ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2020, 02:16 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,350
|
Sub lume dial
Does this look authentic for 16610? Thanks!
|
17 April 2020, 08:58 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cologne
Posts: 47
|
Yes, the dial on the pictures is genuine. Correct stamp on the back side is the first thing you want to see. HQ rep dials don’t have that stamp.
Also rounded corners on the indices look good. Rep dials usually have sharper edged indices |
18 April 2020, 05:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
agreed
genuine
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done." |
18 April 2020, 05:37 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 379
|
No red flags.
|
18 April 2020, 05:40 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,350
|
Thanks! Really appreciate it.
|
18 April 2020, 05:46 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
Looks fine (genuine), but does appear to have damage from hand-drag.
|
18 April 2020, 05:59 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,350
|
|
19 April 2020, 02:46 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: TT DJ 16233
Posts: 1,002
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.