The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old Yesterday, 08:27 AM   #1
Mrkevuk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Surrey U.K.
Posts: 15
Sea Dweller

Hi All. I know this is a difficult question to answer but is the sea Dweller easier to obtain from an AD then the Sub? I know if I go into my local AD and ask about the sub they don’t really want to know ,as they have so many enquiries so was wondering if the Sea Dweller is easy to get especially as it’s just under £3000 more.
Mrkevuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:41 AM   #2
WatchTimes
2025 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,869
Totally different watches, you have to try on to know which you like.
And is it easier to obtain? Depends on demand in your area.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:30 AM   #3
MrGoat
2025 Pledge Member
 
MrGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,722
I can tell you this. A 16600 is incredibly underrated at the moment and a very good buy in today’s market if you’re just looking for a watch for enjoyment instead of resale purposes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MrGoat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:37 AM   #4
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 472
[QUOTE=MrGoat;13538605]I can tell you this. A 16600 is incredibly underrated at the moment and a very good buy in today’s market if you’re just looking for a watch for enjoyment instead of resale purposes.

Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:43 AM   #5
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 472
Just my opinion, but I have owned every Sea Dweller reference at least once over the last 40 years...
And this is the one I kept ... My "K" series...

Name:  IMG_8959.JPG
Views: 0
Size:  188.0 KB
Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 06:03 AM   #6
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,158
[QUOTE=Ketler;13539093]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGoat View Post
I can tell you this. A 16600 is incredibly underrated at the moment and a very good buy in today’s market if you’re just looking for a watch for enjoyment instead of resale purposes.

If I didn't have my TT SD43 I could be tempted by the 16600, it is certainly good value at the moment.

All watches should be to wear not to invest in.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:47 PM   #7
Linuxpenguins
"TRF" Member
 
Linuxpenguins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Watch: SD4k - Sky D
Posts: 825
Buy a 116600 SD4k and thank me later! ;)
__________________
♛ Sea Dweller 4000 (SD4k) - Ref:116600
♛ Sky Dweller - Ref: 326934-0004

Ω Swatch X Omega Mission to Jupiter (SO33C100)
Linuxpenguins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:15 PM   #8
Kevin of Larchmont
2025 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linuxpenguins View Post
Buy a 116600 SD4k and thank me later! ;)
This is the way.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:54 PM   #9
ChronoZach
2025 Pledge Member
 
ChronoZach's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Zach
Location: Sector 001
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 883
Not sure in UK, in the states the SD is much easier to get than any submariner. Sometimes in stock for walk ins.

Cheers,
ChronoZach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:12 PM   #10
Wilco68
"TRF" Member
 
Wilco68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: SD43 / YM40 / DJ41
Posts: 328
Yes it is - I’m in the UK too. I got my SD43 in about four weeks from my AD. I’d bought my YM & DJ before though, so had some purchase history.

Prior I had the opportunity to try a new Sub & SD side by side at the AD, & for me the SD was just more impressive in every way. I just had to have one & my AD duly obliged in a short space of time.

It’s a regular wear for me, & despite its size, feels very comfortable on the wrist.
__________________
DJ41 126333 / SD43 126600 / YM40 126622
Wilco68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:24 PM   #11
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,158
The SD43 is an awesome watch but....

It is considerably bigger than a Submariner, if you like the size of the Submariner and think that it is the watch for you the SD43 may come as a bit of a shock, the fit is very different on your wrist, so must be tried beforehand.

I have a TT SD43 and a SS Submariner and prefer the fit of the Sea Dweller over that of the Submariner, to the point where I am in the process of selling the Submariner through Rolex's CPO program.

If you really want a Sub buy a Sub, the SD43 is not a Submariner substitute but a very different watch in its own right.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:18 PM   #12
brandrea
2025 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,458
Good luck, I hope you land one soon
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:36 PM   #13
OG1982
2025 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,157
The Sub is borderline too big, the SD is far too large for most wrists. I always laugh when I see the smallest, loudest idiot in my office, looks like his SD is wearing him. There’s something about small people wearing big watches, similar to the large cars they drive.

I guess the SD is made in fewer numbers than a Sub, but again I would guess that for every person who visits an AD and asks for a SD, there are 10, probably even more people asking for a Sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:23 AM   #14
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by OG1982 View Post
The Sub is borderline too big, the SD is far too large for most wrists.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is utter nonsense.

It all depends on an individuals capability to wear each watch, the shape and contours of the watch case, the shape of a owners wrist, the size of the wrist all contribute to the wearability of a watch, each of us is different and a watch will work well for some but not others.

I have a small wrist yet the SD43 sits really well on my wrist, it doesn't overpower the wrist simply because of the shape of my wrist. Yes it is a big watch but it fits me better than the Submariner I own.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:09 AM   #15
OG1982
2025 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxfordian View Post
This is utter nonsense.

It all depends on an individuals capability to wear each watch, the shape and contours of the watch case, the shape of a owners wrist, the size of the wrist all contribute to the wearability of a watch, each of us is different and a watch will work well for some but not others.

I have a small wrist yet the SD43 sits really well on my wrist, it doesn't overpower the wrist simply because of the shape of my wrist. Yes it is a big watch but it fits me better than the Submariner I own.

Utter nonsense? No, it’s just my experience with this watch in general.

