The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 August 2020, 06:43 PM   #1
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Jubilee bracelet link screw issue

Hello to all!

I'm a new member and was looking to get some information about a problem I've encountered. I've recently had 4 link screws replaced on my jubilee bracelet at an AD. Its a 2019 Date just (126234) and I've noticed the screws come up short on the thread side ruining the flush polished look of the bracelet. I've been told by the watchmaker these are the correct screws supplied by rolex and they will sit slightly lower, is this a common issue and is there anything I can do to achieve the factory finish look again? I hope the attached photo is clear enough it had to be resized
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg (103.9 KB, 400 views)
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 07:05 PM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,984
The most important thing with any screw is that they are tight and in the real world not supposed to be flush with anything just screwed down tight.And always best to check tightness regularly when wearing its a screw nothing more and would hardly call it ruining the look of your bracelet.Do you look at the screws when watch is on your wrist or do you look at the watch dial to tell you the time.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 07:23 PM   #3
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,445
At this level and the price point of the engineering I would expect the distance from the shoulder at the thread to the end of the screw head to be exactly the same as the original screw.

Could it be the wrong screws for those links?
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 8001C115-3E32-4AA8-9B9B-FC423EA785FE.jpeg (264.3 KB, 388 views)
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 10:42 PM   #4
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
I tend to look at the watch as a whole and that includes the bracelet. Obviously the screws being tight is important but when talking about the aesthetics of a £6300 rolex thats barely a year old and with such a high end finish these imperfections bother me. Why wouldn't they supply screws that uphold the look of a factory finish?

Is the only real option now to have the links replaced for new? I hoping someone with some experience can advise whats best to do
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 11:05 PM   #5
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Apparently the watchmaker said the screws were correct and rolex supply them slightly shorter as not to sit proud as all the original links are individually finished in the factory. I dont know enough about the situation to challange that response but I would like to know more and if thats correct?
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2020, 11:19 PM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli.986 View Post
I tend to look at the watch as a whole and that includes the bracelet. Obviously the screws being tight is important but when talking about the aesthetics of a £6300 rolex thats barely a year old and with such a high end finish these imperfections bother me. Why wouldn't they supply screws that uphold the look of a factory finish?

Is the only real option now to have the links replaced for new? I hoping someone with some experience can advise whats best to do
I cannot see why you call it a imperfection a imperfection would be something wrong with the function of your watch.And even if you did replace the links that would be very expensive and for what perhaps a few screws sitting a mm or so higher in the bracelet. Why were the screws replaced were they damaged by yourself or by the watchmaker.Perhaps there are screws a tiny fraction longer but even then they might protrude so have to be polished down, not worth the hassle as it does not stop the function of the bracelet or the watch.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 12:14 AM   #7
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Clearly the word imperfection is subjective, but in my opinion it applys to the aesthetics of a peice as well as the functionalty. You may not be botherd by these small issues but unfortunaly for me I am. It was myself that damaged the original screw heads and I really thought they could be replaced and finished like new.
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 12:39 AM   #8
kauffee
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
Oli your AD is correct. Replacement screws are slightly shorter and do not sit flush with the links as the originals did. The explanation is consistent with what I’ve read on this forum as well - the originals screws are polished with the bracelet during assembly so that the finish is perfect. As to whether that look could be replicated after the fact, I’m not sure. Perhaps Bas could chime in.
kauffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 12:57 AM   #9
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,473
I would imagine that if the bracelet was refinished with the new screws in place, any obvious differences would be minimized.

As mentioned, the mirror finish on the sides of the bracelet is done after it is fully assembled. If you want that done to yours, give the bracelet specialists at Rolliworks in the US a call/text. There may also be a similar shop in your area.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 01:04 AM   #10
jburson250
"TRF" Member
 
jburson250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE NH
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 388
IMO, "imperfections" can be cosmetic, as well as functional.

It appears the OP's concern is cosmetic, i.e. threaded ends too short.

For comparison, I'd like to contribute a couple photos of my BLRO Jubilee. I bought the watch new from my local AD in April, 2019.

