ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

roadcarver · 30 August 2006, 11:53 AM

What are the major differences between 14060, 14060A and 14060M? My sub 14060 being serviced by RSC indicates it is a 14060 with no suffix following the model. It also has a E s/n which is a 1991 production.

Insights? Thanks.

Gedanken · 30 August 2006, 12:05 PM

If I recall correctly, the 14060 used a caliber 3000 movement, and was designated the 14060M when the movement was changed to the 3130. Don't know anything about a 14060A, though.

For a comparison between the 3000 and 3130, look here.

roadcarver · 30 August 2006, 01:22 PM

Thanks Gedanken for the feedback!

Gedanken · 30 August 2006, 01:59 PM

No sweat, RC - I asked the same question about two years ago.

JJ Irani · 30 August 2006, 05:49 PM

James is right about the movements. The 14060 had 27 jewels while the later 14060M is fitted with 31 jewels. Never heard of a 14060A!!

Cheers - JJ

roadcarver · 31 August 2006, 05:01 AM

I guess I heard the 14060A through one forum, i think Timezone. Thanks.

30 August 2006, 11:53 AM	#1
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	14060 variations What are the major differences between 14060, 14060A and 14060M? My sub 14060 being serviced by RSC indicates it is a 14060 with no suffix following the model. It also has a E s/n which is a 1991 production. Insights? Thanks.

30 August 2006, 12:05 PM	#2
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	If I recall correctly, the 14060 used a caliber 3000 movement, and was designated the 14060M when the movement was changed to the 3130. Don't know anything about a 14060A, though. For a comparison between the 3000 and 3130, look here. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

30 August 2006, 01:22 PM	#3
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	Thanks Thanks Gedanken for the feedback!

30 August 2006, 01:59 PM	#4
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	No sweat, RC - I asked the same question about two years ago. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

30 August 2006, 05:49 PM	#5
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	James is right about the movements. The 14060 had 27 jewels while the later 14060M is fitted with 31 jewels. Never heard of a 14060A!! Cheers - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

31 August 2006, 05:01 AM	#6
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	14060a I guess I heard the 14060A through one forum, i think Timezone. Thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)