![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,691
|
HOW Vintage is this GMT?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: LONG ISLAND, NY
Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT
Posts: 1,378
|
Not sure. No SWISS MADE (or any markings like that) at the "6" position, hands look new. Second hand looks too short. Better get one of the pros in here to verify.
__________________
ROLEX DAY DATE 118238 (2007) ROLEX DAY DATE 18238 (1997) ROLEX GMT 16750 PEPSI (1987) ROLEX AIR KING 14000 (1991) ROLEX GMTIIC TT 116713LN (2008) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Hmmmm vintage, don't know about that, this aint right, second hand look short and wheres the "SWISS T>25" ???? unless its a service dial?
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
Hahahha great minds John!!!!
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Crown looks funny????
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
I think i've seen this one floating around before. It is a poor repaint job on the dial.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado/UAE
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 492
|
The dial isn't right and something also isn't right with the bezel. On the second picture even thou the top arrow isn't lined up the twelve is on the bottom. It looks as if its centered when the top is off set. Might be my eyes but this is the second bezel like this that I've seen and the last was on a fake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: J.D.
Location: Roll Tide, AL
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 695
|
About the only thing that does look right is the date
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,166
|
How is the battery?
__________________
------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,235
|
The dial appears to be a poor quality redial. The band and clasp appear genuine, but the end links are incorrect. It's hard to make a call on this one.
The wrong end links and a redial doesn't preclude it from being genuine.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,691
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado/UAE
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 492
|
Interesting the picture of where the serial number should be looks as if it was brushed off and nothing can be seen. I know that on old watches the number can be rubbed off but this appears to be uniformed brushing. If you look at the picture of the model number there is very little rubbing on the number. This causes me to wonder if this watch just might be stolen. Very odd.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.