Several links were removed to size the bracelet for my scrawny wrist, but the screws are the original ones it was manufactured with. I don't own a DJ, though I'd expect the screw-ends to look the same - pretty much flush with the links.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2029.JPG (267.1 KB, 300 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2031.JPG (220.2 KB, 306 views)
__________________
Jim

Explorer 214270.
Sea-Dweller 126600.
Sea-Dweller Deepsea 126660 Black.
Submariner 5512.
PAM 514 Radiomir 1940.
Railmaster XXL 2806.52.37.
Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.01.001.
RIP JJ
jburson250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 01:16 AM   #11
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
I completely understand why you'd think I'm mad for being bothered by something so seemingly insignificant, but for me I bought the watch new and it is a thing of beauty and perfection. Obviously over time the piece will acquire wear and tear through use but thats different. I just wanted to rectify damage caused by myself.
This may sound stupid but I'd say a Rolex is more than just a wristwatch
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 01:43 AM   #12
jburson250
"TRF" Member
 
jburson250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE NH
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli.986 View Post
I completely understand why you'd think I'm mad for being bothered by something so seemingly insignificant, but for me I bought the watch new and it is a thing of beauty and perfection. Obviously over time the piece will acquire wear and tear through use but thats different. I just wanted to rectify damage caused by myself.
This may sound stupid but I'd say a Rolex is more than just a wristwatch
You're neither mad, nor is the issue insignificant. Hope you're able to get it sorted out.

Best Regards,
__________________
Jim

Explorer 214270.
Sea-Dweller 126600.
Sea-Dweller Deepsea 126660 Black.
Submariner 5512.
PAM 514 Radiomir 1940.
Railmaster XXL 2806.52.37.
Speedmaster Moonphase 304.33.44.52.01.001.
RIP JJ
jburson250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 02:26 AM   #13
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Thanks Jim, after whats come to light about the original factory fit and finish I'm begging to think I'll just ask for the original screws replaced and leave it for Rolex service centre to sort out at some point in the future
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 03:07 AM   #14
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli.986 View Post
I completely understand why you'd think I'm mad for being bothered by something so seemingly insignificant, but for me I bought the watch new and it is a thing of beauty and perfection. Obviously over time the piece will acquire wear and tear through use but thats different. I just wanted to rectify damage caused by myself.
This may sound stupid but I'd say a Rolex is more than just a wristwatch

I understand your perspective. I messed up a screw on my Datejust, then when I tightened it, the screw cut into the link a little bit

So, I went out and bought a new link, which cane with a screw, for $95 USD

The screw on the new link does shit flush like the rest of the screws on the bracelet sit.

I just don’t know the answer to your question. About whether or not replacement screws should fit flush.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 03:07 AM   #15
schoolboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Jesus
Location: Texas
Watch: 116234
Posts: 8,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by jburson250 View Post
You're neither mad, nor is the issue insignificant. Hope you're able to get it sorted out.

Best Regards,

Amen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
schoolboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 05:06 AM   #16
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Yeah its strange, maybe not even Rolex consider it to be an issue. Or perhaps they just want you to have to buy a new link for that seamless finish
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2020, 09:14 AM   #17
noshame
"TRF" Member
 
noshame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,649
OP, welcome to TRF. From personal experience, I can confirm 100% that genuine Rolex replacement bracelet screws are just a hair shorter than the factory ones that came originally on your watch. When installed, the replacement screw will sit a tad below the side of the link, just like yours do in the picture. Of course I would want it to sit flush like factory, however; I would rather have the slightly shorter replacement with a clean, undamaged screw head, than a factory one with a mangled screw head (which is the reason I replaced mine). I think Rolex purposely makes them a tad shorter because if they sat slightly proud, you could both see and feel it, which is worse, imo. Hope this answers your question. Like others have mentioned, I think the only way to get that perfect factory flushness back is to either order replacement links (although I don't have personal experience with this), or bring your watch to a trusted jeweler to polish the sides of the link with the replacement screws in it, which I would rather not do. Good luck.
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 03:48 AM   #18
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Thank you all for clarification much appreciated
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 04:05 AM   #19
Sprezzatura!,
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oli.986 View Post
Thank you all for clarification much appreciated
Where are you you located in the UK?
Sprezzatura!, is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 05:25 AM   #20
Oli.986
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprezzatura!, View Post
Where are you you located in the UK?
Hi I'm based just outside London
Oli.986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 06:15 AM   #21
Sprezzatura!,
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by jburson250 View Post
IMO, "imperfections" can be cosmetic, as well as functional.

