The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 June 2020, 06:19 AM   #1
Douglas9700
2024 Pledge Member
 
Douglas9700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Greg
Location: SO CA
Watch: Subs
Posts: 312
Sweet spot for watch size

I'll preface this with recognizing how fortunate we are to be health and happy (my deliberation seems really trivial)....but here goes anyway: Always wanted a classic 1680 on a leather strap - after searching for a very long time, found the right watch locally and with a full service and all the correct R parts. Now I found the right strap for the vintage look I was going for. Still debating with the size as I'm used to wearing a Sub C on a rubber strap which looks bigger to me - I'm a good sized guy and have taken a liking to a bigger looking watch. Anyone else have these type deliberations in finding the sweet spot for watch size?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3106-1.jpg (97.0 KB, 767 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3109.jpg (118.9 KB, 773 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3110.jpg (99.6 KB, 762 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3114.jpg (98.2 KB, 757 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3115.jpg (85.5 KB, 759 views)
Douglas9700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:22 AM   #2
DG123
"TRF" Member
 
DG123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Watch: Oyster Perpetual
Posts: 1,629
For everyday men’s watch 34mm to 36mm makes good sense.
For a diving watch (or other sport application) 40 mm makes good sense.
DG123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:30 AM   #3
TellingTime
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Over here
Posts: 143
We’re all different, 39- 42mm is ideal to me, and feels the most natural.
TellingTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:31 AM   #4
42itus
"TRF" Member
 
42itus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
The 1680 looks great on you! It might take some getting used to because of the heft of the 116610.
I actually have skinny wrists 6.5 and I wear 36mm to 44mm. For me anything between a 36-40 is a pretty sure thing as far as fit. Any larger and it depends on the watch and lug design.
42itus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:33 AM   #5
-dustin
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Dustin
Location: A, TX
Posts: 1,668
Had a 16570, which followed a Pelagos and IWC Pilot's Chrono. The 16570 felt just too small. Pilot's Chrono felt massive. My wrists are about 7 1/4". I then got a 216570 and feel this is spot on. Problem is I don't know if it's case size, or dial size. I can handle slightly too large. Slightly too small is a deal killer, however.
-dustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:38 AM   #6
Rado63
"TRF" Member
 
Rado63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
The 1680 would probably look a little larger on the steel bracelet. Steel bracelet also fills up all of the space between the case and the strap. The modern sub ceramic with the wider lugs looks a good size on that rubber strap. Overall the modern watch just looks bigger because the indices are bigger, and the bezel slightly wider I guess, and the case design. I never measured a 1680 but if it measures at 40mm then both are 40mm wide. If you like larger, get the 43mm SeaDweller and put it on a rubber strap, looks fantastic in my opinion.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235
Rado63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:39 AM   #7
Jpccarguy
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: In the Present
Posts: 1,018
When I went from a 36 mm DJ to a 44 mm GS SD diver, I thought I'd gone too big (17 cm wrist). It didn't take long to adjust, it's easier to read, and now I'm on the list for a SkyDweller. First impressions may not be your long-term sense of it. Good luck with your choice, both are great.
Jpccarguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 06:58 AM   #8
lencap
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 133
A very good question, and one that I found is more complicated than I thought.

After reading through this forum, checking with several ADs, and consulting friends with watch collections the answers I received were are all over the board.

Here's a site that I thought gave a reasonable way to decide for yourself what may be best for you:

https://theslenderwrist.com/watch-size-guide/

Also consider that today's integrated bands often extend the lug to lug distance. Look at the 39mm Rolex Oyster Perpetual, for example. The integrated bracelet has "horns" that extend the lug-lug length slightly, but enough to be potentially noticeable depending on your wrist size and shape.
lencap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 07:03 AM   #9
MickCollins1916
2024 Pledge Member
 
MickCollins1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,270
My wrist is 7 inches, and though I’ve worn watches as small as 34mm and as large as 44mm in the past, I know the range I feel the most comfortable in is 36-43mm. My real sweet spot is 39-42mm.

Lately, I’ve been rocking a 36mm DD most frequently, with a 41mm GS, 42mm PAM, and SD43 mixed in.

Totally normal question to be asking, but whatever looks and feels right to you is the best size.
MickCollins1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 07:14 AM   #10
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,661
IMO, the optimum watch size is a derivative of proportion to one’s body shape and personal taste. At a slim 6’5”, 7.25 wrist, I prefer 41mm-43mm, and currently own none less than 42mm.

Using average wrist size (181mm) data, and the current accepted perfect size watch of 40mm:

Wrist(mm) divided by 4.5
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”.
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 07:18 AM   #11
synrrgy
"TRF" Member
 
synrrgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California
Posts: 1,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
IMO, the optimum watch size is a derivative of proportion to one’s body shape and personal taste. At a slim 6’5”, 7.25 wrist, I prefer 41mm-43mm, and currently own none less than 42mm.
+1. For my body shape and personal taste, all my watches are no less than 40mm.
synrrgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 08:33 AM   #12
Yess
"TRF" Member
 
Yess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Good Hope
Watch: 124060
Posts: 1,596
The OP 39mm I have is too dainty on my wrist. It's not really case width it's more the thickness.

My Air-King suits the aesthetic I want far more. It's a thicker watch and I guess the extra mm adds to this.

