ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TimeToGo · 3 June 2009, 08:24 AM

cox7554( 134)

http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-GM...3A1%7C294%3A50

GMTJOHNNY · 3 June 2009, 10:44 AM

Not sure. No SWISS MADE (or any markings like that) at the "6" position, hands look new. Second hand looks too short. Better get one of the pros in here to verify.

idk01 · 3 June 2009, 10:47 AM

Hmmmm vintage, don't know about that, this aint right, second hand look short and wheres the "SWISS T>25" ???? unless its a service dial?

idk01 · 3 June 2009, 10:48 AM

Hahahha great minds John!!!!

onkyo · 3 June 2009, 10:55 AM

Crown looks funny????

Ed Rooney · 3 June 2009, 11:05 AM

I think i've seen this one floating around before. It is a poor repaint job on the dial.

onkyo · 3 June 2009, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ed Rooney

I think i've seen this one floating around before. It is a poor repaint job on the dial.

Yeah, everything on the dial looks funny.

watchdawg · 3 June 2009, 12:05 PM

The dial isn't right and something also isn't right with the bezel. On the second picture even thou the top arrow isn't lined up the twelve is on the bottom. It looks as if its centered when the top is off set. Might be my eyes but this is the second bezel like this that I've seen and the last was on a fake.

jdrolltide3838 · 3 June 2009, 12:12 PM

About the only thing that does look right is the date

Rebel · 3 June 2009, 12:58 PM

How is the battery?

springer · 3 June 2009, 01:30 PM

The dial appears to be a poor quality redial. The band and clasp appear genuine, but the end links are incorrect. It's hard to make a call on this one.

The wrong end links and a redial doesn't preclude it from being genuine.

TimeToGo · 9 June 2009, 07:25 AM

It's baaack!

http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-GM...3%3A1|294%3A50

watchdawg · 9 June 2009, 10:44 AM

Interesting the picture of where the serial number should be looks as if it was brushed off and nothing can be seen. I know that on old watches the number can be rubbed off but this appears to be uniformed brushing. If you look at the picture of the model number there is very little rubbing on the number. This causes me to wonder if this watch just might be stolen. Very odd.

3 June 2009, 10:44 AM	#2
GMTJOHNNY "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: LONG ISLAND, NY Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT Posts: 1,378	Not sure. No SWISS MADE (or any markings like that) at the "6" position, hands look new. Second hand looks too short. Better get one of the pros in here to verify. __________________ ROLEX DAY DATE 118238 (2007) ROLEX DAY DATE 18238 (1997) ROLEX GMT 16750 PEPSI (1987) ROLEX AIR KING 14000 (1991) ROLEX GMTIIC TT 116713LN (2008)

3 June 2009, 10:47 AM	#3
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Hmmmm vintage, don't know about that, this aint right, second hand look short and wheres the "SWISS T>25" ???? unless its a service dial? __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

3 June 2009, 10:48 AM	#4
idk01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Dave Location: Australia Watch: DJ16233TT Posts: 18,485	Hahahha great minds John!!!! __________________ *Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth*

3 June 2009, 12:58 PM	#10
Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail Location: New Albany Watch: Tudor Sub 75090 Posts: 8,166	How is the battery? __________________ ------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation

3 June 2009, 01:30 PM	#11
springer 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,235	The dial appears to be a poor quality redial. The band and clasp appear genuine, but the end links are incorrect. It's hard to make a call on this one. The wrong end links and a redial doesn't preclude it from being genuine. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

3 June 2009, 10:55 AM	#5
onkyo Banned Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Pav Location: Manhattan Posts: 11,495	Crown looks funny????

3 June 2009, 11:05 AM	#6
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	I think i've seen this one floating around before. It is a poor repaint job on the dial.

3 June 2009, 12:05 PM	#8
watchdawg "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Vic Location: Colorado/UAE Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 492	The dial isn't right and something also isn't right with the bezel. On the second picture even thou the top arrow isn't lined up the twelve is on the bottom. It looks as if its centered when the top is off set. Might be my eyes but this is the second bezel like this that I've seen and the last was on a fake.

3 June 2009, 12:12 PM	#9
jdrolltide3838 Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: J.D. Location: Roll Tide, AL Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 695	About the only thing that does look right is the date

9 June 2009, 07:25 AM	#12
TimeToGo 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,691	It's baaack! http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-Rolex-GM...3%3A1\|294%3A50

9 June 2009, 10:44 AM	#13
watchdawg "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: Vic Location: Colorado/UAE Watch: GMT 1675 Posts: 492	Interesting the picture of where the serial number should be looks as if it was brushed off and nothing can be seen. I know that on old watches the number can be rubbed off but this appears to be uniformed brushing. If you look at the picture of the model number there is very little rubbing on the number. This causes me to wonder if this watch just might be stolen. Very odd.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)