![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 16
|
If you were allocated a 5711/1A from an AD
should you be allowed to go on the waitlist for the successor model, assuming there will be one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 88
|
In my experience, if you get a nautilus in 2021. You likely will not get a subsequent nautilus for 2021 or maybe 2022
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 4,349
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Bob
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 12,771
|
What a dilemma to have. In view, why wait years for the new model when you can have this one now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,705
|
I don't quite understand your specific situation. But regardless, you just have to ask your AD. Only they will know what they will do or not do for you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 441
|
Sure, why not. I think there is a lot of fungibility with wait lists and ADs want to keep their best customers happy. That said, I do think that with such limited quantities of references like the 5711 (and potential successors) the good ADs work to spread them around a bit. I received a 5711 in 2019 and, if I ask for the new version, wouldn’t expect one for a year or two.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,505
|
It does vary and also depends on your relationship. I don't think there is a rule per se. I have been allocated more than one nautilus in a year.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,752
|
In my experience that’s what happens if there is an immediate replacement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saudi Arabia
Watch: Patek 3700/11AJ
Posts: 717
|
I had to wait for my nautilus between 4-5 years. I had to wait for my AP Royal Oak around 2 years, and i purchased both after a manufacturer price increase.
In my opinioin when you get allocated one of the hot pieces by our AD....just take it
__________________
Current Collection: PP 3700/11AJ, PP 5170G, PP 5320G, PP 5712/1A, APRO 15500, Rolex 116234, Rolex GMT Master2 BLNR, Omega SMP, Baume & Mercier M0A10280 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
If you were allocated a 5711 naturally speaking you would be automatically be placed on the replacement model (assuming the allocation means you were guaranteed a 5711 sometime soon). Most honest ADs would do this. Patek is likely updating the Nautilus not completely discontinuing the line so you should be "next in line" for whatever replaces it.
If they actually have the 5711 in hand for you but want to transfer it the newer model... it might be fair game for the AD to deny your request (since they are actually fulfilling their obligation). You are given an opportunity to get the 5711... I wouldn't pass on it. Not everything new is better. The 5711 is near perfection already. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 593
|
Personally, if I had a chance to buy current 5711, I definitely would for two reasons:
1. I love the watch in it's current variation and would love to wear it. 2. I don't know what the replacement will be; Patek might never product another steel 5711 (or whatever the new reference might be). Just look at the steel 5980. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.