![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,088 | 69.26% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 4.01% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
420 | 26.73% |
Voters: 1571. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
Quote:
I personally doubt that. As mentioned in other posts Rolex are known to silently fix things. Things we folk didn’t even know was an issue. They 100% know about this and if there was a simple fix it would already be implemented. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 42 (3 members and 39 guests) | |
saxo3 , Easy E , Goatrope |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.