Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy
He’s disappointed Rob, he has an agenda, ignores contradicting information and embellishes ones that support his theory.
|
Saxo is surely capable of defending himself but I do find this characterization a bit off, especially given your normally reasonable tone. To be blunt there literally is no contradicting information. The only actual watchmakers who have posted in this thread all suggest there is a problem. To believe otherwise would require, what, thinking Bas photoshopped the images? The only debate is over how widespread the problem is. Some believe you have as much likelihood of splitting an atom when you go to cut into your steak at dinner. But many of us have already seen too many of these "exceedingly rare" reports to believe it isn't systemic to some extent. Does it impact every single 32xx? Of course not. Has any quality mechanical item ever had a 100% failure rate? That would be as shocking as a 0% failure rate. But in addition to the obviously defective pieces, my personal 180 amplitude (but still keeping spec time) Sub suggests there could be a whole group of movements that may be on borrowed time even though things look great at the moment. We shall see. And that is precisely the point of the thread. I am quickly losing interest in explaining the concept of an ellipsoid to flat earthers. (That is not directed at you VTC!)
Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk