ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

garyk · 16 November 2020, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snyde

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Very amazing, had to look twice to see it wasn’t the DD...

billybob1999 · 16 November 2020, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyk

Very amazing, had to look twice to see it wasn’t the DD...

I think it also looks great with the blue dial.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

Benzsiam · 16 November 2020, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtnator

This is the one I like

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is the most beautiful timepiece for Tudor, it must be very popular.

gtnator · 7 December 2020, 02:42 PM

Finally got mine today. It’s gorgeous in person. The dial looks larger, and wears smaller than I thought from pics.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ajw99 · 7 December 2020, 07:30 PM

Looks very nice! How would you describe the lume on the hands? Any lume shots?

gtnator · 9 December 2020, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajw99

Looks very nice! How would you describe the lume on the hands? Any lume shots?

Lume is decent but only on the hands.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SPMN · 10 December 2020, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickyvu

Here is mine
Got it 2 weeks ago

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk

This is one of the better photos I've seen on TRF. Beautiful watch!

gtnator · 10 December 2020, 01:42 PM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ajw99 · 14 December 2020, 01:16 AM

Can anyone definitively confirm whether the new Tudor Royal bracelet has pins/collars or screws for the links? Thank you.

gtnator · 14 December 2020, 01:51 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

gtnator · 30 December 2020, 02:20 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ajw99 · 10 January 2021, 01:20 AM

Looks so good!

placek · 10 January 2021, 04:33 AM

I guess there has to be one that disagrees. I think this watch looks like garbage. The band is a straight rip off of AP. The face is a cheap day date, and what the hell is with that bezel.

Dan Pierce · 10 January 2021, 04:41 AM

And there you have it, a critique as subtle as a fart in an elevator.
dP

placek · 10 January 2021, 04:44 AM

Subtle as a sledge hammer is more my liking. No need to sugar coat it. That watch blows

fooey · 10 January 2021, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by placek

I guess there has to be one that disagrees. I think this watch looks like garbage. The band is a straight rip off of AP. The face is a cheap day date, and what the hell is with that bezel.

Why bother with this thread then?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

KonradvonMarburg · 10 January 2021, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spoonage

This would be on my list were it not for the engine turned bezel. Much prefer the fluted bezel. Wonder if the bezel from the Tudor Style would fit. I know it would be a Frankenwatch at that point but that would be a very nice watch indeed.

scuse, me. Could u post pictures of the differences between engine turned and fluted bezel.

thanks u sir

winst · 10 January 2021, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by placek

I guess there has to be one that disagrees. I think this watch looks like garbage. The band is a straight rip off of AP. The face is a cheap day date, and what the hell is with that bezel.

I’d have a look at some historical pictures of the Rolex Oyster Quartz if I were you and if you have the balls to admit you were wrong report back your findings to us. At that point you have a choice of either complimentary custard, ice cream or pouring cream to accompany your humble pie.

winst · 10 January 2021, 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winst

I’d have a look at some historical pictures of the Rolex Oyster Quartz if I were you and if you have the balls to admit you were wrong report back your findings to us. At that point you have a choice of either complimentary custard, ice cream or pouring cream to accompany your humble pie.

This is a 1996 model, though I,believe they were produced from the early 1970’s till early 2000’s. Looks more like Tudor are drawing upon their Rolex connection than having to ‘rip off’ AP.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

KonradvonMarburg · 10 January 2021, 05:10 AM

I generally like the design and I just read that this is considered an entry-level Tudor. Always considered Tudor to be a watch people buy if they can't afford a Rolex. That being said I like the overall design of this one- EXCEPT for the rounded ends on the hour and minute hands. I prefer square cut or points. The rounded ends of the hands makes the watch look a bit child-like IMHO.

That being said, if you like it, get one and wear it in good health. :)

TswaneNguni · 10 January 2021, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickyvu

Here is mine
Got it 2 weeks ago

Hmmm,very interesting !!