It’s a good job we are all different and have our own preferences. You don’t have to be offended by my opinion of a watch, after all, it doesn’t affect your enjoyment of yours


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:50 AM   #16
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by OG1982 View Post
Utter nonsense? No, it’s just my experience with this watch in general.

It’s a good job we are all different and have our own preferences. You don’t have to be offended by my opinion of a watch, after all, it doesn’t affect your enjoyment of yours


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You state that the SD is 'too big for most wrists' then say its just your opinion with the watch, so your opinion equates to most people's wrists?

As stated an utter nonsense comment.

A comment that the watch was too big for you and could be too big for a lot of wrists would have been better.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:11 AM   #17
swish77
2025 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxfordian View Post
I have a small wrist yet the SD43 sits really well on my wrist, it doesn't overpower the wrist simply because of the shape of my wrist. Yes it is a big watch but it fits me better than the Submariner I own.
Agreed. The SD43 is very comfortable on my 6.75 inch wrist. Wears much more like a compact 42mm and the case/lug contours make it very wearable. The key is sizing it properly and removing the diver’s extension.

It’s absolutely my favorite modern dive watch, with vintage cues of the red writing and matte dial. Some guys write it off because of the dimensions on paper, but I’d urge anyone unsure to try it on first.

I’ve owned/worn virtually every Rolex Sea-Dweller .... DRSD 1665, Great White 1665, several 16600s, the 116600, and now the SD43. The only one I really didn’t like was the 116600. The 40mm case size combined with the weight and thickness made it too top-heavy and uncomfortable.

This is a good review of the SDS43, and if you don’t want to watch the whole thing, go to the 6:45 minute mark to see how the watch wears on the reviewer’s 6.5-inch wrist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCCs9eY03c8
Attached Images
 
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:35 AM   #18
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Agreed. The SD43 is very comfortable on my 6.75 inch wrist. Wears much more like a compact 42mm and the case/lug contours make it very wearable. The key is sizing it properly and removing the diver’s extension.

It’s absolutely my favorite modern dive watch, with vintage cues of the red writing and matte dial. Some guys write it off because of the dimensions on paper, but I’d urge anyone unsure to try it on first.

I’ve owned/worn virtually every Rolex Sea-Dweller .... DRSD 1665, Great White 1665, several 16600s, the 116600, and now the SD43. The only one I really didn’t like was the 116600. The 40mm case size combined with the weight and thickness made it too top-heavy and uncomfortable.

This is a good review of the SDS43, and if you don’t want to watch the whole thing, go to the 6:45 minute mark to see how the watch wears on the reviewer’s 6.5-inch wrist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCCs9eY03c8
With 6.75” you’re gonna have a tough time with many dive watches.
However, the SD43 is simply TOO BIG, and the only one I really don’t like.
Sweet spot for sea-dwellers is 40MM whether 16600 or SD4K.

But, to each their own. Thankfully many options exist.

Now back to the original comment from the op; the sea dweller is more readily available from the AD, notwithstanding the fact that subs are produced in numbers greater than 3 to 1.

Everyone eyes the sub as their first (and last) Rolex.
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:39 AM   #19
Gearjockey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by OG1982 View Post
The Sub is borderline too big, the SD is far too large for most wrists. I always laugh when I see the smallest, loudest idiot in my office, looks like his SD is wearing him. There’s something about small people wearing big watches, similar to the large cars they drive.

I guess the SD is made in fewer numbers than a Sub, but again I would guess that for every person who visits an AD and asks for a SD, there are 10, probably even more people asking for a Sub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



hmm, I don’t think so. In fact, I think the sub 40 is the perfect size.
I never tried on the 41 because I don’t trust the 3235 so maybe the sub 41 is borderline too big, I don’t know. I notice many complaining about the large clasp?

As perfect as the sub 40 was, I still ended up selling it on for an SD4K because I enjoyed the smaller footprint with less ubiquity.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Gearjockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:10 AM   #20
OG1982
2025 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearjockey View Post


hmm, I don’t think so. In fact, I think the sub 40 is the perfect size.
I never tried on the 41 because I don’t trust the 3235 so maybe the sub 41 is borderline too big, I don’t know. I notice many complaining about the large clasp?

As perfect as the sub 40 was, I still ended up selling it on for an SD4K because I enjoyed the smaller footprint with less ubiquity.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Remember, borderline too big is subjective.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:26 PM   #21
Number3
"TRF" Member
 
Number3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 4,037
The Sea Dweller can be had unworn for under retail in the UK so yes, it is easier to get than a Sub. As others have said it’s a very different watch though.
Number3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:39 PM   #22
ap1
2025 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,650
Aluminum bezel version for the win on the SD for me
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:44 PM   #23
travisb
"TRF" Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,784
Yes. The SD has always been a more niche watch.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:59 AM   #24
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrkevuk View Post
Hi All. I know this is a difficult question to answer but is the sea Dweller easier to obtain from an AD then the Sub? I know if I go into my local AD and ask about the sub they don’t really want to know ,as they have so many enquiries so was wondering if the Sea Dweller is easy to get especially as it’s just under £3000 more.
SeaDweller is one of the few sports watches which is selling under retail or on retail in gray market. I wouldn't even bother with AD at this point.
Maxy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:40 AM   #25
WatchTimes
2025 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,869
This is the SD I wear and love! 116600
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
Rolex.Swiss.Watches
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.