![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
226570 AR crystal vs 216570 crystal (non AR)
I am thinking of trying to pick up a grey EXPII, but the lack of AR coating on the 216570 makes me lean towards the newer model (the lack of AR on my 116710 makes it practically unreadable in some lights).
Can anyone please share any photos of the 216570 and the 226570 outside that show how bad/good the old polar is compared to the new one?
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,282
|
Quote:
I traded my grey xii 21 for a brand new AD xii 22. But nothing to do with the AR. Better bracelet proportions. Movement. And now I’m glad to here about the AR! Here’s sun pictures of both (I’ve never noticed a difference) ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 260
|
A twist of the arm with 21:
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 345
|
Here goes a photo of a 226570 (polar dial, left) next to a 216570 (black dial, right)
Notice the back dial appears somewhat "hazy" while the white dial "pops", under the same lighting conditions. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,810
|
I think you're overthinking it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I was thinking of picking up a 216570 to avoid the 32** movement issue, but the lack of AR coating is a big problem for me. That 226570 is far clearer.
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
226570 AR crystal vs 216570 crystal (non AR)
I find the glare quite distracting. Most of my watches recently have been either domed or an AR coating — I am finding the lack of it on my 116710 to be very irritating. ![]()
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
These are epic photos! Thanks for sharing! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,964
|
226570 AR crystal vs 216570 crystal (non AR)
Just the AR addition seems to be enough improvement to make the upgrade. Wonder if someone had fitted, if it’s compatible, the newer AR sapphire of the 226570 on the older 216570 model
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I concur. In terms of actually using the watch daily, the AR coating is very important. The question is whether or not it’s worth the potential 32** movement drama. I suspect the latter will be resolved at some stage by Rolex, but that’ll never fix the lack of the former on the 216570. I saw my pal the other day, he has the new 41mm sub, and it was significantly more legible than my 116710. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 512
|
I just had my 2019 SD43 crystal swapped out for an AR coated new one at my AD. $160. Call RSC Dallas and see if an AR coated version is available for your reference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
226570 AR crystal vs 216570 crystal (non AR)
Quote:
That’s excellent news. I suspect it is, give my that the new GMTs are coming with them now as stock. Congrats on you’re non milky SD! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Dave
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 126600
Posts: 580
|
So the new SD43s have the AR coated? I hadn't heard of that! I believe you, but Are there any official references on this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: down the drain
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,010
|
226570 AR crystal vs 216570 crystal (non AR)
I own for a few months a black face EXII 22-serie which I have bought BNIB.
It is really a fantastic watch with the AR and bracelet update! Only thing is that I am somewhat uncertain about is the future development of the movement…. How it stands on longer term…. It runs now after a few month wearing -5 seconds per day. Totally ok for me. For now very happy! ![]()
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 Breitling Avenger A17318 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 512
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
216570 , 226570 , ar coating |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.