![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,096 | 69.37% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 3.99% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
421 | 26.65% |
Voters: 1580. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,328
|
Quote:
![]() It's going to be the only/best chance of gathering something that resembles conclusive data that exists outside of the mothership ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 3,220
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,328
|
As I've intimated previously.
We have no 32xx movements in our household by choice. We are not necessarily early adopters by nature. Besides, our current Rolex watches are running perfectly. But I've definately come close on two separate occassions with a particular DJ41. As I've made clear, this thread is great ![]() To answer your question. No I have no data to offer on this specific topic. Except to say that it doesn't take into consideration all scenarios which may have a bearing. But you are aware of that aspect Sorry, my late Dad was recognised as one of "the legends" of the bureau of statistics. So I have more than the usual understanding of the construction of polls and sensis gathering questions after much robust discussion with him over it every few years ![]() Carry on and best wishes ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 43 (1 members and 42 guests) | |
jkumar2324 |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.