ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 June 2009, 03:34 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
Two to kill?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ROLEX-OYSTER-PER...3%3A2|294%3A50
Seller: deenakhan(427) The band/lug fit is worrying me, as is the blurriness of the Rolex name. http://cgi.ebay.com/New-SS-Stainless...3%3A3|294%3A50 Seller: ez_wireless(273) The crown is so large, I can't see it being legit. |
3 June 2009, 03:42 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
They both look okay to me... But I'm no expert. The crown on the Sub looks big in certain pictures, but I went and looked at mine and at certain angles it did match what was in those pictures.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB |
3 June 2009, 03:49 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
I may be wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.
|
3 June 2009, 04:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
On the first one that band doesn't look right, we need Stan on this one :-) the sub looks all OK.
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
3 June 2009, 06:56 PM | #5 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,695
|
Band looks good on the first one.
|
3 June 2009, 11:45 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
3 June 2009, 11:50 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
...BOTH watches are OKAY...
...the only thing is the obvious refi of the vintage dial-PINK?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.