It appears the OP's concern is cosmetic, i.e. threaded ends too short.

For comparison, I'd like to contribute a couple photos of my BLRO Jubilee. I bought the watch new from my local AD in April, 2019.

Several links were removed to size the bracelet for my scrawny wrist, but the screws are the original ones it was manufactured with. I don't own a DJ, though I'd expect the screw-ends to look the same - pretty much flush with the links.
Yes but if you look at your pictures, the second of the two images, the screw closest to the clasp sits lower than the others?

I’m confused now. Does this mean it’s a replacement screw added by the AD, or can the original screw sit just a tiny bit differently when removed and then screwed in again during link removal?!
Sprezzatura!, is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 07:05 AM   #22
noshame
"TRF" Member
 
noshame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprezzatura!, View Post
Yes but if you look at your pictures, the second of the two images, the screw closest to the clasp sits lower than the others?

I’m confused now. Does this mean it’s a replacement screw added by the AD, or can the original screw sit just a tiny bit differently when removed and then screwed in again during link removal?!
Good eye on spotting that! That particular screw you are talking about, the one closest to the little folding clasp with the crown, is different than all the others. It does not go all the way through to the other side of the link ... meaning it stops somewhere inside the link and the thread end is not visually seen. It is the only factory screw that sits slightly lower than flush on the screw head side. All the other factory ones will be flush. I have compared it to my own watch and it is the same. The screw in the picture is factory. Hope that makes sense.

And for visual reference, since that's a great photo supplied by jburson250, replacement screws will sit slightly below flush, almost exactly like how that particular "special" screw by the folding clasp with the crown sits in the photo.
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 07:18 AM   #23
Sprezzatura!,
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
Jubilee bracelet link screw issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by noshame View Post
Good eye on spotting that! That particular screw you are talking about, the one closest to the little folding clasp with the crown, is different than all the others. It does not go all the way through to the other side of the link ... meaning it stops somewhere inside the link and the thread end is not visually seen. It is the only factory screw that sits slightly lower than flush on the screw head side. All the other factory ones will be flush. I have compared it to my own watch and it is the same. The screw in the picture is factory. Hope that makes sense.

And for visual reference, since that's a great photo supplied by jburson250, replacement screws will sit slightly below flush, almost exactly like how that particular "special" screw by the folding clasp with the crown sits in the photo.

Yes makes sense, thank you.

I actually just made another thread on this.

It’s the same on my oyster - the only screw to not sit flush - is just a hair lower and is on the same little link that connects to the bracelet but doesn’t go all the way through like the others - as you say, it stops somewhere inside without a thread end in sight on the opposite side.

You have to really study it and hold the camera in the right place to even pick it up.

Sprezzatura!, is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 07:41 AM   #24
noshame
"TRF" Member
 
noshame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprezzatura!, View Post
Yes makes sense, thank you.

I actually just made another thread on this.

It’s the same on my oyster - the only screw to not sit flush - is just a hair lower and is on the same little link that connects to the bracelet but doesn’t go all the way through like the others - as you say, it stops somewhere inside without a thread end in sight on the opposite side.

You have to really study it and hold the camera in the right place to even pick it up.

I actually feel really great right now as you're the first fellow member I've helped troubleshoot something. I'm slightly OCD about things like this, that's the only way most people will ever even notice. Trust me, it's not a good thing!
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2020, 08:37 AM   #25
Sprezzatura!,
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by noshame View Post
I actually feel really great right now as you're the first fellow member I've helped troubleshoot something. I'm slightly OCD about things like this, that's the only way most people will ever even notice. Trust me, it's not a good thing!

Hahaha I’m glad you’re feeling good about this, and thank you.
Sprezzatura!, is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.