 PM

I like it.

padi56 · 14 May 2019, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zakalwe

I suspect these may become collectible in a few decades, having many of the hallmarks:

- Low production numbers
- “Unusual” Rolex design
- Unappreciated in its time
- Unique features for a Rolex (shape of the case, display case-back etc)

Nevertheless I don’t particularly care for it. Potential for collectibility would be the only reason I’d even consider it over a Reverso. But not for very long.

There is only one Rolex Prince IMHO and its not the modern day one although its a fine watch with a great movement.

1934 Rolex Prince doctor style dial 17 jewel.

1932 Rolex Prince 15 jewel

faimag · 14 May 2019, 05:01 PM

For this case shape, I very much prefer a JLC Reverso.

Boba Fett · 14 May 2019, 05:07 PM

I love it.
That model line will be desirable in the future but is highly undervalued now.
I love that it's so different from the usual Rolex models and has some unique features, case shape, movement etc. I feel there is a fetish for new SS sports on this forum and little interest in anything else.

Brew · 14 May 2019, 06:19 PM

I prefer Padi's versions. The new one is excessively clunky, imo.

Shaney · 14 May 2019, 06:59 PM

It's smart and intricate.

Like it.

Sublovin · 14 May 2019, 09:05 PM

I wouldn’t say it’s “challenging” the trinity. There is nothing complicated about the watch. The Skydweller is much more horologically advanced

JSL420 · 14 May 2019, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sublovin

I wouldn’t say it’s “challenging” the trinity. There is nothing complicated about the watch. The Skydweller is much more horologically advanced

IMO Rolex never really spent much effort decorating its movements, it’s core strengths are the reliability and practicality.

Yes it’s a simple time only piece, but it’s finishing is brilliant, don’t think any other Rolex movements have this kind of treatment

If the Cellini Prince was a success, perhaps Rolex would be making modern minute repeaters, tourbillons... etc

jaySL350 · 14 May 2019, 10:00 PM

Gotta love a 1920s dress watch
One of the original Sunbeam dials before the sunburst. ,

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JSL420 · 14 May 2019, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaySL350

Gotta love a 1920s dress watch
One of the original Sunbeam dials before the sunburst. ,

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Amazing dial!

Watch Rob · 14 May 2019, 10:28 PM

Like!

nicon · 14 May 2019, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSL420

IMO it’s rolex effort to challenge the holy trinity in the game of haute horlogerie

What do you think?

3 hander with simple movement, real HH challenge

ppalasthira · 14 May 2019, 10:30 PM

Dunno. Back in the day probably looked better.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MTdweller · 14 May 2019, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket launcher

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

Not interested, eh?

Monty22 · 14 May 2019, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket launcher

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

Yawn

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

VFA · 14 May 2019, 11:48 PM

I like it. I think its more interesting than a time only reverso.

Pauln · 15 May 2019, 12:07 AM

I like the look of the watch. But have never held one, so not sure about size, clunkiness.

airchitect · 15 May 2019, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket launcher

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

Archie? Is that you?

Navarino · 15 May 2019, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by airchitect

Archie? Is that you?

ian.thomas · 15 May 2019, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocket launcher

That watch is hideously horrendously horrible
It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude
And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself....

I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners......
I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

Agree

Largoshark · 15 May 2019, 03:38 PM

I've never paid much attention to this reference. Just noticing the hand on the seconds subdial, and I find the shape particularly unappealing. Just doesn't work with the rest of the dial IMO.

frankfrazetta · 15 May 2019, 04:36 PM

Whatever floats your boat. I think it's ugly.