Thing is, this is really subjective - I doubt anyone else in the world gives it any thought (unless I pester them about it!).
Yess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 08:40 AM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,198
I wear the watch, not the size.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 02:15 PM   #14
maxbelg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Belgium
Posts: 106
Here's a sweet spot watch size for my large hands...;-)

maxbelg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 02:21 PM   #15
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,442
Sometimes a 40mm looks big and sometimes it looks small?
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 0ADE2D45-B34C-45F4-9A35-1B3C6079BF1F.jpeg (151.5 KB, 541 views)
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 03:24 PM   #16
Johnpierpontmorgan
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Singapore
Posts: 545
36-40

One DJ 36mm

Three sports rolex 40mm
Johnpierpontmorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 03:45 PM   #17
LDN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 647
Subjective!
LDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 04:02 PM   #18
Ihatecheese
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: London
Posts: 978
I think everyone has these deliberations before spending any sizable chunk of money on something unnecessary! Trying to validate our new jewelry purchase's, against some kind of measure is always a challenge.
Ihatecheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 08:29 PM   #19
sutats
"TRF" Member
 
sutats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,225
Icon7

Everyday's a good day to be alive. 39.5mm is the sweet spot. From experience and general observation is that as watch wearers age we tend to do away with the brashy large pieces in favour of comfort and discretion. There is a corrollary aspect of personal safety as well.

We may even hit the point where we're 90 years old and wearing even a ribbon on the wrist feels uncomfortable and tiresome.
__________________
There's no such thing as a Submariner No Date, it's simply Submariner.
You don't call a Porsche 911 Turbo, a Porsche 911 Turbo No S.
www.instagram.com/sutatshorology
Post Your Rolex/Tudor Watch Weight (PYRTWW)
sutats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 09:39 PM   #20
Gwai
"TRF" Member
 
Gwai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Marc
Location: Germany
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxbelg View Post
Here's a sweet spot watch size for my large hands...;-)

That looks... tailored!

Cheers
Marc
Gwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 09:43 PM   #21
Gwai
"TRF" Member
 
Gwai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Marc
Location: Germany
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by 42itus View Post
The 1680 looks great on you! It might take some getting used to because of the heft of the 116610.
Exactly. I love the 1680 myself - that first profile shot of yours shows why - and hope to have one eventually.

Cheers
Marc
Gwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 09:44 PM   #22
brandrea
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I wear the watch, not the size.
Exactly this

I enjoy watches from 40mm to 47mm. As long as it’s comfortable on my wrist and I like the aesthetics
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 09:48 PM   #23
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,689
41-43mm is the sweet "zone" for me. Anything in that range works great for me. Last time I measured my wrist was around 7.75"

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 09:55 PM   #24
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I wear the watch, not the size.
Yep, and...

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Exactly this

I enjoy watches from 40mm to 47mm. As long as it’s comfortable on my wrist and I like the aesthetics
Yep.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 10:00 PM   #25
varun
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: NYC
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by lencap View Post
A very good question, and one that I found is more complicated than I thought.

After reading through this forum, checking with several ADs, and consulting friends with watch collections the answers I received were are all over the board.

Here's a site that I thought gave a reasonable way to decide for yourself what may be best for you:

https://theslenderwrist.com/watch-size-guide/

Also consider that today's integrated bands often extend the lug to lug distance. Look at the 39mm Rolex Oyster Perpetual, for example. The integrated bracelet has "horns" that extend the lug-lug length slightly, but enough to be potentially noticeable depending on your wrist size and shape.
thanks
varun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 10:03 PM   #26
1William
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,385
So much of watch size is an individual preference. Size has a lot to do with it, as like my clothing, I prefer for my watches to be proportional to my wrist size. Other factors play into it also, case design, lug length, thickness of the watch to just name a few. Is the watch on a bracelet or strap, etc. I am 6'6" tall and weigh 255 pounds and have a 7.5-7.75 inch wrist depending on the weather. I prefer watches from 40 mm to 50 mm and can wear most without issue. After wearing a larger watch, 47 mm Panerai for a few days, it takes me a bit to adjust to wearing a smaller watch. But I do and move on. Wear what you like and what feels good on your wrist. Simple.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 10:08 PM   #27
Marcjvr
"TRF" Member
 
Marcjvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,726
Sweet spot for watch size

Ryan Gosling and his 34mm air king

I am personally not a fan of the huge watch trend. I saw a guy with tiny wrists wearing the BLNR recently and it looked ridiculous. Looked like a 6 year old with his oversized toy watch.

Glad to see Ryan showing us that men can still wear 34mm






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Never place your happiness on something you have or can physically acquire
Marcjvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 11:13 PM   #28
ap1
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,487
39/40 for my 6.5 and I’d say for up to 7 on that
ap1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2020, 11:36 PM   #29
chinaski
"TRF" Member
 
chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SpeedyProExplorer1
Posts: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
I wear the watch, not the size.
When I was in my late teens (30 years ago), and starting out in this crazy hobby, I never was even concerned with size. If I liked the watch, I bought it and wore it.
chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2020, 02:17 AM   #30
Gwai
"TRF" Member
 
Gwai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Marc
Location: Germany
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinaski View Post
When I was in my late teens (30 years ago), and starting out in this crazy hobby, I never was even concerned with size. If I liked the watch, I bought it and wore it.
Which makes us pretty much the same age. Wish I hadn't started out in my 40s, though.

Cheers
Marc
Gwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
downsizing , getting older


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.