The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 June 2024, 05:12 AM   #1
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
126500 Daytona vs GMT II comfort

Hello guys,

For the ones that own a modern steel Daytona(126500ln) and a steel GMT II 126710 model, how does the comfort compare?. Is one a lot more comfortable than the other?. I’m sure someone here owns both. Thanks in advance!
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:16 AM   #2
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 706
I have experience with the 11 digit versions both on oyster and find that they wear very similar comfort wise.

If you got the GMT on a jubilee bracelet I would expect that to tip the comfort factor in the direction of the GMT.

For what it’s worth I have a smallish 6.25” wrist.

Quite different looking watches. Which do you prefer the look of OP?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:19 AM   #3
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikincooper View Post
I have experience with the 11 digit versions both on oyster and find that they wear very similar comfort wise.

If you got the GMT on a jubilee bracelet I would expect that to tip the comfort factor in the direction of the GMT.

For what it’s worth I have a smallish 6.25” wrist.

Quite different looking watches. Which do you prefer the look of OP?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think both look beautiful!. I appreciate the simplicity and clean looks of the GMTI but I also love chronographs!. I already have a Sprite on a jubilee and thinking about adding a Daytona soon.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:21 AM   #4
Bazil
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bazil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Real Name: Bazil Brush
Location: Star Gazing
Watch: Any Daytona
Posts: 2,384
For a smaller wrist I’d go for Daytona … both fit great, 40mm, and as mentioned Jubilee is very comfortable bracelet ..
__________________
<a href=https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z target=_blank>https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z</a>
One day, it just stops ticking, so enjoy every second
If you have no enemies, you have no character. Taking a stand always creates opposition.
Paul Newman
Bazil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:25 AM   #5
Bazil
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bazil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Real Name: Bazil Brush
Location: Star Gazing
Watch: Any Daytona
Posts: 2,384


__________________
<a href=https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z target=_blank>https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z</a>
One day, it just stops ticking, so enjoy every second
If you have no enemies, you have no character. Taking a stand always creates opposition.
Paul Newman
Bazil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:26 AM   #6
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazil View Post


Beautiful collection you got there. I have a 7.75 inch wrist and from what I’m reading, the new Daytona reference is a true 40mm whereas the 116500 was a 38.5mm.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:28 AM   #7
Bazil
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bazil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Real Name: Bazil Brush
Location: Star Gazing
Watch: Any Daytona
Posts: 2,384
GMT fits bit bigger than my 116500 did ..
__________________
<a href=https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z target=_blank>https://ibb.co/P5C6k8z</a>
One day, it just stops ticking, so enjoy every second
If you have no enemies, you have no character. Taking a stand always creates opposition.
Paul Newman
Bazil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:30 AM   #8
ikincooper
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazil View Post
GMT fits bit bigger than my 116500 did ..

Agree


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ikincooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:33 AM   #9
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,973
11 Series Daytona is a bit more comfortable to me over the GMT/jubilee because the Daytona case is more organic, flatter case back, thinner. That’s not to say the GMT is uncomfortable and much more comfortable than a SS Sub. I feel both Daytona and GMT is as perfect a pair as it gets because of what both bring.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:38 AM   #10
Neil McCauley
"TRF" Member
 
Neil McCauley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 364
Both fit great, but the 126500LN is a lot more wearable and comfortable in general. I’ve been wearing my Daytona daily now for the last month or so, and whenever I put my GMT on, it feels really big in comparison.
Both watches are still very comfortable though, the Daytona pops it overall for comfort for me.
__________________
126720VTNR // 116710BLNR // 126610LN // 126500LN // 126334 // 6424
Neil McCauley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:38 AM   #11
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
11 Series Daytona is a bit more comfortable to me over the GMT/jubilee because the Daytona case is more organic, flatter case back, thinner. That’s not to say the GMT is uncomfortable and much more comfortable than a SS Sub. I feel both Daytona and GMT is as perfect a pair as it gets because of what both bring.
I agree. They make a great duo!. Reason I asked was i noticed that the Daytona has a much flatter case back. On the GMT II the part of the caseback that sits on your wrist measures 21mm. On the 116500 and 126500, it’s 28mm. The 116500 looks flatter than the 126500 but from all the pics I could find, it’s the same. I think it’s because the newer reference Daytona gained about a 1.5mm in diameter so it looks smaller.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:45 AM   #12
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
Both fit great, but the 126500LN is a lot more wearable and comfortable in general. I’ve been wearing my Daytona daily now for the last month or so, and whenever I put my GMT on, it feels really big in comparison.
Both watches are still very comfortable though, the Daytona pops it overall for comfort for me.
Great to hear from someone who owns both and specifically the Sprite. I would have guessed the Daytona was more comfortable based on pics. I travel a lot for work and I got my Sprite at a dealer in Texas but he told me it would be very hard to get a Daytona. You are one lucky guy to have both!. I could be happy forever just owing the Sprite and the Daytona!.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:48 AM   #13
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
I agree. They make a great duo!. Reason I asked was i noticed that the Daytona has a much flatter case back. On the GMT II the part of the caseback that sits on your wrist measures 21mm. On the 116500 and 126500, it’s 28mm. The 116500 looks flatter than the 126500 but from all the pics I could find, it’s the same. I think it’s because the newer reference Daytona gained about a 1.5mm in diameter so it looks smaller.
The 11 series Daytona does have a flatter case back. It is THE most comfortable Rolex I have ever wore and I have owned a lot of Rolex models over the decades. The GMT is a different animal and its looks are more comparable to a Sub. The GMT is a better choice in comfort if you are looking for the GMT/Sub chunkier sporty look. The Daytona in general is in a different league that those.

