The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 October 2021, 05:45 AM   #1
m j b
"TRF" Member
 
m j b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,200
Thinking of buying a Submariner

I got rid of my 114060 because it was kind of large and bulky looking on my svelte waif-like wrists. But nothing I've gotten since then, be it Omega, Tudor, and some not-quite-micro brands have done it for me, either in comfort or looks.

All I've got now is my Tudor BB58 in blue, on a bracelet, which is great and fits me well. But the bracelet isn't quite at Oyster level, and I'm not crazy about straps.

I keep coming back to the roughly $5K delta between the Rolex and Tudor, and it just seems kind of silly to pay all of that money.

Yeah, I know, several years ago I had multiple Rolexes including PM, and it didn't bother me. Am I getting older?

Thoughts, opinions, comments?
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date.


Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...
m j b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 05:47 AM   #2
doboy007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SD, CA
Watch: BLNR/LVc/SkyD/ND41
Posts: 2,519
New 124060 wears even bigger so worse than 114060.
doboy007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 05:53 AM   #3
Seddyspaghetti
"TRF" Member
 
Seddyspaghetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,789
Get another sub. Yolo!
Seddyspaghetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 05:56 AM   #4
RoRoRo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: U.K.
Watch: YM40
Posts: 844
YM40 is your friend.
RoRoRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:14 AM   #5
robinmgb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by doboy007 View Post
New 124060 wears even bigger so worse than 114060.
I found the 124060 wore slightly smaller than the 114060 when I tried them side by side today.
I know the case has increased by 1mm but with the slimmer lugs the 41mm model appeared smaller to my eyes!
robinmgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:20 AM   #6
AdamW
"TRF" Member
 
AdamW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Adam
Location: In my head
Watch: this space
Posts: 796
Just picked up a new 41mm Sub Date this weekend. Wears NOTHING like my prior 6 digit. I had a bluesy that I sold because it was just to heavy for me and the super case was just too much. This one sits better, is better balanced and just is so much more comfortable. Also, as much as I've tried with Omega, I still come back to nothing feels like a Rolex!
__________________
Adam

" I don't have a microwave oven but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks $h!t" - Mitch Hedburgh
AdamW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:26 AM   #7
Mendota
"TRF" Member
 
Mendota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MN
Watch: OP36 Blue 3-6-9
Posts: 2,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
Just picked up a new 41mm Sub Date this weekend. Wears NOTHING like my prior 6 digit. I had a bluesy that I sold because it was just to heavy for me and the super case was just too much. This one sits better, is better balanced and just is so much more comfortable. Also, as much as I've tried with Omega, I still come back to nothing feels like a Rolex!
I can't wait to get my call. The last time I was in at my AD he handed me his own 116610 to try on while we were talking and looking at vintage pieces and I loved it. He said from the limited 12 series ones they have received since it was released, it's even better and if I liked his 11, I would love the 12 series!
Mendota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:30 AM   #8
AdamW
"TRF" Member
 
AdamW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Adam
Location: In my head
Watch: this space
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mendota View Post
I can't wait to get my call. The last time I was in at my AD he handed me his own 116610 to try on while we were talking and looking at vintage pieces and I loved it. He said from the limited 12 series ones they have received since it was released, it's even better and if I liked his 11, I would love the 12 series!
The difference between the 11 and 12 is substantial I think. Good luck! You'll be happy when you get it I promise.
__________________
Adam

" I don't have a microwave oven but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks $h!t" - Mitch Hedburgh
AdamW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:36 AM   #9
doboy007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SD, CA
Watch: BLNR/LVc/SkyD/ND41
Posts: 2,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinmgb View Post
I found the 124060 wore slightly smaller than the 114060 when I tried them side by side today.
I know the case has increased by 1mm but with the slimmer lugs the 41mm model appeared smaller to my eyes!
For me, it wears bigger than my Hulk. Enough to irritate me a bit.
doboy007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:44 AM   #10
aayates
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 913
Disagree

Quote:
Originally Posted by doboy007 View Post
New 124060 wears even bigger so worse than 114060.
I've had both and the 41mm fits better on a "not so large wrist" due to the lugs being thinner.
aayates is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:50 AM   #11
greenlight77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Posts: 14
I’d suggest getting an older 4/5 digit sub that’s in “used” condition both to keep the cost down and allow you to wear it without being scared of devaluing due to condition.
They tend to work better on smaller wrists and even though the premium over the Tudor will still be there over the long term value should hold/appreciate more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
greenlight77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 06:52 AM   #12
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,659
16610 is what you need it sounds like……great watch
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 08:06 AM   #13
Soarer
"TRF" Member
 
Soarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Albert
Location: Toronto
Watch: Submariner LV
Posts: 1,083
Why force yourself? Tudor BB58 is the best for smaller wrist and you already have the Blue so rejoice and order the Black! Or you can look at the 5-digit Sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
What you gotta do, you gotta do!
Soarer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 08:23 AM   #14
asiparks
"TRF" Member
 
asiparks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b

I keep coming back to the roughly $5K delta between the Rolex and Tudor, and it just seems kind of silly to pay all of that money.

Thoughts, opinions, comments?
The blue BB58 is a very handsome watch, it does everything the Sub does in a slightly more under the radar, I'd argue cooler, way.

