ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 February 2020, 03:58 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3
|
Question about Explorer II 1655 dial
IMG_5934.jpg
I think that my Explorer II has a MK-2 dial, however its serial number is as high as 5,67...M (1978-1979). Does it sound right? Any insights will be very welcome! Guillem |
26 February 2020, 02:07 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,260
|
It does look like a Mk2. Welcome.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
26 February 2020, 02:19 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,985
|
Yes, MK2, which are generally accepted up to 5.5 million, but like most lists, there's probably some overlap/flexibility. If it were me, I'd want to find other MK2 examples later than 5.5 million to feel more confident that the dial is original to the watch.
But ... What do you mean that the watch's "serial number is as high as 5,67...M?" Do you mean that the serial number between the lugs IS indeed 5.67 million? |
26 February 2020, 05:52 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
|
|
26 February 2020, 08:09 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,985
|
Ah, OK, so yes, 5.6 million is outside the usual accepted serial number range for MK2 dials on 1655s, but it's fairly close. As I mentioned, if it were me, I'd be on the hunt to try to find other examples of 5.6 million MK2s. That would make me feel better.
|
26 February 2020, 12:44 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
Thanks for the advice! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.