![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,096 | 69.37% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 3.99% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
421 | 26.65% |
Voters: 1580. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
|
The watchmaker saying the date change has an issue actually is ringing true.
So my dd40 on a timegrapher dial up always shows about 0spd. But when left dial up over night always comes up -2. I did wonder if the double date change was taxing on the movement during the chang period. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
Quote:
To be clear, it loses less time when resting than when on the wrist. But it used to gain. Aside from a problem, all I can think of is that PR was typically more depleted than I thought, but doubt it would be that way consistently. Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 33 (0 members and 33 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.