The extra $5k buys you, perhaps, a marginally better watch with a slightly nicer bracelet and more "flex" as the kids would say, but that's also almost another whole other luxury watch by itself.
__________________
Eagels may soar, but weasels are seldom sucked into jet engines...
asiparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 08:28 AM   #15
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,651
5 digit sub is going to fit the best, especially if you thought the 40mm 114060 was too big. I have the BB58 and it wears much much smaller than the new sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 08:34 AM   #16
jerseydan31
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 100
40mm Ceramic Sub is your friend (or in this case it was). Tudor BB58 checks all of the boxes you are looking for...but it does not say the world 'Rolex' on the dial (which is a stigma for many). The BB58 is a great watch for those whom already have a sub (can treat it as your grab n go piece). 5 digit sub is also a great option but harder to flip in case you fall out of love with it. Just my 2 pennies.

Have owned the 11610LN, BB58 and the 16800.....40mm Sub is far down best compromise if you want something that exudes Rolex quality. But 'apples to apples' BB58 hands down blows the no-date sub out of the water for sure.
jerseydan31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:06 AM   #17
dnuggett
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: TX
Posts: 100
The Sub 41 is the best daily wear watch made today.. IMO. I also have 7.5" wrists, so I see why you may struggle with it. I'd suggest looking at the 39mm Explorer that has been disco'd.
dnuggett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:20 AM   #18
m j b
"TRF" Member
 
m j b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,200
Thanks guys!
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date.


Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...
m j b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:24 AM   #19
lmarques16
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Sao Paulo
Posts: 7
More than happy with my 41 sub and I have a 6” wrist. Go for it !
lmarques16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:21 PM   #20
Scaramanga74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sweden
Watch: 124060
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
Thanks guys!
I had a 16610 which was great. Traded it for a 124060 and hasn´t looked back. The new case is just brilliant and sits really nice.
Scaramanga74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:35 PM   #21
Driver8
"TRF" Member
 
Driver8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by doboy007 View Post
New 124060 wears even bigger so worse than 114060.
Personally I find it the exact opposite. Despite it's "point something of a mm" increase in size, the lug shape makes the 124060 wear smaller IMO.
Driver8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 09:47 PM   #22
Benzsiam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Benzsiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,000
If you preferred smaller size, go for Explorer I.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D.
AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996"
Benzsiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 10:41 PM   #23
liberalclown
"TRF" Member
 
liberalclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Jan
Location: Earth
Posts: 381
12 series are only 0.3mm larger in diameter but thinner lugs and thinner height make a huge difference in wearability. Try it on a grey or an AD with exhibition only models, you will like it.
liberalclown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2021, 11:14 PM   #24
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 1,913
I too bought, fell in love with and quickly fell out with a BB58 blue. I know its against popular opinion on here but the watch is good, just not Submariner good.
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 12:27 AM   #25
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
Go for a 16610. You won’t regret it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 12:31 AM   #26
WatchNutcase
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinmgb View Post
I found the 124060 wore slightly smaller than the 114060 when I tried them side by side today.
I know the case has increased by 1mm but with the slimmer lugs the 41mm model appeared smaller to my eyes!
I find the 124060 to wear larger with the roomier dial, longer lugs, and wider bracelet / clasp.
WatchNutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 12:31 AM   #27
WatchNutcase
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by doboy007 View Post
New 124060 wears even bigger so worse than 114060.
+1 same experience here
WatchNutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 12:33 AM   #28
WatchNutcase
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by m j b View Post
I got rid of my 114060 because it was kind of large and bulky looking on my svelte waif-like wrists. But nothing I've gotten since then, be it Omega, Tudor, and some not-quite-micro brands have done it for me, either in comfort or looks.

All I've got now is my Tudor BB58 in blue, on a bracelet, which is great and fits me well. But the bracelet isn't quite at Oyster level, and I'm not crazy about straps.

I keep coming back to the roughly $5K delta between the Rolex and Tudor, and it just seems kind of silly to pay all of that money.

Yeah, I know, several years ago I had multiple Rolexes including PM, and it didn't bother me. Am I getting older?

Thoughts, opinions, comments?
What size wrist do you have?

I have the 114060 with relatively small wrists at 6.5 inches, but flat wrists. Love the 114060 and find it fits well, but definitely couldn't go larger than this.

It can feel slightly chunky at times but this is a dive watch, and I find the visual proportions look great and it's not large looking. It's difficult to find a slim and lightweight wearing dive watch because that's not what they're designed to be, if that's the look you're after maybe something on the dressier side would work. Maybe even a chrono but those tend to also be thicker because of the movement and with larger dials for timing things with good legibility.

Also the moderns Subs are some of the slimmest modern dive watches on the market, check out Omega and GS both with thicker offerings. The only way to find something smaller is to go vintage or to buy a vintage reissue from a brand like Oris for example.
WatchNutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 12:42 AM   #29
rmagoo57
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1665fan View Post
16610 is what you need it sounds like……great watch
Agree. Or the 14060M which is slightly smaller.

I would also consider the 16570 Exp II, black dial. All are great watches!
rmagoo57 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2021, 01:10 AM   #30
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 464
IMG_0020.JPG
Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.