The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 November 2019, 04:25 PM   #31
ajw45
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Scratches have nothing to do with durability,

Titanium is used in jet engines because of it's light weight and heat resistance; you can't get more durable than that.

It is used in watches as a marketing gimmick. There is no practical reason to use titanium in the environment a watch encounters.
Could not disagree more. Lighter, harder, much more corrosion resistant, low conductivity, if anything there really is no reason (grade 5) titanium isn't better than stainless steel in every way in the environment a watch encounters.... other than cost. The only reason to use stainless is because it is cheaper (base material and machining/finishing) and has a slightly different appearance (brighter).
ajw45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 February 2020, 08:47 PM   #32
56Diver
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 118
Curious what grade titanium the Panerai submersibles use? Grade 5?
56Diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2020, 06:42 AM   #33
Dave455
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sussex, U.K.
Posts: 146
I can give a bit of input here.

I’ve owned, and worked with, titanium a bit over the years, and learned a lot.

I know from personal experience that titanium is generally softer than steel, and you would expect it to scratch easily, but it does vary with the grade concerned.

With regard to watches, I was always wary, but I fly for a living, many colleagues own a titanium Breitling Aerospace, and some are a reasonable age. Despite a relatively hard life, none of these watches, even those with the titanium bracelet, seem to show many marks.

Encouraged by this I bought a Tudor Pelagos. I absolutely love it. It’s legibility is unsurpassed, it’s lume is unbelievable, and it’s only downside (it’s bulk) is offset by the titanium. I was seriously annoyed when I scuffed the bracelet. It scratched easily and looked awful. I left it for a while, then went to polish out the scratches with an ink eraser (old trick). I was surprised to find they were almost invisible!

What seems to happen is that titanium does scratch, which initially looks bad as the scratch shows pale against the materials surface oxidisation. After a while though, the scratches oxidise as well and can barely be seen.

With regard to steel, Matt or beadblasted cases seem to be the most scratch resistant. I have a CWC chronograph that is probably 25 plus years old and has been worn regularly. It shows few marks. The Sinn ‘Tegimented’ steel cases seem to be pretty much untouchable though, as has been suggested!
Dave455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.