2001jesper · 15 May 2019, 04:41 PM

Would wear it, but not pay for it

JSL420 · 16 May 2019, 06:28 PM

When Rolex decided to decorate its movement, developed a new rectangular only for one particular model, it shouldn’t be overlooked

14 May 2019, 04:08 PM	#4
Zakalwe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Real Name: Sal Location: London Posts: 2,496	I suspect these may become collectible in a few decades, having many of the hallmarks: - Low production numbers - “Unusual” Rolex design - Unappreciated in its time - Unique features for a Rolex (shape of the case, display case-back etc) Nevertheless I don’t particularly care for it. Potential for collectibility would be the only reason I’d even consider it over a Reverso. But not for very long. __________________ “Never argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." - Mark Twain

14 May 2019, 04:42 PM	#6
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,214	nice piece imho __________________ watches many

14 May 2019, 09:05 PM	#13
Sublovin 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Watch: Lots Posts: 4,584	I wouldn’t say it’s “challenging” the trinity. There is nothing complicated about the watch. The Skydweller is much more horologically advanced __________________ DSSD is the king of all Rolex

14 May 2019, 02:06 PM	#2
JSL420 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Asia Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 149	Pictures from Hodinkee https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ce...ows-and-should

14 May 2019, 03:56 PM	#3
Rocket launcher Banned Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: England Posts: 989	That watch is hideously horrendously horrible It is an abomination of monstrous magnitude And to wear it would mean you are in league with lucifer himself.... I would leave well alone and stick with steel sports stunners...... I would rather own a 40mm busy dial Air-King

14 May 2019, 04:58 PM	#7
steve099 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Real Name: Steve Location: Australia Watch: 116619LB Posts: 564	I like it.

14 May 2019, 05:01 PM	#9
faimag "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: US, SG, DK, GR Watch: Reverso Posts: 3,089	For this case shape, I very much prefer a JLC Reverso.

14 May 2019, 05:07 PM	#10
Boba Fett "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: Kamino Watch: Star Wars Posts: 382	I love it. That model line will be desirable in the future but is highly undervalued now. I love that it's so different from the usual Rolex models and has some unique features, case shape, movement etc. I feel there is a fetish for new SS sports on this forum and little interest in anything else.

14 May 2019, 06:19 PM	#11
Brew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Real Name: Larry Location: Finger Lakes Posts: 6,007	I prefer Padi's versions. The new one is excessively clunky, imo.

14 May 2019, 06:59 PM	#12
Shaney "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Location: Scotland Posts: 191	It's smart and intricate. Like it.

14 May 2019, 10:00 PM	#15
jaySL350 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: jay Location: North London Watch: BBG,Hulk,16013,DJB Posts: 3,278	Gotta love a 1920s dress watch One of the original Sunbeam dials before the sunburst. , Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

14 May 2019, 10:28 PM	#17
Watch Rob "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Chicago Watch: 114200 Posts: 1,265	Like!

14 May 2019, 10:30 PM	#19
ppalasthira Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: ASK Watch: SubC.5711.D500 Posts: 2,236	Dunno. Back in the day probably looked better. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

14 May 2019, 11:48 PM	#22
VFA "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: SG Posts: 391	I like it. I think its more interesting than a time only reverso.

15 May 2019, 12:07 AM	#23
Pauln "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Paul Location: Colorado Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,543	I like the look of the watch. But have never held one, so not sure about size, clunkiness.

15 May 2019, 03:38 PM	#27
Largoshark "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2017 Real Name: Mike Location: New England Posts: 1,754	I've never paid much attention to this reference. Just noticing the hand on the seconds subdial, and I find the shape particularly unappealing. Just doesn't work with the rest of the dial IMO.

15 May 2019, 04:36 PM	#28
frankfrazetta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2018 Location: Norman, OK Watch: SubC, Explorer II Posts: 203	Whatever floats your boat. I think it's ugly.

15 May 2019, 04:41 PM	#29
2001jesper "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Real Name: Jesper Location: Earth Watch: 116234 Posts: 1,755	Would wear it, but not pay for it

16 May 2019, 06:28 PM	#30
JSL420 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2018 Location: Asia Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 149	When Rolex decided to decorate its movement, developed a new rectangular only for one particular model, it shouldn’t be overlooked

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)