![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 345
|
Why isn't the GMT hand in the Explorer 2 behind the hour hand?
I have been reading a lot about the new Explorer II 226570, thanks to this model's increase popularity and attention recently.
There is a design decision, however, that baffles me: Since maximising legibility is THE key design premise for this model, why assemble the GMT "freccione" on top of the regular hour hand? Since the stem of the freccione is rather wide (compared to the regular GMT hand on the GMT-Master2) and not luminescent, it can easily obscure the regular hour hand, I suppose. Wouldn't it make more sense to assemble it at the bottom of the train, so that the shorter hour hand is always visible on top of the GMT hand? The tip of the orange freccione would always be visible underneath, since it is longer, right? I realise caliber 3285 on the GMT-Master has the same arrangement of the watch hands, however this is less of an issue on that model due to the different design of the GMT hand. There must be a reason that escapes me... I turn to you, oh wise WIS, for enlightenment! ![]() Thanks in advance! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Up North, UK
Posts: 108
|
Really, if you are using the 'gmt' hand for its intended use, you would use it over the standard hour hand. It wasn't meant to indicate a different time zone but to distinguish am from pm.
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
The GMT hand is second so it can be above the Hour markers. The Minute and Seconds above that. If the GMT were below, the entire stack would have to start ABOVE the hour markers or be short of the hour markers. In essence it saves about 1mm of overall thickness to do it the way Rolex does vs the ETA 2893 movements with their GMT/H/M/S stack. Actually the OLD 1675 Rolex used the GMT/H/M/S stack... ![]() But that was with Printed dials and no Applied Markers.... You can see the stack change with the 16750 series ![]() The design baffles you because you have never assembled or designed a watch.....
__________________
IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,404
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Next time, I'll stick to enquiring about appreciation potential, value retention, advantageous trades, and the likes... ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,378
|
To drive OCDs crazy of course!!!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 75,951
|
I love threads like these as it brings to light something I never would’ve noticed and folks chime in with plausible answers
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,385
|
Hmmmm, interesting
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,409
|
Quote:
The thread a few years back about the counterweight on the seconds hand perfectly covering the "o" in Rolex still blows my mind to this day. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 75,951
|
Quote:
![]() There are so many subtle nuances to be learned here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Chris
Location: Florida USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 716
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Up North, UK
Posts: 108
|
Shamelessly stolen from an article
Introduced as a watch for spelunkers, the Explorer II design is function over form. The darkness in some of these caves makes it impossible to tell whether it is day or night, which is the reason for the 24-hour hand and fixed bezel. While the original Explorer II Ref. 1655 was not at all meant to be a travel watch, the 16570 introduced an independent hour hand that functionally made the watch a dual time zone travel watch. The original version has a fixed 24 hour bezel (retained) but it also fixed the 'GMT' hand to track the hour hand. So if the hour hand was at 6 and it was PM, the 'GMT' hand would sit at 18. Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,280
|
Quote:
Haha..you got me. ![]() I'd forgotten about this. I looked down and had to wait almost 57 seconds to check it out! I think I'm suffering with tertiary OcD. ![]() Just off to check it again (28 second wait!) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,409
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,510
|
I love these type TRF threads. Mechanical watches and their constructed design are what brought me to the hobby over 25 years ago.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 345
|
![]() ![]() Thanks again for the explanation. Truly appreciated, as I am always keen to learn more about the history and technicalities of mechanical watches in general, and Rolex in particular. I personally enjoy this kind of threads much more than those around what is the correct price to pay for such watches or their future value. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,431
|
Very interesting. Learned something new today.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,409
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glasgow UK
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
|
I spent quite a lot of time staring at my 16570...
Here's a Good photo of my old one illustrating the stacking. ![]() Here's a photo of how Monta dealt with the stacking on a standard ETA 2893 movement to avoid adding dial to crystal depth... ![]()
__________________
IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 761
|
Glad to learn.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,409
|
Quote:
Looks like my Tudor GMT is set up the same way with the hour hand at the bottom of the stack. No I understand why ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
|
Quote:
“I got a few drops of olive oil on my Rolex, should I send it to the RSC for pressure test” “Should I try for a 116595RBOW Rainbow Daytona for list price or a two-tone ladies Datejust at a discount? Which is likely to ______/go up the most as a percentage of value/cause my AD to want to offer me a a Sub Date fastest/look best with my new custom home made clothing line I’m launching next fall?” Funnier is that those questions would draw passionate responses on both sides! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 338
|
Why isn't the GMT hand in the Explorer 2 behind the hour hand?
I never even noticed what way the hands were stacked until this thread.
Interesting to hear the reason given; makes perfect sense. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
Thanks for the interesting topic !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
“The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind” Rolex "some" Tudor "some" Damasko "some" Misc Pieces "some" Marathon "some" GS Spring Drive "some" Hamilton "some" Findeisen "some" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 345
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NYC
Watch: Skydweller
Posts: 39
|
I noticed the same thing on the Tudor GMT glad I’m not the only crazy one who picked up on this!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.