KonradvonMarburg · 10 January 2021, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by placek

I guess there has to be one that disagrees. I think this watch looks like garbage. The band is a straight rip off of AP. The face is a cheap day date, and what the hell is with that bezel.

Tell us how you really feel.

KonradvonMarburg · 10 January 2021, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billybob1999

I think it also looks great with the blue dial.

Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

This is the ONLY one I have seen with square cut ends on the minute and hour hands. The rest are all curved. Is this an older model?

placek · 10 January 2021, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fooey

Why bother with this thread then?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Casue sometimes you need to throw a bucket of cold water on a room full of guys verbally masturbating over a piece of garbage.

forgedblades · 10 January 2021, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TswaneNguni

Hmmm,very interesting !!

agree

winst · 10 January 2021, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by placek

Casue sometimes you need to throw a bucket of cold water on a room full of guys verbally masturbating over a piece of garbage.

Most illuminating, have you managed to read up on the Oyster Quartz out of interest yet to pass comment upon your naive statement that Tudor ripped off an AP design?

placek · 10 January 2021, 05:53 AM

You are correct on the Oyster Quartz, one of Rolex's best sellers? and arguably the biggest piece of crap they have ever put out. You guys want to piss 2K on this garbage, more power to you. It's an AWFUL watch, period. You might as well strap an Invicta on your wrist cause anyone outside of this forum will think you are wearing one.

10 January 2021, 04:41 AM	#44
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,166	And there you have it, a critique as subtle as a fart in an elevator. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

7 December 2020, 02:42 PM	#34
gtnator 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi, Posts: 2,084	Finally got mine today. It’s gorgeous in person. The dial looks larger, and wears smaller than I thought from pics. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

7 December 2020, 07:30 PM	#35
ajw99 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: US Posts: 280	Looks very nice! How would you describe the lume on the hands? Any lume shots?

10 December 2020, 01:42 PM	#38
gtnator 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi, Posts: 2,084	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

14 December 2020, 01:16 AM	#39
ajw99 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: US Posts: 280	Can anyone definitively confirm whether the new Tudor Royal bracelet has pins/collars or screws for the links? Thank you.

14 December 2020, 01:51 AM	#40
gtnator 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi, Posts: 2,084	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 December 2020, 02:20 AM	#41
gtnator 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: USA Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi, Posts: 2,084	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 January 2021, 01:20 AM	#42
ajw99 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: US Posts: 280	Looks so good!

10 January 2021, 04:33 AM	#43
placek Banned Join Date: Apr 2020 Real Name: Paul Location: Las Vegas Watch: Red Sea Dweller 43 Posts: 102	I guess there has to be one that disagrees. I think this watch looks like garbage. The band is a straight rip off of AP. The face is a cheap day date, and what the hell is with that bezel.

10 January 2021, 04:44 AM	#45
placek Banned Join Date: Apr 2020 Real Name: Paul Location: Las Vegas Watch: Red Sea Dweller 43 Posts: 102	Subtle as a sledge hammer is more my liking. No need to sugar coat it. That watch blows

10 January 2021, 05:10 AM	#50
KonradvonMarburg Banned Join Date: Jul 2020 Location: Ontario Posts: 189	I generally like the design and I just read that this is considered an entry-level Tudor. Always considered Tudor to be a watch people buy if they can't afford a Rolex. That being said I like the overall design of this one- EXCEPT for the rounded ends on the hour and minute hands. I prefer square cut or points. The rounded ends of the hands makes the watch look a bit child-like IMHO. That being said, if you like it, get one and wear it in good health. :)

10 January 2021, 05:53 AM	#57
placek Banned Join Date: Apr 2020 Real Name: Paul Location: Las Vegas Watch: Red Sea Dweller 43 Posts: 102	You are correct on the Oyster Quartz, one of Rolex's best sellers? and arguably the biggest piece of crap they have ever put out. You guys want to piss 2K on this garbage, more power to you. It's an AWFUL watch, period. You might as well strap an Invicta on your wrist cause anyone outside of this forum will think you are wearing one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)