__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:56 AM   #14
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
The 11 series Daytona does have a flatter case back. It is THE most comfortable Rolex I have ever wore and I have owned a lot of Rolex models over the decades. The GMT is a different animal and its looks are more comparable to a Sub. The GMT is a better choice in comfort if you are looking for the GMT/Sub chunkier sporty look. The Daytona in general is in a different league that those.

From what I’ve seen online, they have the same exact case back flatness. If you look at the pic below, they measure exactly the same.



If you forward to 3:10, they’re the same. It just looks different. It definitely seems like a very comfortable watch and I will get one soon hopefully.

https://youtu.be/WkZ3BhywVCo
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:01 AM   #15
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
From what I’ve seen online, they have the same exact case back flatness. If you look at the pic below, they measure exactly the same.



If you forward to 3:10, they’re the same. It just looks different. It definitely seems like a very comfortable watch and I will get one soon hopefully.

https://youtu.be/WkZ3BhywVCo
It’s not the size but how different in the case back is designed. Notice the measurements of the red arrow and what part it’s pointing to in the previous pic. That brushed area is the “flat” part.
The higher the case back “hat” protrudes out, the more room is inside for the movement. The polished area is where the cased back pushes out. The brushed area is the flat side and what’s the most important as it is what distributes the weight of the watch directly to your skin.

This is very important and more obvious on a dive watch like this SD43. Its case back is why so many had a comfort issue over its bigger brother DSSD. The flatter the case back the more comfortable.

__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:04 AM   #16
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Size is different in how the case back is designed. The higher the case back “hat” protrudes out, the more room is inside for the movement.
Design is different for sure but for me knowing the part that actually sits on my wrist is the same as the previous version makes me think it will also be comfortable. From the pic you provided, it looks like the actual matte flat part is smaller but it’s not from my research. I agree with you that matte part is the important part when it comes to comfort and if you measure the matte part in both references, it’s the exact same. I think the pic you provided is not correct of both references. Hopefully soon I’ll post pics!.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 09:37 AM   #17
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,267
I have a couple of dozen, and I can't really tell a difference in "comfort" levels.

Get the watch you want for the reasons you choose. One that feels good to you might be completely different with somebody else.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 12:45 PM   #18
928ktgold
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LA
Watch: what’s next.
Posts: 1,037
126500 Daytona vs GMT II comfort

I have both and the Daytona is more comfortable. When you extend your wrist it will never dig into the watch. The GMT just slightly digs in but not really. Not like my 124060 no date sub. When you cover the watch/cup it with your other hand, the Daytona feels smoother. So moderate edge to the Daytona for comfort as a daily.


I had the 116500LN white for about 4 years and it was very comfortable. It was hard to let go due to that because of its size compared to the slightly larger 126500LN.
928ktgold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 08:22 PM   #19
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Appreciate all the input guys. Will be getting a Daytona shortly…somehow :-)
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 08:22 PM   #20
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by 928ktgold View Post
I have both and the Daytona is more comfortable. When you extend your wrist it will never dig into the watch. The GMT just slightly digs in but not really. Not like my 124060 no date sub. When you cover the watch/cup it with your other hand, the Daytona feels smoother. So moderate edge to the Daytona for comfort as a daily.


I had the 116500LN white for about 4 years and it was very comfortable. It was hard to let go due to that because of its size compared to the slightly larger 126500LN.
Very nice watches!. So you would say the 116500 and the 126500 wear just as comfortable?
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 11:24 PM   #21
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,632
I've always found the GMT to fit a little looser and the Daytona a little tighter, probably due to the respective case size of each.

But, there isn't much difference, if any, between them in terms of overall fitment. To be fair, I don't own a 12-series Daytona, so it might be different.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:21 AM   #22
1William
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 45,652
I have found that the GMT wears better for me on jubilee. I had two 11 Daytona's and think they are too small for my 7.5-7.75 inch wrist.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:35 AM   #23
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,972
Good luck OP, hope you land one soon
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:40 AM   #24
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Good luck OP, hope you land one soon
Appreciate it!!!. It’s going to happen sooner than later
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:42 AM   #25
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
Appreciate it!!!. It’s going to happen sooner than later
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:58 AM   #26
StackLexus17
"TRF" Member
 
StackLexus17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 567
The Daytona is more comfortable.
For me it's the slimmer case and lines.

The GMT is thicker and has different case lines.
This contributes to a different case to bracelet balance.

Both are great watches!
__________________
♛116500LN
StackLexus17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 01:01 AM   #27
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,786
Daytona, easily.

It's one of the most comfortable watches I own in steel.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 01:36 AM   #28
928ktgold
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LA
Watch: what’s next.
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
Very nice watches!. So you would say the 116500 and the 126500 wear just as comfortable?
Yes both 116 and 126 Daytonas are very comfortable. My most comfortable watch. As comfortable as my 16610LV
928ktgold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 01:45 AM   #29
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by 928ktgold View Post
Yes both 116 and 126 Daytonas are very comfortable. My most comfortable watch. As comfortable as my 16610LV
Appreciate the insight!. It looked comfortable but good to hear it from someone who has both!. Definitely going to be getting one!.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 June 2024, 12:27 PM   #30
Cambo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cam
Location: North of 49th
Watch: Rolex/Grand Seiko
Posts: 1,812
Have both…love both. But IMHO the jubilee is more comfortable but….barely
__________________
16618 126710BLRO 116500 LN (White) 228235 228239
SBGK002
Cambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.